LMR wrote:
on letsrun at work wrote:I think that one INTERESTING thing about contacting these 100 runners would be what, if anything, they had already heard about this cheating scandal. It might even be worth betting the over/under on.
Having followed this thread for awhile, I wonder what percentage of runners from last year's race are already aware of this, and to what degree.
Of course, I also feel that Ken should NOT contact these people, but assuming he is in the middle of doing so now....
Ken, when you bring up the subject...how many say:
Oh, that guy? Yeah I read /heard about that! Crazy......
and how many are informed of it by the first time by you?
A related question...Has any one of the 100 or so runners in question or ANY runner in the video with, what, 200 photographed runners, posted in this thread?
I don't expect ANY of the runners to remember anything. That is kind of the whole point - that runners aren't out on the course policing other runners. So Barb's statement that "nobody saw nothing" is ludicrous to begin with. What I do expect to hear is that none of the runners were contacted, which is what Barb's statement implies to the general public. Hearing from a dozen or so runners that they were not contacted would be proof that no investigation was done.
And these statements will be forwarded to her, on a flash drive, along with a copy of the YouTube video showing the 5 photo checkpoints, as well as expert runner testimony that Mike's time was completely inconceivable. Once she has this proof, she will be contacted to comment on it. Once she has has the opportunity to comment then the story will be written.
This is how a legit story gets written. Not by reading an online article written by somebody else and quizzing somebody on it, not even knowing if they know what you are talking about.
Ken how would you know anything about a legit story?
You pretending to know stuff like when you lied about knowing how IP addresses work?
You lie so much.