Did Mike Rossi (viral marathon dad) cheat his way into Boston?

abingtonrunner wrote:

poster of statistics wrote:

for example this new post of yours sets out nothing new and uses bad language to poor effect, it will not count towards the count

feel free to post however you do, but the thread is dying and needs something new and refreshing

It is coming. I am on it. Working on a few things, but since some of us do work, the bulk of it will be done this weekend. But stayed tuned.

If only you knew how sad and pathetic you sound.

I can't wait to see your pile of newspaper clippings and red yarn to conclusively prove that Mike Rossi killed the Archduke Ferdinand.

A Not So Beautiful Mind wrote:

abingtonrunner wrote:

It is coming. I am on it. Working on a few things, but since some of us do work, the bulk of it will be done this weekend. But stayed tuned.

If only you knew how sad and pathetic you sound.

I can't wait to see your pile of newspaper clippings and red yarn to conclusively prove that Mike Rossi killed the Archduke Ferdinand.

Hi mike

I am a self-appointed poster of statistics free of any Brojo stamp of approval, therefore I get to set my own standards of what I count.

I am not banning you, or even chiding you, for your posts, just not counting them until they have some inherent value of newness.

I cannot make you run a mile before you post again, but part of your investigation might be aided if you attempted to understand running through first-hand experience.

As an example of what would definitely count as a good post: if you were to attempt to get into the mind of the perpetrator like they did in Silence of the Lambs by going out and running(or even walking) the marathon course you might come across the key piece of evidence or see the event in a new perspective that helps you break the case wide open. Like stumbling across a sign for a book club that meets at Starbucks every week near the finish of the course and then you go on Facebook and see photos from that day timestamped during the race in which someone is in the background. Not saying it will happen the first mile but maybe the second or the 23rd. Anyway, that would be the basis of a good post: a field report examining forensic analysis.

Feel free to post away, I just reserve the right to count or not count in statistics. And trust me, no one wants to have to do the menial tedious work of counting in order to post these statistics.

Please consider running or walking a mile and then posting. I am sure it would count.

I will not keep replying to you, regrettably, because I feel it is unfair for me to pad the statistics by posting a lot just about statistics. In fact I probably will not count my posts anymore either in order to keep the integrity high.

by way of last example: there is footage out there from the start and middle points, why doesn't anyone go get the footage and review it? The raw footage of this event, not just the edited footage shown here,

AND NEVER PREVIOUSLY NOTED ON THIS THREAD - BREAKING NEWS:

http://touch.mcall.com/#section/-1/video/p2p-81293938/

you must find this Harry Fisher and access his memory cards, can't you trade a good wedding video or two for a copy of that raw footage and then there is something to work with?

the truth is out there

photographer and videographer Harry Fisher is the key to this whole thing:

more pictures in this too have to click on right hand side for more content and see one at a time

http://touch.mcall.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-81293916/

LoserMikeRossi and abingtonrunner are NOT the same poster unless LMR is using abington's moniker, which I doubt.The thread is slowing down, which is natural, but it aint over. Rossi will get disqualified from LVM.

Pa. Runner wrote:

So we now know that Ken is using multiple aliases on this thread.

Ken - please stop with the personal attacks and stick the facts and evidence that we do know.

Ooops! wrote:

Whoops. Look like you forgot to log out of your abingtonrunner account before responding, LoserMikeRossi.

Busted!

Bravo LoserMikeRossi. Bravo. You're running the most epic troll ever! The odds of you being Ken Stillman are about the same as the odds that MR ran a legit 3:11. Keep up the good work!

Tired of Ken's Sad Act wrote:

LoserMikeRossi wrote:

I have a pretty busy weekend with DJing 3 events, so I will be gone for a few day, but just know it wasn't because of Rossi and his idiots here. I'd like to try and do something good here.

.

Why are you still here, then?

Try Harder wrote:

Summary needed wrote:

Longtime reader, first time poster (to this thread)

Without reading all 7442 posts...

A few questions:

1. So is the answer yes?

2. Has he previously cheated before or was this his first attempt?

3. Has he admitted cheating or made a public comment? What is his reason for such a fast marathon compared to his other times?

4. Any chance of an article like the Kip thing?

5. Kip has to be loving this right now.

The thread is slipping, you have to do better than this to bring it back to life.

I'm sure the thread is dying but I have seriously not clicked it til now. Not looking to revive anything. Just wanted a recap before it dies.

Answers below.

It would be interesting to here his perspective, and/or maybe he can land the final blow and redeem himself by bringing down a cheat. Kind of like Clarise having to go to Hannibal Lector to solve the Buffalo Bill murders :)

Summary Needed wrote:

Try Harder wrote:

The thread is slipping, you have to do better than this to bring it back to life.

I'm sure the thread is dying but I have seriously not clicked it til now. Not looking to revive anything. Just wanted a recap before it dies.

Instead of reading a book this weekend start on page 1 of this thread and keep going until you can't go any more. I feel like it would be disingenuous to allow you to Rossi your way out of this thread by getting a summary.

Hi Ken

Let me give everyone the update that Mike Rossi doesn't want you to hear.

1.) Mike and his minions are posting under multiple anonymous names encouraging everyone to stick with the facts. The same info that has been passed around since page 5, in order to get everyone bored with this thread.

2.) Then they post how there is nothing new and this is boring and we should all just drop it and leave him alone.

But work is being done behind the scenes and we certainly aren't going to tip our hands to Mike.

But let's face it. Mike is a joke and I haven't laughed this hard since The Last Man On Earth ended on Fox. I think we should all just have some fun until this is resolved. And occasionally somebody will offer a serious suggestion.

Also if anybody is interested in actually finding the evidence we can make arrangements to show you our progress and look at the info with fresh eyes.

My name is Kenneth Stillman and you can find my profile on the Via Marathon Facebook page. Send me a friend request and as long as it's not clearly a bogus profile I will get back to you.

WWRD wrote:

Answers below.

[quote]Summary needed wrote:

Longtime reader, first time poster (to this thread)

Without reading all 7442 posts...

A few questions:

1. So is the answer yes? Yes with little if any doubt.

Could anyone who has still has a little doubt please outline the reasons for that doubt? I do understand a non-runner having doubt, stemming from simple ignorance. No rationale person would have any doubt whatsoever as there is no plausible scenario to explain away the evidence.

But I try to keep an open mind to all possibilities, so tell me please under what scenario Mike Rossi legitimately ran 3:11.

I think they said this wrote:

I think they said they needed conclusive evidence that he did not run the course. E.g. - photo or video of him actually leaving the course and traveling outside the course. Not just a lack of affirmative evidence.

yeah but, that is just nonsense. So nobody can be convicted of a murder unless they get videotaped doing it? People aren't this stupid, they have to know that is tantamount to saying "we will never DQ anybody no matter what". It is just such an idiotic reason. The evidence is overwhelmingly conclusive that he cheated. It's irrefutable. And it was most definitely affirmative.

The good news is, a piece of sh*t like that is always going to be a piece of sh*t, it all comes around. Karma's a b*tch.

Ok I've got something ladies and gents! Can someone please post the link to the start line selfie, I just need to confirm one minor detail before I hand this off to the brojos.

it has been there all along wrote:

photographer and videographer Harry Fisher is the key to this whole thing:

more pictures in this too have to click on right hand side for more content and see one at a time

http://touch.mcall.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-81293916/

Yeah but that is murder.

We are talking about RUNNING!

Well more like jogging here.

Gotta be a tear in the time/space continuum. There was a black hole allegedly photographed at the start and appeared again at the finish.We have identified this as BH 2161.

But I try to keep an open mind to all possibilities, so tell me please under what scenario Mike Rossi legitimately ran 3:11.

Oh snap! I think I see him as well and he sure isn't running! I have to look at it on a high def screen later. The best positive id would be with the finish photos that show his shorts and shoes. The selfie only shows his shirt. You can find the link earlier in the thread. Does this site have a search function for the love of God?

Rossi, if you want to put out a release about how you cheated because you had to run Boston because you love America and hate terrorists so you can get ahead of this, the time is now.

What do you see?

it has been there all along wrote:

photographer and videographer Harry Fisher is the key to this whole thing:

more pictures in this too have to click on right hand side for more content and see one at a time

http://touch.mcall.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-81293916/