What land? It's a sand pit, the closest thing to Hell you will ever experience.
What land? It's a sand pit, the closest thing to Hell you will ever experience.
Truth! Some Libt**d attempted to claim that toddlers with guns kill more Americans than terrorists. WTF! I guess 9/11 doesn't count. They are so out of touch you can't even reason.
I think that is small minded wrote:
Jimmy the Macedonian wrote:Within any population, there is going to be violence.
So why are Americans tolerant of white nationalist violence, but completely intolerant of violence when it involves muslims?
Come on now, we tolerate all kinds of racial violence--ever heard of the little city called Chicago? 8 dead and 62 wounded over the Thanksgiving Day weekend. No white nationalist involved. And no one seems to care.
I guess black on black and black on white violence doesn't count unless it's white on black, then Shakedown Jesse and race baiter Rev Al get involved.
Reel K5 wrote:
Sbeefyk1 wrote:This dude was probably in America for at least 10-15 years. Us being in the Middle East pisses off muslims because we've literally destroyed their lands.
Yep. It is somehow "radical' to strike back when the USA and Israel bomb and invade your land and kill your people.
Totally. We all know about Israel's sordid history of Somalian intervention, which is obviously why Artan attacked students at a university in Ohio. This is why ISIS takes Yazidi sex slaves, too. It's revenge for foreign intervention in Muslim countries. Certainly not because Mohammed himself told his armies they could take sex slaves or anything like that.
Probably why Sunnis are blowing up Shia mosques all over the Middle East, too. Revenge for Western intervention, right?
I didn't say that but you are comparing domestic terrorists to a war that has been fought since the beginning of time. It will not end and we need to stay out of it.
Idontreallyknow wrote:
doot doot wrote:There is a lot of "data" missing surrounding Orlando.
Pretty crazy that an article left out a shooting that happened a year after it was published
Not crazy at all when you think about it. Doesn't fit the radical left's narrative. So they just ignore it. Remember how NBC doctored George Zimmerman's 911 call to make it appear that he was a racist? The media does it all the time. Look at the knockout game. It happened 1000s of times and the media never covered it. The ONE time that a white did the same, every network was covering it. The Justice Dept. never once prosecuted a single instance of the knockout game when perpetrated by a black person. The ONE time that a white guy did it, they prosecuted.
Good thing it wasn't in CO where illegal immigrants can work in law enforcement. What a freakin joke. This is why that will result in casualties.
Polly Plumper wrote:
Idontreallyknow wrote:Pretty crazy that an article left out a shooting that happened a year after it was published
Not crazy at all when you think about it. Doesn't fit the radical left's narrative. So they just ignore it. Remember how NBC doctored George Zimmerman's 911 call to make it appear that he was a racist? The media does it all the time. Look at the knockout game. It happened 1000s of times and the media never covered it. The ONE time that a white did the same, every network was covering it. The Justice Dept. never once prosecuted a single instance of the knockout game when perpetrated by a black person. The ONE time that a white guy did it, they prosecuted.
He's being sarcastic. The shooting in Orlando happened one year AFTER the article was published. Idiot.
Luckily, nobody innocent was killed in this attack, only the attacker.
Also there is no evidence so far that this guy was doing this in the name of Islam yet.
Also, see how things can end so differently if the crazy has a knife and not an assault rifle?
What...? wrote:
Also there is no evidence so far that this guy was doing this in the name of Islam yet.
Yes there is.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ohio-state-attack-suspect-posted-rant-before-his-attack/ar-AAkRG0E?li=BBnbcA1This is a precursor to the next 4 years. Trump presidency was the only way he could make Trump enterprises profitable again.
Miss Wumi Abdul wrote:
Trump has already walked back the muslim ban, because it pissed of Turkey, where he's building a new hotel.
Chewbaccca wrote:
No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims. We are not able to sufficiently vet these refugees so doesn't it make sense to stop allowing into the country until they can be sufficiently vetted?
"Why are we letting them in?"
Answer = TARGET PRACTICE.
funny people wrote:
Throughout history, when average people are struggling, elites (republicans as of recent history) have always pointed the finger at the funny people, whether is was the irish, italian, blacks, muslims etc.
Then, when the uninformed are getting their panties in a bunch, the elites enrich themselves even more.
I see where you are coming from, but I don't quite agree. I don't think Muslims are a manufactured boogeyman by the American bourgeoisie. If anything, America is a manufacture boogeyman for the Muslim bourgeoisie. As long as the poor Muslims see America as the enemy, the rich Muslims can stay in power and stay rich.
In America, the Social Justice Warriors are the ones increasing identity divides, preventing the proletariat from rising up.
For so long more and more people saw black and hispanics as disadvantaged and wanted to make them equally advantaged. When too many people wanted minorities to not have disadvantages, they made up the term "white privilege." "White privilege" scares poor white people that they have to lose something to minorities, instead of focusing on the people with the money.
So Trump wins, stocks rise, rich get richer.
What...? wrote:
Luckily, nobody innocent was killed in this attack, only the attacker.
Also there is no evidence so far that this guy was doing this in the name of Islam yet.
Also, see how things can end so differently if the crazy has a knife and not an assault rifle?
Yeah, you're right! That boxcutter attack on 9/11/01 worked out pretty good as well.
Sheesh,its not like he was threatening Snowflakes with a Post-It Note!
Chewbaccca wrote:
No one is is slaughtering people in the name of a religion. Only Muslims. We are not able to sufficiently vet these refugees so doesn't it make sense to stop allowing into the country until they can be sufficiently vetted?
Um? Because most of us know the difference between a statement and its converse?
Just another white cop shooting an unarmed black man.
I reject your contention that white men should not be allowed near churches and schools
"Nobody is facing death threats from The Amish" - Salman Rushdie
There is clearly something going on in Islam. However, the main target of IS and Al-Qaeda is....Shia. Doctrinal purity is their paramount goal. The vast majority of the 25k people/year killed by jihadists are Shia targeted by Sunni radicals.
Islam as it is practised in the West is pretty docile and tolerant. There are exceptions, but for the most part, they tolerate Shia, Ahmadis etc. So barring Muslims from the US will not really solve any problems. Because compared to the Muslim world, the US especially does not have a jihadist problem. Nor is it likely to in the future.
People should be far more concerned w/ fentanyl deaths, the 30k people killed every year in car crashes, gun deaths, death from infection and medical errors. These are the things that can be addressed.
As for jihadism in the Muslim world, I place most of the blame on Iran and Saudi fighting their proxy wars for the past 35 years. It is getting hotter.
Bogleman wrote:
People should be far more concerned w/ fentanyl deaths, the 30k people killed every year in car crashes, gun deaths, death from infection and medical errors. These are the things that can be addressed.
This is my least favorite argument. These things AND terrorism should be addressed. It's not either or.
Bogleman wrote:
As for jihadism in the Muslim world, I place most of the blame on Iran and Saudi fighting their proxy wars for the past 35 years. It is getting hotter.
You aren't making sense. You say it's the fault of Sunnis, then you blame BOTH a Sunni and Shia country.
Plus we are talking about jihadism in the WESTERN WORLD. I don't think either Iran or Saudi can claim a victory in some proxy war against each other when a bunch of gays get shot up in Florida.