Don't attack the hospital wrote:
they delete comments wrote:I wrote a comment on their page questioning my ability, or lack thereof, to trust that they don't employ people who cheated to get their medical qualifications. They deleted that post.
Are we not allowed to question how they screen and make sure that their employees have the credentials they claim? What if they say they went to school for 3 years but nobody every saw them in class or even heard of them? Do they care?
I wouldn't post on the health network's page. They have nothing to do with DQ decisions. Post on the marathon's page instead.
Sure they do. If one of the races sponsor pulls their funding because of decisions made by the race director, it would have a much stronger impact on the decisions they make than anything a random person posting on the race's wall.
It's a reality of advertising. The events/organizations/athletes a company sponsors reflect that companies values/views etc. If a company sponsors an event that is seen to allow people to cheat, that reflects poorly on the sponsor, to whom it's name is attached. When Armstrong was accused of cheating his sponsors initially stood by him, until public pressure , image and the truth made it damaging for them to continue to do so. When Tiger Woods was caught cheating, sponsors started dropping him like crazy. Being associated with a cheat is bad for business.