I don't think it's dumb. There are 9 women who have broken 2:20 in this field and that doesn't count Obiri or Lokedi. If they all run their best, no American finishes in the top 5.
I don't think it's dumb. There are 9 women who have broken 2:20 in this field and that doesn't count Obiri or Lokedi. If they all run their best, no American finishes in the top 5.
It's not really dumb but is irrelevant. We have 3 women going to Paris and 2 men. It was referring to- we need a man to finish top 5 to get the 3rd in to Paris.
Is that correct? I think in context to what it was replying to that was obvious.
I don't think it's dumb. There are 9 women who have broken 2:20 in this field and that doesn't count Obiri or Lokedi. If they all run their best, no American finishes in the top 5.
You don’t think it’s dumb because you are also dumb, Robert.
There will be several American men that will run faster than the women’s winning time today. That’s not being “lucky”.
I don't think it's dumb. There are 9 women who have broken 2:20 in this field and that doesn't count Obiri or Lokedi. If they all run their best, no American finishes in the top 5.
You don’t think it’s dumb because you are also dumb, Robert.
There will be several American men that will run faster than the women’s winning time today. That’s not being “lucky”.
It's safe to assume he misread it. So just stop it, everyone.