Did Mike Rossi (viral marathon dad) cheat his way into Boston?

jwem wrote:

xtugreenfan wrote:

No one here actually spoke to anyone who reviewed Mike's results, so all of this is just wishful thinking and pointless gossip. You keep listening to Ken who is now serving diet cokes for a living, it's the blind leading the blind. This is why Mike will never show you evidence, NOTHING WILL SATISFY YOUR WITCH HUNT. You want to believe so badly that he cheated and is a bad guy, but you keep coming up short. I'll say it again, he was exonerated and was even given an apology for the hassle it caused him. Mike has moved on and is living a great life. But you continue to stalk him as if that will change the truth.

Many, many people have reviewed Mike's results. The results overwhelming prove that he cheated. No evidence Mike can show people will "satisfy" them because, Mike cheated and there is no evidence to show that he didn't cheat. I do agree, Mike lied and said he had evidence, that happened, but, that is just more evidence of his cheating. He lies about it. Different lies. Different stories. That's what cheaters do. Lie. Nobody exonerated him, that's just another lie. Lying about it this is just more evidence of cheating. Cheaters lie.

Also, you are saying that Mike is happy living under this cloud of shame and subjecting his wife and children to this cloud of shame? If that is true, then he's a worse person then people say he is. What father could be happy having this reputation (as a cheater and a liar) to leave for his children? You are seriously saying that Mike Rossi is happy bringing shame to his family? Really? Bringing shame on his family makes his life great? That is messed up - because most people, they want a legacy their children could be proud of - instead - "yeah, timing mats are named after my dad, Rossi mats. They are there to prevent people from cheating like my dad did. VIA marathon spends money every year now, money that presumably would otherwise have gone to charity, on having a bunch of Rossi mats. That's because of my dad. Makes me proud."

If that's a great life for Mike - good for him. I can't imagine it would be for most fathers in this world.

printer wrote:

printer wrote:

Mikey thinks he's better off than his trolls. In his tiny narcissistic brain, he thinks that everyone is worse than him. How deluded he is.

Heck, I'll personally travel to Rydal and compare 1040's with Mikey to prove it. All he has to do is post his GPS files from the VIA marathon and that Turkey Trot here.

Unfortunately for him, he loses both ways.

What Mikey, too much of a pu$$y to actually have a man to man talk? Go ahead and keep picking on the likes of poor poor Kenny while you spend your days and nights hiding from the real people with real facts.

Most of us are out there every day putting our family first in order to give them a better life. However, you would rather throw the self esteem of your wife and kids in the gutter just to promote the brand formerly known as Mike Rossi.

Now, your universe is limited to a bunch of blue brides, Tennessee glam lovin' skanks and pornbots. Enjoy your miserable days.

xtugreenfan wrote:

Inconvenient Truth wrote:

I apologize for reposting, but wanted to include some important tweets regarding the photo issue.

As I recall from a posted email exchange between Mike Rossi and Abingtonrunner, you Mike Rossi (since you are Mike Rossi, just as WAAA is Mike Rossi, as was greenfan [a handle from a long time ago] and countless other handles) wrote that the Committee gave YOU a flashdrive of photos from U.S. Candids that "did not make the final cut."

There are a few problems with your (xtugreenfan) statement above and the email exchange with abingtonrunner.

1. You now are claiming that you showed evidence rather than the Committee gave you evidence. Of course the assertion that the Committee gave you evidence was problematic.

2. The claim that you made in that email with abingtonrunner was odd, that is, that the Committee provided you with photographic evidence that you were on the course. Why would they have to have any meeting with you if those photos showed you on the course? More importantly, if they had photos showing you on the course, and the best evidence against you was that you did not show up in one single U.S. Candid photo except at the finish line, when every other runner had at least one or more photos, why didn't they state affirmatively that the Committee has visual evidence that Mr. Rossi was on the course and here are the photos as proof? There is incontrovertible evidence that you were the only runner at seven different photo checkpoints that was not photographed. Sure, its possible they may have missed you in one, maybe two points, but missed you in every single photo checkpoint? Not a chance.

3. Abingtonrunner also posted and provided an email and phone conversation details with the head of U.S. Candids who explicitly stated that ALL PHOTOS taken during the VIA race were placed online. There was not some batch that did not make the final cut.

4. Just because you say so doesn't make it so. It is lame to say we will not be satisfied. We aren't satisfied because you claim to have evidence yet like a petulant brat in elementary school, you won't share. You area all talk with NOTHING to back it up. You are the one who wants to be a runner, a competitor, and an athlete. To sit there in front of your computer and claim that you have evidence yet refuse to share means only two things. First, you don't have any evidence whatsoever. Second, you did not run the entire 26.2 miles at the VIA marathon. No one in their right mind who had exculpatory (Mike, try googling that word) evidence would continue to hold on to it at this point. If I were you, not only would I have the incentive to clear my name and reputation, but I would show this so called evidence just to get the joy of proving everyone wrong.

5. YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE, just illusions of grandeur.

Hopefully you can read this. Mike tries to get support from Cecily Tynan about being the only runner at VIA who does not have one single photo on the course (besides the finish line). He tries to say this is common and some winner in the past at VIA had this occur, yeah, another lie.

Enjoy -

http://imgur.com/ALU41pw

If abingtonrunner is out there, perhaps he can repost the email(s).

No one here actually spoke to anyone who reviewed Mike's results, so all of this is just wishful thinking and pointless gossip. You keep listening to Ken who is now serving diet cokes for a living, it's the blind leading the blind. This is why Mike will never show you evidence, NOTHING WILL SATISFY YOUR WITCH HUNT. You want to believe so badly that he cheated and is a bad guy, but you keep coming up short. I'll say it again, he was exonerated and was even given an apology for the hassle it caused him. Mike has moved on and is living a great life. But you continue to stalk him as if that will change the truth.

xtugreenfan wrote:

Inconvenient Truth wrote:

I apologize for reposting, but wanted to include some important tweets regarding the photo issue.

As I recall from a posted email exchange between Mike Rossi and Abingtonrunner, you Mike Rossi (since you are Mike Rossi, just as WAAA is Mike Rossi, as was greenfan [a handle from a long time ago] and countless other handles) wrote that the Committee gave YOU a flashdrive of photos from U.S. Candids that "did not make the final cut."

There are a few problems with your (xtugreenfan) statement above and the email exchange with abingtonrunner.

1. You now are claiming that you showed evidence rather than the Committee gave you evidence. Of course the assertion that the Committee gave you evidence was problematic.

2. The claim that you made in that email with abingtonrunner was odd, that is, that the Committee provided you with photographic evidence that you were on the course. Why would they have to have any meeting with you if those photos showed you on the course? More importantly, if they had photos showing you on the course, and the best evidence against you was that you did not show up in one single U.S. Candid photo except at the finish line, when every other runner had at least one or more photos, why didn't they state affirmatively that the Committee has visual evidence that Mr. Rossi was on the course and here are the photos as proof? There is incontrovertible evidence that you were the only runner at seven different photo checkpoints that was not photographed. Sure, its possible they may have missed you in one, maybe two points, but missed you in every single photo checkpoint? Not a chance.

3. Abingtonrunner also posted and provided an email and phone conversation details with the head of U.S. Candids who explicitly stated that ALL PHOTOS taken during the VIA race were placed online. There was not some batch that did not make the final cut.

4. Just because you say so doesn't make it so. It is lame to say we will not be satisfied. We aren't satisfied because you claim to have evidence yet like a petulant brat in elementary school, you won't share. You area all talk with NOTHING to back it up. You are the one who wants to be a runner, a competitor, and an athlete. To sit there in front of your computer and claim that you have evidence yet refuse to share means only two things. First, you don't have any evidence whatsoever. Second, you did not run the entire 26.2 miles at the VIA marathon. No one in their right mind who had exculpatory (Mike, try googling that word) evidence would continue to hold on to it at this point. If I were you, not only would I have the incentive to clear my name and reputation, but I would show this so called evidence just to get the joy of proving everyone wrong.

5. YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE, just illusions of grandeur.

Hopefully you can read this. Mike tries to get support from Cecily Tynan about being the only runner at VIA who does not have one single photo on the course (besides the finish line). He tries to say this is common and some winner in the past at VIA had this occur, yeah, another lie.

Enjoy -

http://imgur.com/ALU41pw

If abingtonrunner is out there, perhaps he can repost the email(s).

No one here actually spoke to anyone who reviewed Mike's results, so all of this is just wishful thinking and pointless gossip. You keep listening to Ken who is now serving diet cokes for a living, it's the blind leading the blind. This is why Mike will never show you evidence, NOTHING WILL SATISFY YOUR WITCH HUNT. You want to believe so badly that he cheated and is a bad guy, but you keep coming up short. I'll say it again, he was exonerated and was even given an apology for the hassle it caused him. Mike has moved on and is living a great life. But you continue to stalk him as if that will change the truth.

xtugreenfan wrote:

Inconvenient Truth wrote:

I apologize for reposting, but wanted to include some important tweets regarding the photo issue.

As I recall from a posted email exchange between Mike Rossi and Abingtonrunner, you Mike Rossi (since you are Mike Rossi, just as WAAA is Mike Rossi, as was greenfan [a handle from a long time ago] and countless other handles) wrote that the Committee gave YOU a flashdrive of photos from U.S. Candids that "did not make the final cut."

There are a few problems with your (xtugreenfan) statement above and the email exchange with abingtonrunner.

1. You now are claiming that you showed evidence rather than the Committee gave you evidence. Of course the assertion that the Committee gave you evidence was problematic.

2. The claim that you made in that email with abingtonrunner was odd, that is, that the Committee provided you with photographic evidence that you were on the course. Why would they have to have any meeting with you if those photos showed you on the course? More importantly, if they had photos showing you on the course, and the best evidence against you was that you did not show up in one single U.S. Candid photo except at the finish line, when every other runner had at least one or more photos, why didn't they state affirmatively that the Committee has visual evidence that Mr. Rossi was on the course and here are the photos as proof? There is incontrovertible evidence that you were the only runner at seven different photo checkpoints that was not photographed. Sure, its possible they may have missed you in one, maybe two points, but missed you in every single photo checkpoint? Not a chance.

3. Abingtonrunner also posted and provided an email and phone conversation details with the head of U.S. Candids who explicitly stated that ALL PHOTOS taken during the VIA race were placed online. There was not some batch that did not make the final cut.

4. Just because you say so doesn't make it so. It is lame to say we will not be satisfied. We aren't satisfied because you claim to have evidence yet like a petulant brat in elementary school, you won't share. You area all talk with NOTHING to back it up. You are the one who wants to be a runner, a competitor, and an athlete. To sit there in front of your computer and claim that you have evidence yet refuse to share means only two things. First, you don't have any evidence whatsoever. Second, you did not run the entire 26.2 miles at the VIA marathon. No one in their right mind who had exculpatory (Mike, try googling that word) evidence would continue to hold on to it at this point. If I were you, not only would I have the incentive to clear my name and reputation, but I would show this so called evidence just to get the joy of proving everyone wrong.

5. YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE, just illusions of grandeur.

Hopefully you can read this. Mike tries to get support from Cecily Tynan about being the only runner at VIA who does not have one single photo on the course (besides the finish line). He tries to say this is common and some winner in the past at VIA had this occur, yeah, another lie.

Enjoy -

http://imgur.com/ALU41pw

If abingtonrunner is out there, perhaps he can repost the email(s).

No one here actually spoke to anyone who reviewed Mike's results, so all of this is just wishful thinking and pointless gossip. You keep listening to Ken who is now serving diet cokes for a living, it's the blind leading the blind. This is why Mike will never show you evidence, NOTHING WILL SATISFY YOUR WITCH HUNT. You want to believe so badly that he cheated and is a bad guy, but you keep coming up short. I'll say it again, he was exonerated and was even given an apology for the hassle it caused him. Mike has moved on and is living a great life. But you continue to stalk him as if that will change the truth.