Did Mike Rossi (viral marathon dad) cheat his way into Boston?

Flnlsher Medal wrote:

Let's not forget that he snitched on Ken to the Abington police for some Twitter posts. We could go on and on.

Ken threatened to show up at the kids school. Ken told Mike he had a shotgun with His name on it. The police took action.

Snitching on Ken just proves what a pathetic b*tch Mike Rossi really is. Cmon, Mike, you're not man enough to handle Ken face-to-face? No, you have to call the police because you felt like you were being bullied on Twitter - what a b*tch.

[quote]TroLLminator wrote:

Hi Mike - just grow a pair and say it's you. What is so hard about that? There is no one on this planet that would go out of their way like this to come to your defense, not even your aol lawyer, when it's crystal clear you are a scumbag cheater. Threatening people and harassing them online makes you an Internet tough guy. You can't stand that we discuss your cheating tactics here and call you out on it, so you finally decided to engage. So go ahead and explain to us how we've all got it wrong about your cheating. We can and have easily called BS on every single one of your claims and you won't provide the proof you apparently have except to say you were not DQd, what a solid defense.

I'm not Mike that's why I don't "grow a pair" and say I'm Mike.

You discuss "cheating tactics" that didn't make sense to those who investigated your theories.

If you were on any investigative board you would have seen my proof.

IanMacFurigh wrote:

Ken threatened to show up at the kids school. Ken told Mike he had a shotgun with His name on it. The police took action.

Which is obviously nothing like putting up clips on Twitter where characters threaten to kill people is it Mike ?

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

IanMacFurigh wrote:

Ken threatened to show up at the kids school. Ken told Mike he had a shotgun with His name on it. The police took action.

Which is obviously nothing like putting up clips on Twitter where characters threaten to kill people is it Mike ?

I don't know, ask Mike. I don't think it's the same though

IanMacFurigh wrote:

I'm not Mike that's why I don't "grow a pair" and say I'm Mike.

You discuss "cheating tactics" that didn't make sense to those who investigated your theories.

If you were on any investigative board you would have seen my proof.

"... MY proof."

Ooooops.

That is your interpretation of those posts. I'm not going to defend Ken he handled that himself. One thing Ken did was address him by name publicly when posting on Twitter. I guess the posting of mobsters with veiled threats, purchase of a holster for running with a gun as well as a pistol alongside a pork roast is much more manly.

Mike Ross wrote:

Snitching on Ken just proves what a pathetic b*tch Mike Rossi really is. Cmon, Mike, you're not man enough to handle Ken face-to-face? No, you have to call the police because you felt like you were being bullied on Twitter - what a b*tch.

Mike "handled Ken face to face" for a year remember ? Ken caused embarrassment and fell asleep on a job, the matter was handled with the same result as other managers at your and others place of employment would have handled it. Go to work today and go to sleep and see what happens.

Ken threatened to go to his kids school. What do you think that means to law enforcement in today's society? You don't think law enforcement would come knock on your door and have a chat with you if you publicly declared you were going to go to a school and do something?

Flnlsher Medal wrote:

Let's not forget that he snitched on Ken to the Abington police for some Twitter posts. We could go on and on.

I've not forgotten any of them but I realize that I need to KISS, keep it simple stupid, for Mike and his alter-egos. He has demonstrated his shortcomings when too much information is shared at once, computational skills are needed, and when analytics are involved. He is a DJ, enough said. He does not and cannot cope when too many facts are presented.

No Shortcuts wrote:

IanMacFurigh wrote:

I'm not Mike that's why I don't "grow a pair" and say I'm Mike.

You discuss "cheating tactics" that didn't make sense to those who investigated your theories.

If you were on any investigative board you would have seen my proof.

"... MY proof."

Ooooops.

He asked me to " grow a pair" and say I was Mike . Not oops, I I spoke in the 3rd person as if he was on an investigative board and I was Mike he would have seen my proof. Not oops.

ab5 wrote:

Yikes... Mike is quite a tool ( not to mention cheat)

Can't keep up with the various user names he's got going here, but it is pretty clear that this thread bothers him, as it should... I don't know how many unique users post here, but a good number of people have come to know him as a vain cheat, and the way this thread keeps bumping, that will just continue...

And ab5 is your 5th (?) name on here .

IanMacFurigh wrote:

No Shortcuts wrote:

"... MY proof."

Ooooops.

He asked me to " grow a pair" and say I was Mike . Not oops, I I spoke in the 3rd person as if he was on an investigative board and I was Mike he would have seen my proof. Not oops.

This sounds like DJ logic to me. If you are so passionate about this issue as to come on this board day after day why won't you share this proof? One GPS file, one picture or simply his Google history from that day.

Right, the whole world is wrong and all these articles are completely false rubbish. Mike stopping kidding yourself about your life of luxury as a wedding DJ. The truth is you are washed up and were left in the dust by Rippa decades ago. The best you could do to try to get back on television was to post a letter to a principal on FB, like a true coward because you never even mailed it. Think about that before you call anyone out for not saying things to your face.

IanMacFurigh wrote:

That article has as much correct information in it as the Warren Commission Report except the part where it said he ran a 20:25. Read the turkey trot results page if you don't believe me

Also dj's don't have to push play until Friday night thru Sunday basically a 15hr work week. The summer is especially great, while the rest of us are doing 40hrs they are out on their boat

Yep you're Mike. You cant even outright say that you ran that race honestly, from beginning to end... Instead you keep repeating that you were let off the hook. Does your peanut baron compute the difference?

IanMacFurigh wrote:

He asked me to " grow a pair" and say I was Mike . Not oops, I I spoke in the 3rd person as if he was on an investigative board and I was Mike he would have seen my proof. Not oops.

And herein lies your big problem, you think people are dumb enough to buy your excuses and when they don't you don't have the intelligence to own up.

Caught you Mike. It's too easy

IanMacFurigh wrote:

[quote]TroLLminator wrote:

You discuss "cheating tactics" that didn't make sense to those who investigated your theories.

If you were on any investigative board you would have seen my proof.

Mike's back y'all! ... Still in the game baby!

Some of his friends, and maybe even family are dumb enough... but really, trying to spread that BS on here??? It's what happens when you spin a web of lies Mike, you become emotional and volatile. All you had to do was come clean long ago and we wouldn't be here discussing the cheating legend Mike Rossi. Instead you immediately took to social media to sell your "accomplishment" that was completely based on cheating. People like you who try to get ahead by cheating and bulldozing others end up in such miserable situations and the only thing you could do is to victimize yourself. but go ahead, keep digging a bigger whole, I'm enjoying it.

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

IanMacFurigh wrote:

He asked me to " grow a pair" and say I was Mike . Not oops, I I spoke in the 3rd person as if he was on an investigative board and I was Mike he would have seen my proof. Not oops.

And herein lies your big problem, you think people are dumb enough to buy your excuses and when they don't you don't have the intelligence to own up.

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

IanMacFurigh wrote:

He asked me to " grow a pair" and say I was Mike . Not oops, I I spoke in the 3rd person as if he was on an investigative board and I was Mike he would have seen my proof. Not oops.

And herein lies your big problem, you think people are dumb enough to buy your excuses and when they don't you don't have the intelligence to own up.

You all think everyone is Mike. So what does it matter really anyhow weather I am, or anyone else is. In fact Mike hasn't told me to shut up or stop posting, so I guess he doesn't care that you think I'm him.

For the next 500 pages you guys will all be posting the same stuff and so will all " the Mikes.

Mike doesn't even need to stop by here it's like he threw a cigar butt into the weeds on the way home from the yacht club and the fire is raging behind him but why put it out. I did the similer thing when I was 12yrs old. Throw a whole ham into a yard with 5 dogs in it and watch them fight for my own entertainment