lolcat wrote:
I agree that medals are more impressive than times and records.
But when you scroll through the posts on this board, there is a real double standard that people like to use to take athletes down a peg after they've done something remarkable: with a runner like Rowbury, someone swoops in to say "well, no medals," while with a runner like Centro, someone swoops in to say "well, it was a slow time," or "well, he got beat in Monaco that time."
What gives?
BECAUSE HATERS GONNA HATE.
KLJNHRTGH wrote:
wooooo HOOOOOO 6TH PLACE!
Actually it was 5th place and the American Record
Now please share with us your amazing track and field accomplishments so we can all applaud you
Aw, C'mon. Simpson has the medals, and to my eye is cuter than Rowbury. Subjective opinion.
Time means something, even more than medals in some cases. I recently received a plaque for placing 2nd overall in a 5 mile race and my time was not fast. I'd rather have a faster 5 mile PR. Congrats Shannon! Was rooting for you!
Requester of BLACK pages wrote:
BLACK PAGE FOR ROWBURY OR I WILL CRY SEXISM!
Black page for Ayana or I will cry racism? or Xenophobia.
Big Red wrote:
Aw, C'mon. Simpson has the medals
Rowbury has two world championship medals, 2 American Records and faster times at 800, 1500 and 5000
Nobody cares. The board barely noticed. She's so deeply anticharismatic and paired with a shady coach so shady
We were so much more stoked when solinsky broke 27 or shalane broke the AR.
Enh. wrote:
It's just hard to be excited about anybody with Salazar. Maybe they're clean?even if they are they all seem like sellout robots
+1
NOP supertramp wrote:
Enh. wrote:It's just hard to be excited about anybody with Salazar. Maybe they're clean?even if they are they all seem like sellout robots
+1
Robots? Have you listened to a Centro interview? That guy is off the wall. Easily a more interesting interview than any other American middle distance runner.
As for Shannon, she conducts herself as well as anyone in interviews. Certainly more open and cordial than Jenny or even Molly Huddle.
You seem to me like someone who doesn't really follow the sport, you just read a few threads on these boards and form a half-cocked opinion.
Big Red wrote:
Aw, C'mon. Simpson has the medals, and to my eye is cuter than Rowbury. Subjective opinion.
I think Simpson cuter too, but I'd bet Rowbury is more fun in the bedroom.
A dog wrote:
Rowbury will get a medal for 2012 once confirmed dopers are dq'ed
Yes
I find it funny that people are making this a continuation of the rivalry between Shannon and Jenny -- even though Jenny has done almost nothing at the 5,000m distance, and doesn't seem to be too interested in it, either.
The real rivalry here is with Molly Huddle, who just lost her American record. Molly will have her revenge, though.
Rojo please ISP check this stiff. Complete BS.
gwaff wrote:
Yeah, when Simpson is busted, Rowbury will get her bronze.
Agree
KLJNHRTGH wrote:
wooooo HOOOOOO 6TH PLACE!
lolcat wrote:
I agree that medals are more impressive than times and records.
But when you scroll through the posts on this board, there is a real double standard that people like to use to take athletes down a peg after they've done something remarkable: with a runner like Rowbury, someone swoops in to say "well, no medals," while with a runner like Centro, someone swoops in to say "well, it was a slow time," or "well, he got beat in Monaco that time."
What gives?
Why are you pretending this is difficult or that there is a double standard? It's clear that people like runners to have BOTH fast times and medals. One is not necessarily better than the other. They both solidify and reinforce each other. Bekele - there is no doubt about him because he has fast times AND medals. This isn't complicated. It is not a double standard. It is not hating.
That was an impressive run, especially considering that Rowbury has been at it since indoors this year. I wonder if she will begin transitioning to the 5000 looking forward to 2020.
rojo wrote:
Requester of BLACK pages wrote:BLACK PAGE FOR ROWBURY OR I WILL CRY SEXISM!
Black page for Ayana or I will cry racism? or Xenophobia.
Why would Ayana get a black page?
simpson fan wrote:
As Rojo said on the other thread, a bit anticlimactic when you lose by more than 30 seconds.
Two ARs but zero Olympic medals.
Who you rather be Simpson (world champ, olympic medallist) or Rowbury (zero Olympic medals)? Answer: Simpson.
Hmm you forgot her Berlin Bronze... and she is owed an Olympic Bronze from 2012.
Now she has the AR in 1500, AR at 5k, Olympic Medal, and World Medal...
I don't even like Rowbury and your comment is just pathetic.
Jenny 2x World Medal, 1x Olympic Medal, and 3:57/9:12 to her credit. Career wise I'd probably give the nod to Rowbury unless Jenny runs an AR or gets another World's medal.
Agreed. I'm always rooting for Jenny over Shannon, but the anti-Shannon bias on these boards is so blatant. Shannon actually seems like a really cool person, it's her coach that's so off-putting. But with the exception of the near-miss in Rio, it's hard for even the most fervent Shannon haters to ignore how well she's been running this year.
That said, I'd love to see Jenny take a serious crack at the 5,000 AR. Her PR is only 14:56 but she's beaten up on Senbere Teferi in the past, who beat Shannon by 10 seconds here. It would be cool if Molly tried to get it back too, before she moves up for good. The women's 5,000m AR seems to slightly lag behind the other distance events, so hopefully Shannon's run today inspires some of her competition to lower it in the future.
