Fffffff wrote:
Not long ago I started running only by effort, in the sense that I never check my pace in the middle of a run, I only go by effort. If it’s intervals I look at the watch only after each rep to see the time. If it’s a long run then only at the end of the run. I find running like this makes much more sense and also easier mentally and more accurate in the sense that not each day is the same- some days it’s windy, some days you feel heavier etc...
As long as you check your splits at the end of each rep to get feedback that your "effort" calibration is in line, I think it's a great idea. It can also give clues to overtraining or other problems. If you run for effort, and when you check your watch at the end of the long run, and you're 10 minutes slower than usual, it's a clue something else isn't going right in your training.
I disagree with TheJeff about running on heart rate. I know it's a sample size of three (myself twice, and another runner I know) that tried heart rate training, and in retrospect, heart rate can be all over the place for a lot of reasons. I guess actually I don't have a problem using it as a training tool, but it's a pretty horrible racing tool. I've been well above my target heart rate in multiple races and never crashed and burned. I shouldn't say I've never crashed and burned, but never when my heart rate was telling me to shut it down. And a friend I had was religious about heart rate, and held herself back for most of a marathon, and finished fresh and feeling great, about 10 minutes slower than she was aiming for.