So you're bitter because you got cut from your college team, and now you think that all NCAA sports are terrible. The reality is that Cross Country / Track and Field would be in terrible shape in this country if it wasn't for the television contracts that pay for all of the championships in ever sport in every division. Any CC/T&F athletes who ever went to a national championship over the 20 to 30 years had their trip primarily paid for by the NCAA / March Madness TV contract, not their individual school. People think that the NCAA is some separate organization that rules over the colleges. The NCAA is actually an organization of the colleges. The schools decide how the NCAA enforces their policies. Maybe some of the highest level college athletes are being exploited by their schools and could get paid, but the number of CC/T&F athletes who would fall into this category are minimal.
Regarding UW limiting their meets to collegiate athletes, why is this wrong? The meets are held primarily for competitive opportunities for their athletes. It's not the college's job to give post-collegiate athletes a meet schedule. Pro athletes will always find places to compete, and are not competing on a level playing field to the collegiate. Other open athletes have to find other places to run. I go to some Indoor meets that last for hours, and part of the time is watching older people run very slowly. In no other sport do post-collegiates compete with kids still in school. College golf tournaments don't allow just anyone to enter. College athletes compete against other college athletes. Those older can compete against their peers in club tournaments. Why should Cross Country and Track be different?