Heh, here is FB "asking" banks to share data....
Facebook has asked several large US banks to share detailed financial information about their customers, including checking account balances and card transactions, as part of a new push to offer new services to its users, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Wonder what happens on the other end from their "friends" in DC if the banks refuse.....
https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-to-banks-give-us-your-data-well-give-you-our-users-1533564049I'm a former journalist and as Free Press as a person can be, but these private businesses have every right to shut him down if they want.
He isn't prohibited from publishing. He can print stuff and hand them out on street corners if he wants to.
Social media owners and even media owners can decide to publish what they want. The government just can't prohibit HIM from publishing or speaking. Social media has prohibited lots of stuff on their sites including stuff from liberals. Hardly new.
Ciro wrote:
I can't believe he's only 44, why does he look like that?
Wow. I can not either. I would have guessed 58-60. He looks like hell for a 44 year old.
Ciro wrote:
rallies. wrote:
I think this is where we should be very wary of these tech monopolies and am surprised people cannot see what is going on. Facebook has a massive influence on what people see on a daily basis, however the guy calling the shots is a smart programmer but nothing more. Meanwhile as per the recent dispatches programme things like horrifying self harm are left up and given an advisory warning. I think things are too skewed towards these powerful companies, we should be wary.
You'll be closing your facebook account no doubt.
Closed for 7 years after I worked out what was going on and saw the site for what it was.
I am totally not a fan of this guy and I am about an anti hate speech as anyone out there, but I do have an honest question.
How can these arguments be made in this case, but not in the case of the Colorado baker? They seem like the same arguments, but now each side of the aisle has swapped talking points, you know?
Again, I am glad this guy is outta here, but I also can't help but feel a tinge of "the rules seem to be subjective."
Another example of THE LEFT’S GENOCIDAL HATRED OF #trupatriot TRUTH SAYERS!!!
Save us from the tyanny, john fitzgerald kennedy junior!
Flagpole wrote:
Ciro wrote:
I can't believe he's only 44, why does he look like that?
Wow. I can not either. I would have guessed 58-60. He looks like hell for a 44 year old.
I know, absolutely hideous.
Not a Fan of this Guy wrote:
I am totally not a fan of this guy and I am about an anti hate speech as anyone out there, but I do have an honest question.
How can these arguments be made in this case, but not in the case of the Colorado baker? They seem like the same arguments, but now each side of the aisle has swapped talking points, you know?
Again, I am glad this guy is outta here, but I also can't help but feel a tinge of "the rules seem to be subjective."
Exactly. Like the right says. Let the Baker decide and facebook and twitter as well. This is a corporate issue
Almost There wrote:
Jones and the content of his various sites broke the policies of the social media outlets he was using. He was not censored; he was merely subjected to the rules he broke.
Now...if only Twitter had the stones to shut down Trump then the world would instantly be a more tolerable place.
But, leave up posts like Sarah Jeong's... got it.
Understood. But if all of Alex Jones’ supporters stopped using these services and assume there are enough supporters they would either have to shut their doors, lose a ton of money, or put him back on...
Flagpole wrote:
I'm a former journalist and as Free Press as a person can be, but these private businesses have every right to shut him down if they want.
He isn't prohibited from publishing. He can print stuff and hand them out on street corners if he wants to.
Social media owners and even media owners can decide to publish what they want. The government just can't prohibit HIM from publishing or speaking. Social media has prohibited lots of stuff on their sites including stuff from liberals. Hardly new.
Exactly, what they want. So whose to say the people at the top making the rules have not got an agenda? Are they not too big and influential? I wish people would wake up to the reality of the data they are freely passing over.
Government can still regulate social media.
Just like SFO is doing with plastic cocktail swords.
rallies. wrote:
Ciro wrote:
You'll be closing your facebook account no doubt.
Closed for 7 years after I worked out what was going on and saw the site for what it was.
A visionary, ahead of your time.
Of course, but are there FCC regulations prohibiting them from removing someone/something for violating their policies. And to avoid another dense comment let’s assume their policies align with laws and regulations.
Asdfghjkl wrote:
Understood. But if all of Alex Jones’ supporters stopped using these services and assume there are enough supporters they would either have to shut their doors, lose a ton of money, or put him back on...
Yeah good luck with that.
He's free to stand on a corner with a sign and scream what he believes. Or, host videos of himself talking on sites other than YouTube where, you know, he violated the terms of agreement.
What's the issue here?
rallies. wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I'm a former journalist and as Free Press as a person can be, but these private businesses have every right to shut him down if they want.
He isn't prohibited from publishing. He can print stuff and hand them out on street corners if he wants to.
Social media owners and even media owners can decide to publish what they want. The government just can't prohibit HIM from publishing or speaking. Social media has prohibited lots of stuff on their sites including stuff from liberals. Hardly new.
Exactly, what they want. So whose to say the people at the top making the rules have not got an agenda? Are they not too big and influential? I wish people would wake up to the reality of the data they are freely passing over.
Well If you let monopolies form. Havent heard a single american concerned about that. All fines towards them come from europe
FFF wrote:
He's free to stand on a corner with a sign and scream what he believes. Or, host videos of himself talking on sites other than YouTube where, you know, he violated the terms of agreement.
What's the issue here?
There is no issue, except the eternal victim angle of the far right.
Isn’t FB and Twitter a big reason for Trumps success? That’s what a lot of the conservative pundits have said. Was he part of the various social media outlets agenda. If so, where’s the disconnect now. Jones and Trump occupy the same space socially and politically.
Ciro wrote:
rallies. wrote:
Closed for 7 years after I worked out what was going on and saw the site for what it was.
A visionary, ahead of your time.
No, that accolade goes to George Orwell ?
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday