WHy haven’t female athletes protested competing against men?

Because they’re democrats.

The truth is, there are many that are realizing the trap they are in. Speak up... get shut down.

Answer 5678 wrote:

Because they’re democrats.

Bingo

They don't have the balls.

Trooth wrote:

They don't have the balls.

Or because many of them may have balls as well. It is naïve to think that Caster is the only one.

Stand up for female rights! wrote:

Female athletes need to protest and boycott races containing men. People lacking female DNA and a female reproductive system are NOT female.

Woman Stand Up For Your Rights to Compete Against Other Females Only!

Managers Need to Do The Same Thing! Refuse to let your athletes compete against non- females.

Fix the random capitalization and it’ll seem less obnoxious.

Trooth wrote:

They don't have the balls.

The case of the Connecticut High School sprinters is literally a case of female athletes competing against men, and yet I see and hear nothing from Connecticut High School sprinters. Why aren't they protesting as a group? Why don't they organize? Why don't they just stay in their blocks?

Proof that women can't cooperate.

It's a conundrum for them.

This generation is so pro-everything-not-straight-white-male that they would be seen as bigoted. The alternative is to keep quiet and get beaten in races by men which, oddly enough is better than 2018's McCarthy-ism of being called a bigot.

Stand up for female rights! wrote:

Female athletes need to protest and boycott races containing men. People lacking female DNA and a female reproductive system are NOT female.

Woman Stand Up For Your Rights to Compete Against Other Females Only!

Managers Need to Do The Same Thing! Refuse to let your athletes compete against non- females.

If you're talking about the Semenya issue, it's because female middle distance runners don't make enough money to risk future race invites and sponsorship deals.

Who's gonna want to put themselves forward to become the public face of bigotry and hatred (despite the fact they're right). Even a few innocuous comments have caused a massive backlash, imagine if someone actually boycotted?

Might be better if there was some co-ordination, but there's no chance. It's not a team event, there would be hardly any takers because most are in it for what they can get, and if that's 4th and 5th behind a few male athletes, it's a lot better than not getting an invite.

Stand up for female rights! wrote:

People lacking female DNA and a female reproductive system are NOT female.

Nobody lacks female DNA.

Men have all the "female" DNA, plus additional DNA that makes us male. There is no DNA that females have that males lack.

Plus, if Semenya is in the race you've already got a great excuse when you trail in 7th.

Lynsey Sharp excuse factory wrote:

Plus, if Semenya is in the race you've already got a great excuse when you trail in 7th.

And, it's a great excuse when you don't get paid as much in winnings, and get overlooked by sponsors. I mean, where's the socialism when you need it? Duh!

The agents of the athletes should do it. Say to meet directors and media my female athletes compete against DNA females only.

Stand up! wrote:

The agents of the athletes should do it. Say to meet directors and media my female athletes compete against DNA females only.

Perhaps then, they'll be earning their 'cut'.

Stand up! wrote:

The agents of the athletes should do it. Say to meet directors and media my female athletes compete against DNA females only.

Yeah, and then they'll invite some different not very well known athletes to get kerb stomped by Semenya and friends.

This thread is a real sausage fest. And why do I doubt that the dicks commenting ever support any other women's rights?

My guess is that they know that if they come out against them that they will be beaten to crap on social media by social justice warriors.

Look what happens to conservative women and conservative blacks. They catch hell from others because they are not conforming.

The issue is a seriously tricky one. It is not as simple as XY and XX or ovaries and testicles. (Anyone who has not read Ross Tucker's posts from a couple of years ago really needs to do so. Sex is not as clear cut as most people think and gender is possibly more complicated.)

Spotted Dick wrote:

This thread is a real sausage fest. And why do I doubt that the dicks commenting ever support any other women's rights?

Sooo, how do feel about the issue brought up by the OP? Why the diversion?

They should be testing for excessive levels of testosterone. If your testosterone level is above the level of the average female and reaches the level of an average male you should be DQ'd.