Down goes Semenya!!!

I AM SAM wrote : Would the best fast bowler in international cricket also be on PEDs?

no to the above but if the fast bowlers are south african then a massive possibility

considering what is happening in track there and somewhat rugby so far .

maybe why the aussies started to tamper with ball and branded cheats when the real dirty ones rest easy.

at moment and after looking at commonwealth games would consider the aussies as by far cleaner nation than many there

the dope de jeur just has just not hit australia yet bar the obvious one of sally pearson , cant think of any others .

and why this dope not very common down under , well maybe due to sports that are popular and track is least .

aduck2022 wrote:

I AM SAM wrote : Would the best fast bowler in international cricket also be on PEDs?

no to the above but if the fast bowlers are south african then a massive possibility

considering what is happening in track there and somewhat rugby so far .

maybe why the aussies started to tamper with ball and branded cheats when the real dirty ones rest easy.

at moment and after looking at commonwealth games would consider the aussies as by far cleaner nation than many there

the dope de jeur just has just not hit australia yet bar the obvious one of sally pearson , cant think of any others .

and why this dope not very common down under , well maybe due to sports that are popular and track is least .

I wouldn't consider any South African the best bowler in world cricket. It is either Stark (who's brother won the Commonwealth games High Jump) or someone else. Most bowlers only bowl well in their own conditions.

Also, there is currently no accredited lab in Africa. This is a massive advantage to African athletes.

I Am Sam wrote:

Go ahead, blame everything on political correctness

Thanks mate.

Funny though, kinda makes all your other writings a bit pointless now you've said "Go ahead, blame everything on political correctness".

> This is not just about the "Big 3". The top 1/3 of participants in the 2011 and/or 2013 World Championships had free testosterone levels averaging 7.08 nmol/l. The new limit would be 5.00 nmol/l. This is talking about kicking out a very large percentage of current competitors.

Wrong.

Free testosterone is measured in pmol/l.

You are referring to testosterone.

The top 1/3 averaged 3.2 nmol/l and this is heavily skewed by the male athletes with testosterone levels around 30 nmol/l heavily outweighting women with 1 nmol/l.

> What if she continues to run in non international 800’s and either breaks the WR or clearly demonstrates that she is number one in the world.

He is a man. He has male body, male testosterone, male reproductive organs. Just misformed genitals (not really a vagina).

His results shouldn't interest anybody.

I Am Sam wrote:

Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:

[quote]HRH wrote:

To be fair, having your private parts as the topic of discussion around the world is probably depressing. But looking at that wedding clip Semenya is clearly the groom. It is David Haye without the facial hair. So I wonder whether this entire episode is the taking of the proverbial or a tragic example of terrible parenting. I also wonder if Semenya can father a child?

Surely you are taking the piss.

I think it has already been proven a long time ago that she has CAIS, or complete angrogen insensitivity syndrome, whereby even with the XY chromosome pairing , she has developed as a female, the external genitalia are that of female.

What do you think it means to be completely insensitive to androgens?

It means that your body doesn't masculinize at all in response to androgens. This is common with models, e.g., Hanne Gaby Odiele.

Normal women are androgen sensitive, but they have low androgen levels. Caster has a very masculine body and high androgen bodies. He is androgen sensitive.

What he has, simply, is misformed genitals due to a genetic mutation.

Am I confused here.

Is someone a misogynist if he supports Caster Semenya participating in womens races?

OR

Is someone a misogynist if he is against Caster Semenya participating in womens races?

I have heard it both ways.

Some say that if you support Semenya participating in womens races, you are putting the real women at a disadvantage, so you are against real women - hence a misogynist.

Some say that if you are against Semenya participating in womens races, then because Semenya identifies as a woman, you are against a woman - hence a misogynist.

Which one is it?

P.S. Asbel Kiprol is a drug cheat. He took exogenous PEDs (EPO). Caster Semenya is a drug cheat, he has endogenous PEDs (Testosterone). A lot of outrage against Kiprop, but very little against Semenya. Why?

This. Exactly the reason this ruling will not hold up with further scrutiny. It’s ridiculous on its face and clearly targets a single individual. Cannot figure out why they did not apply to all events. Hard to believe the level of incompetence that leads T&F.

acebond wrote:

Cannot figure out why they did not apply to all events. Hard to believe the level of incompetence that leads T&F.

Are you kidding or in fact simply an idiot? You don't need to figure anything out because the article which this entire thread has spun out from tells you why quite clearly.

Talk about incompetence...

Or 'someone else' haha. You know a lot don't you.

Rabada is pretty clearly in amazing form at the moment, and if he's a bit dark for you Philander isn't bad either.

Starc's test form hasn't been incredible recently, in terms of all competitions Trent Boult is probably a better.

Get life loser there are enough photos of her with obvious breasts......

Idiot, they're pec muscles.

trollism wrote:

Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:

I wouldn't consider any South African the best bowler in world cricket. It is either Stark (who's brother won the Commonwealth games High Jump) or someone else. Most bowlers only bowl well in their own conditions.

Also, there is currently no accredited lab in Africa. This is a massive advantage to African athletes.

Or 'someone else' haha. You know a lot don't you.

Rabada is pretty clearly in amazing form at the moment, and if he's a bit dark for you Philander isn't bad either.

Starc's test form hasn't been incredible recently, in terms of all competitions Trent Boult is probably a better.

Sorry to Mericans who dont know what cricket is....'slightly' bigger world sport than Baseball, Basketball and American Football combined

Yeah, subway Surfers addiction is a douchebag...

Rabada tops the PWC test bowling rankings, with Starc 13th....maybe the someone else is Anderson at second and Philander at 3rd (who is only slightly lighter in shade).

In 30 tests he has average 21.6, with nine 5 fors and four 10 fors.

Starc 43 tests at 28.2 with nine 5 fors and one 10 for.

Who is the match winner here?

...and by the way, with relevance to the earlier post doubting where these sprinters are coming from, and what they are on..

The Aussie commentator Ian Chappell asked a local commentator on air: "So which tribe does Rabada come from"?

Local commentator (as camera goes to Rabada's dad in stand): "Uhhhm...From one of the affluent suburbs. That is his dad, he is a neurosurgeon "

As the blacks are getting more education and sporting opportunities, scholarships at private schools etc, be prepared for a big wave of stars in next generation.

They will be over in US on scholarships too, slam dunking away...and you will then be cheering.