What would it roughly equate to?
What would it roughly equate to?
13.3-13.5
60m to 100m wrote:
What would it roughly equate to?
Look for your 100m to be in the 12.50-12.75 range.
Easy coversion wrote:
60m to 100m wrote:
What would it roughly equate to?
Look for your 100m to be in the 12.50-12.75 range.
And the CONVERSION is your 60m time X 1.54. Gets you real close, factoring out weather/wind.
13.26 100m
incorrect.
If your starts are normally good, then probably 13.5, but if you can't get out of the blocks for $hit and are still accelerating after 50m probably 13.2
60m to 100m wrote:
What would it roughly equate to?
60m to 100m
Please keep us updated. I would truly be surprised if you end up beyond the middle 12’s.
Also let us know your age and gender, that can have subtle impact, but speed is speed and I have been around sprinting a long time. An 8.13 to 60m rarely will fall apart so dramatically to cause so much disparity in the race to drop into the 13’s.
Lastly, assuming the 60m time was electronic, considering you listed hundredths.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!