I just did a workout were I did a 200 (In 36-37) with a 100 meter jog as rest I did 3 of these (200 hard+100 easy) and that was one "circuit" after each circuit, I got 2:00 rest instead of the 100m jog. I did 6 of those circuits for a total of 18 hard 200s. Also, I ran it on a grass course with a couple of small hills. Given this, what can I expect to run my 5k in at my first xc meet?
0/10
What?
18:30?
Like, I get it, it's not anything particularly amazing, but there's no need to be rude about it
It really means nothing without the context of other training. That's basically a long sprinter workout, and predicts nothing other than being able to run 18 200s. I can't even tell if you can continuously run a full 5k on this workout, and thus I can't predict a time
Dylan wrote:
What?
BTW, when someone writes X/10 it means they are calling you a troll. He thinks you asked this question to elicit a reaction of others.
Well, I've already ran faster than that last year, 17:54
In that context, at least 17:50. As I said, the workout predicts nothing. However, it is useful, just nonpredictive.
Yeah, that makes sense. I run 50 miles a week on average.
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday