I have never bet on a sporting event before. How much would I stand to make if I bet $1500 on McGregor?

It's a fixed fight, period.

Maxprotein wrote:

McGregor lost to Nate Diaz but is going to beat Floyd Mayweather. LOL.

Smell the Sauce wrote:

It's a fixed fight, period.

Maxprotein wrote:

McGregor lost to Nate Diaz but is going to beat Floyd Mayweather. LOL.

You say it's fixed because mcgregor isn't going to win??? Gtfoh.

The fighters mayweather has defeated in the past 10 years would get in a ring right now and beat the crap out of mcgregor.. name one of them that he would beat?

The money isn't in this fight - it's in the inevitable rematch. This is a best of three.

No, the money is in this fight AND a rematch. Laugh all you want suckers.

Karl Hungus wrote:

The money isn't in this fight - it's in the inevitable rematch. This is a best of three.

No friend I'm saying no such thing. You are absolutely correct about the fighters that he's fought over the last 10 years, no disagreement here. What I'm saying is the pre-fight press conferences are completely staged, 100%.The fight itself is an unknown to the average person placing a bet. Yes, Mayweather "should" win. But...this fight is about money and future money. What you think will happen probably won't. Put it this way. Take all the money that you have, everything. Put it on Mayweather to win, because he can't lose, right? If you are that confident, you'd do that, especially with the facts that you presented, which I agree with. Trust me, I'm old enough to tell you that yes, there are fights that are fixed and even the big ones. If I post names of fighters, you'll come back with "that was a long time ago", etc... Boxing has fixed fights, period, because in the end, it's all about money. If Conor wins, it'll be because he got lucky. If he loses, he was suppose to. If you're that confident, I encourage you to go SharkTale and Bet it all!!!!!!!!

Hermes link ice blue mink wrote:

Smell the Sauce wrote:

It's a fixed fight, period.

You say it's fixed because mcgregor isn't going to win??? Gtfoh.

The fighters mayweather has defeated in the past 10 years would get in a ring right now and beat the crap out of mcgregor.. name one of them that he would beat?

Boxing is a has-been legacy of 19th century gentlemanly rules barring wrestling and kicking. Besides being too unlike real fighting to be worth mastering, it is now known to cause fatal brain degeneration due to the repeated trauma. The gloves are bad, not good.

When Mayweather fought Pacquiao he backpedaled, evaded and clinched the whole time. He landed more blows, including counters, but none were effective. Boxing snobs were always there to point out the scoring rules, but that only underscored how it's just a sport, not a fight. MMA isn't that much better, but at least it's kickwrestleboxing instead of just boxing.

McGregor should tackle Mayweather and start beating him on the ground before the ref can stop him. Make him think outside the "box."

:16

2:27

5:11

6:13

7:31

9:10

6 of many several fake scripted moments on just one tape. The pretend hold back. The pretend I'm trying to get at him but am being held back by one arm and just can't break free:):):):) Scripted.

Rocky B wrote:

^ I agree. Mayweather has always technically sound guys. He doesn't know what to expect from a brawler like Conor.

Mayweather is going to struggle big time against a non-boxing specialist. All Conor needs to do is land one clean punch. Mayweather will need to make it go the distance to have a chance.

As if technically defficient brawlers have an advantage ... It makes tons of sense really ...

"One clean punch" - the whole point is that there's no way he lands one.

Mayweather fought guys like Cotto, Gatti, Mosley who punched hard and won 3/4+ of their fights by KO. Cotto punched really hard and is very solid boxer technically. He beat guys like Marquez, Pacquiao, Canelo, De la Hoya. This is the top tier of boxing in recent decades.

He always makes it go the distance. He's not a KO guy, although he can punch fine. He's a defensive specialist and a very smart boxer (despite being a dumb as hell illiterate woman beating miscreant). He's not going to walk into a punch. In this case, he'll probably draw it out for a few rounds before beating McGregor to the canvas.

Bad Wigins wrote:

Boxing is a has-been legacy of 19th century gentlemanly rules barring wrestling and kicking. Besides being too unlike real fighting to be worth mastering, it is now known to cause fatal brain degeneration due to the repeated trauma. The gloves are bad, not good.

When Mayweather fought Pacquiao he backpedaled, evaded and clinched the whole time. He landed more blows, including counters, but none were effective. Boxing snobs were always there to point out the scoring rules, but that only underscored how it's just a sport, not a fight. MMA isn't that much better, but at least it's kickwrestleboxing instead of just boxing.

McGregor should tackle Mayweather and start beating him on the ground before the ref can stop him. Make him think outside the "box."

Why should he tackle him and start beating him on the ground? That would just prove that he can't fight mayweather head up. It's a boxing match he would immediately lose by DQ and mayweather would laugh all the way to the bank 50-0. That would be the stupidest thing mcgregor could do.

Mayweather is not going to just "let" CM tackle him. You guys are funny!