Who cares what Nature thinks. This wasn't a bad article, but Nature has been publishing total crap recently. They are turning into the laughing stock of the scientific community.
Who cares what Nature thinks. This wasn't a bad article, but Nature has been publishing total crap recently. They are turning into the laughing stock of the scientific community.
The Law, Twisted wrote:
As were tramps like us.
10/10
slartibartfast wrote:
very interesting article....i wish they'd fleshed it out more, though. maybe there'll be a full article in the times this weekend.
on a related note, could this mean that there's a selection for efficient runners who do not get easily injured & that foot types(such as flat feet) that tend to become injured more often & seem to require special shoes are the result of recessive genes that have become more prominent b/c we no longer *have* to run & would have had a more difficult time surviving before the rise of civilization?
or have i gone completely off the deep end here?
& let's leave mr. "i don't believe in macro-evolution" to sit in his cave & twiddle his thumbs.
A lot of recessive genes have flourished because they no longer are detriments to survival.
Ha ha, you can google “mobility as instinct” for my piece. Only 700 words, real-life examples, and no copyright problems. Please?
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
Hats off to my dad. He just ran a 1:42 Half Marathon and turns 75 in 2 months!