One of the saddest things about the drug-era of the last 30 years is that it's hardwired into many running fans a reflexive suspicion of breakthrough performances, inspiring feats, amazing stories of personal triumph. Our heroes have disappointed us many times. Marion Jones, Justin Gatlin, Floyd Landis (cycling is a part of all this for running fans).....Mark McGuire, Sammy Sosa.
The sneers and questioning and slander you're hearing here is mostly frustrated idealism. People still want heroes. But nobody wants to be a fool.
Imagine for the sake of argument that Ritz's AR performance took place in a world where PEDs didn't exist; where there was no history of subsequent disillusionment of the sort I invoked in my first paragraph.
In that world, wouldn't Ritz's performance be just about the most exciting, inspiring thing that has happened to American distance running in several decades--something that, along with Ryan Hall's several fantastic races, confirms that we have entered a new era in which we can begin--BEGIN--to dare to dream of even greater things?
In such an alternate universe, you'd come to a website like Letsrun and find nothing but dazzled fans and peers; nothing but people blessed by an inspiring performance from a supremely talented runner who, after more than his share of setbacks and naysayers, finally rose to exceed even the high (and disappointed) expectations with which he's been saddled for the past five years.
But we live in our universe, not that alternate universe.
And so when I think about the role that Letsrun plays, and I think about the commentary that has accrued to Ritz here, all I remember is the naysayers--with an occasional exception. I believe Flagpole was an exception. If I'm not wrong, Flagpole often found himself circled by baying hounds here when he defended Ritz against the charge of underperforming and kept insisting that one day we'd see truly great things from him.
Ritz was mocked mercilessly here for underperforming.
Now he has overperformed--he's outdone himself, a thing that deserves high praise from all sides--and the same posters who were mocking him for underperforming are slandering him for drugging.
Why doesn't he just shoot himself right now?
It's too bad that sport has come to this. It's too bad that so many of our heroes on the track have turned out to be cheaters. It's too bad that one acceptable response to athletic greatness these days is the cry "Drugs!"
It would be better if we lived in a world, an alternative universe, where we could all just be inspired by Ritz's sort of once-a-decade performance.
Instead, we live in a universe where, I think, the wisest among us are willing to be what I'll call "conditionally inspired." A part of us is wildly inspired; another part hedges its bets, waiting for the other shoe to drop.
Only a true fool, though, sees every exceptional performance and thinks "Drugs!" That's a sad, unoriginal response. It's the response of a small child who has been disappointed repeatedly by his parents and thinks, as a result, that the rest of his life must be filled with inwardly raging melancholia.
There's a lot of that melancholia here at Letrun; it expresses itself as threads that begin "Is Ritz Drugging??!!"
That's like writing "Is Santa Claus Dead??!!"
A realist knows that some inspiring performances are, in fact, inspiring performances, not shadow-plays stoked by PEDs.
I'm a realist. I think we're living in a great day and will see greater.