Franklin Jackson wrote:
You must be a troll. In the unlikely event that you are serious, you either do not understand the sport or haven't been paying attention if you think Rupp isn't running at a much higher level than he was 2 years ago.
Arrogant, aren't we? Yes I must not know much about the sport. Does that make you feel better? Great!
Now please explain to me why running a 13:18 proves that he is at a much higher level than two years ago. Is it because it was indoors? Because he didn't run all out? Did he run an extra lap? Was it because he beat Chelanga by 1 second? The same guy who ran a 27:10 a couple weeks ago. Oh wait, my bad, he ran 27:28. Right around where Rupp would've run had he been in the race.
Was it because he showed guts winning 4 NCAA titles? Lets throw in some of the merit badges he won. Maybe they prove he is way better than 27:33? Because nothing he has done on the track proves he is way better than two years ago. You know alot about track. Please tell me.