The Week That Was in Running, March 11 – March 17, 2019
March 20, 2019
Past editions of the Week That Was can be found here.
If you missed our coverage of the Olympic qualifying changes, the United Airlines NYC Half, and the Bahrain Night Half Marathon, catch up now.
- LRC Our Worst Fears Realized: USATF WILL NOT Honor Top-Three Finish At The US Olympic Trials Unless You Have The Standard
- LRC Top American Pros And Coaches React To USATF’s New Olympic Qualification Process: “For our Trials it takes a lot of excitement out of it.”
- LRC Surprise Win For #1,163 Belay Tilahun, Domination For World Record Holder Joyciline Jepkosgei At United Airlines NYC Half
- LRC Paul Chelimo Wants To Do 5,000/10,000m Double At Worlds, Speaks Out Against Olympic Qualifying Changes
- LRC Chaos Reigns At Inaugural Bahrain Night Half Marathon: Jemal Yimer Costs Himself $75K By Stopping Early As Elites Dodge Cars & Pedestrians
It’s Hard To Make This Up: The IAAF Is TOTALLY Focused on Promoting Its World Rankings…Which USATF Says It Will Largely Ignore / The IAAF Greatly Increases The Toughness of Its Olympic Standards Four Years After Relaxing Them
The biggest news over the last week plus has obviously been the changes in the Olympic qualification system and USATF’s braindead decision to not honor the world rankings if there are at least three people in an event who have hit the new, tougher Olympic standards. So USATF will take the 10th placer at the Trials who has the standard over the 1st placer who is ranked 10th in the world but doesn’t have it. Brilliant.
We’ve been covering the controversy in great detail on the front page so we will try to not spend too much time on it in this column, but we do want to make a couple of key points.
In July, when the IAAF announced that it would shortly be coming out with a world ranking system, it wrote this:
“Entry standards will be approved and published later this year, but will be set for the sole purpose of qualifying athletes with exceptional performances unable to qualify through the IAAF world rankings pathway.”
(Many thanks to LetsRun.com visitor Patrick Kelly for pointing that out to us)
So basically, in the IAAF’s mind, the standards are an insurance policy for a star who has been out of action with injury or pregnancy or for a superstar up and comer. If injuries and pregnancies and rising teenage stars didn’t exist, the IAAF would probably prefer that 100% of the Olympic qualification be done via the rankings as it wants to market world rankings. So everything the IAAF has been doing is to emphasize its new rankings system and yet last Friday USATF said it won’t pay much attention to them. That’s just stupid and could greatly impact the drama of the Trials.
And remember, for the last Olympics, the geniuses in charge of our sport did the opposite of what they are doing now. They relaxed the Olympic standards for many events, including the marathon. As a result, USATF had to relax its standards due to an arbitration ruling that USATF wasn’t allowed to have standards for its trials stricter than the Olympic standards.
As long as the IAAF tweaks a few things (like granting the top three at the US and Japanese Olympic marathon trials automatic Olympic qualification status and increasing the ranking bonus points given to the US Olympic track and field trials), we’d be ok with the IAAF’s use of a ranking system rather than arbitrary times for Olympic qualification. While we don’t understand why the IAAF doesn’t let a country send any three athletes if they are going to send three anyway (see the next section), the world ranking system would for the most part mean the Olympic Trials were still full of drama.
Our article on USATF’s decision not to honor world rankings if there are three athletes with the standard went viral and generated a lot of response from our visitors. One of our favorites came from an LRC visitor who succinctly offered a simpler way to qualify for the Olympics. Here is what James wrote to us after reading our article:
In terms of a call to action, this is the best paragraph I’ve read from your coverage of the Olympic changes:
The IAAF should let the US (or any country for that matter) with three qualified athletes in an event send any three athletes it wants in that event (regardless of whether the athletes they send actually have the standard). If the US is going to be sending three athletes to the Olympics in an event anyway, why does the IAAF care which three it sends?
I think that’s a great thing to advocate. Why even have a standard for rejecting an entry? It’s not like countries will start sending their worst athletes if we remove the standards. I know their qualification has been different from the US, but case in point: Jamaica was smart enough to send Bolt after his injury caused him to miss their trials.
Olympics should be: We show up with our picks (team). You show up with yours. We’ll see who wins. See you again in 4 years.
James intuitively understands that in virtually every sport we know of, each team is responsible for picking its own players. So here is our simple solution. Use the IAAF world rankings to figure out how many spots each country gets, as there is a hard cap on the number of Olympic track & field spots (reduced from 2,005 athletes in Rio to 1,900 in Tokyo). Then let each country send who they want. In an ideal world, this would solve the problem, but we’re sure there are a few boneheaded federations who would use it as an excuse to select inferior athletes. So we understand why some may want a system that ensures that every athlete has a body of work in order to be eligible to compete at the Olympics.
As for James’ bio, it’s pretty interesting. He writes that he “grew up in an area where it wasn’t a sport if it didn’t have a ball so I didn’t pick up running until my late 20s. I became a fan of running when I realized how impressive a random ’13:01 5ker from Senegal’ is, and then naturally stumbled across your site a few years ago.”
Our Simple Solution To The Diamond League 5000/3000 Controversy
The IAAF’s decision to get rid of the 5000 at the Diamond League and apparently replace it with a flat 3000 is also stupid. We don’t want to see a flat 3000 in the Diamond League. The IAAF wants to cut four events from the Diamond League, but they’re not truly cutting the 5000; they’re just replacing it with a non-Olympic event. Who in the world thought this was a good idea? No one who understands or appreciates distance running.
So if we were picked to choose between six 3000’s on the DL circuit or no distance events (above the mile) at all, we’d honestly say no distance events.
When we spoke to the IAAF last week, they kept telling us that they need to get rid of the 5000 for two reasons — to save time, as they are going to reduce the TV window from two hours to 90 minutes; and because they want to hold each event six times. They are trying to promote a singular format for TV and said the top stars don’t want to race six 5000s.
Guess what? The athletes don’t want to run six 3000s either. Also, we as fans don’t want to see six 3000s. Why? Because they end up being watered down. No athlete trying to peak for the end of the season wants to race that many distance races before Worlds/Olympics so they’ll skip out on competing at some and then you don’t get compelling matchups.
Here’s a simple solution. There are 12 Diamond League meets and there are potentially four distance events to run at each Diamond League — men’s and women’s steeplechase and men’s and women’s 5000s. If you put just one distance event in each Diamond League, it would work perfectly as each event would be held three times during the season (plus a fourth in the DL final). The distance event that is held gets more attention, and since the distance events would be contested half as many times as the other events, you could double the prize money in the distances. That way the big names would be less likely to skip it and we’d get more compelling matchups.
Run one in May, one in June, and one in July (personally we’d like for the middle one to be a 10,000 but we can’t be too greedy). That way, fans get to see how the stars look early in the season, in mid-season and then a few weeks before Worlds/Olympics. Fewer races is better as it prevents burnout and leaves drama for Worlds/Olympics. Plus there would be a maximum of 15 minutes of distance running at a single DL so there would be plenty of time to fit everything into the 90-minute TV window.
Should Brigid Kosgei Now Be Considered The Favorite For London?
It’s hard not to declare Brigid Kosgei the favorite for next month’s London Marathon.
Yes, normally when Mary Keitany is in a marathon, she’s the favorite. But Keitany didn’t run the RAK Half this year like she normally does as she’s a bit behind schedule and she’s now 37.
We’re sorry. As stacked as London is, unless you are 100%, you aren’t going to win it unless maybe your name is Eliud Kipchoge. And as great as she is, Keitany has only won one of her last four appearances in London.
Meanwhile, Kosgei has been on fire.
Since winning Chicago in 2:18:35 last fall (only Paula Radcliffe and Tirunesh Dibaba have ever run faster on that course), she won the Houston Half in a course-record 65:50 on January 20 and last weekend picked up a cool $100,000 by winning the inaugural Bahrain Night Half Marathon in 65:28. And she’s 25.
Yes, we know Vivian Cheruiyot won London last year (Kosgei was second) and yes, we know Cheruiyot ran a 66:34 course record to win in Lisbon last week, but 66:34 is slower than 65:28 and Cheruiyot’s victory in London resulted in large part because she paced herself better than Kosgei, not necessarily because she was fitter on the day. At 10k in London last year, Kosgei was 38 seconds up on Cheruiyot.
Messageboard Post Of The Week / Not Everything About The Bahrain Half Was Amazing
I consider myself a bit of a running nerd and I LIVE in Bahrain and I had no idea this was happening until I read the preview this morning. I still have no idea where the course was. Also interesting that this was held on the anniversary of the crushing of the Bahraini rebellion when Saudi tanks rolled into the country (at the request of the Bahrain king ) and put down the Arab spring.
-messageboard poster usnspecialist writing about how little advance publicity there was about the inaugural Bahrain Night Half Marathon, which had world-class fields and $358,000 in prize money.
Video of The Week
In case you didn’t see the bizarre ending of the men’s race at Bahrain Night Half Marathon for the men, here is the finish where Jimel Yimer celebrated at a false finish line and potentially cost himself $75,000.
Stat of the Week I
80 – number of men that will be allowed to compete in the 2020 Olympic marathon, down from the 155 that raced in 2016.
108 – number of men’s race walkers that we are projecting will compete in the 2020 Olympics between the 20k and 50k. The max allowed is 120 (60 per event) and in 2016 (when the max was 80 per event), 12 men doubled and did both.
Stat of the Week II
60 – number of race walkers that will compete in the women’s 20k in the 2020 Olympics.
95 – number of women that are world ranked in the women’s 20k race walk.
Stat of the Week III
180 – number of men who broke 66:00 at the Tachikawa City Half Marathon, this year’s Japanese University Half Marathon Championships, according to Brett Larner and Race Results Weekly.
265 – number of men who broke 66:00 at the same race in 2015 according to ARRS.
Tweet Of The Week
Is this the reason why IAAF is doing away with long distance events in the Diamond League?
— Katami Michelle (@MichKatami) March 12, 2019
Quotes of the Week (that weren’t quote of the day)
#1 Will The 5,000 and 10,000 Eventually Be Eliminated From The Olympics?
“First it was the 10,000m that was pushed off from the global stage, then the world cross country championship started to be staged biannually, changing from its original annual format, now it’s the 5000m which is barred from the sphere. One does not necessarily need to be an expert, to guess where this is heading towards; it is the World Championship and the Olympic Games, that we are going to hear the ban of these disciplines next.”
– Gebregziabher Gebremariam, former NYC Marathon champ and World XC champ, reacting to the IAAF dropping the 5000 from the Diamond League.
#2 We’re not the only ones who think cutting the 5000 is a bad idea
“This disconnect has been around forever. One writer noted that, in speaking to the changes, IAAF president Sebastian Coe said that the IAAF wants to make the Diamond League ‘more relevant to the world our fans live in today’, but were cutting the distance recreational distance runners most commonly ran.”
–Len Johnson writing in Runner’s Tribe.
#3 We’re not the only ones who love World XC
“World cross was the toughest race in the world because it put every top distance runner on the planet head to head — marathoners, milers, steeplechasers, mountain runners. In 1975, third place was a fierce battle between Bill Rodgers and John Walker. Soon after, Rodgers won the Boston Marathon and Walker broke the world mile record. As a baptism of fire for aspiring runners, nothing came hotter. In the junior men’s race of 1978, teenage Gelindo Bordin, later Olympic marathon champion, finished a modest 19th and teenage Said Aouita, later Olympic and world 5000 champion, was even further back in 34th. The great Haile Gebrselassie tried and failed six times to win at the world cross.”
-excerpt from Roger Robinson‘s Boiling Cauldron: 98 Years of the World Cross Country Championships, which was published in 2001.
#4 We’re not sure we agree with this analogy, but we have no doubts about whether Ezekiel Kemboi was really good
“What I am happy about with my career in the track is that I have already won the Olympic title, the world title, and the Commonwealth Games’ title. If it was soccer, this would be equal to winning a world cup.”
-Kemboi talking to RunBlogRun.
More: The wait for Ezekiel Kemboi to move from the steeplechase to the marathon is almost over, a view from Kenya…
*Ezekiel Kemboi Prepping For His Marathon Debut In Hamburg On April 28 Kemboi is being coached by former steeplechase world champ Moses Kiptanui and says, “I have been training hard on the roads. I started training last year, my body is fit for the marathons and my timing is equally good.”
#5 Is running a gift or a chore?
“Many people see exercise as a chore or something they ‘have’ to do in order to live a ‘healthy’ life. I view my daily run as an absolute gift. The words ‘gift’ and ‘gratitude’ appear regularly in my Strava captions, along with things like ‘sunrise’, ‘spice girls’ and ‘death by Munich lap’…
“There is absolutely no substitute for the feeling after getting the best out of yourself in a race. You ride on it for days. And while some people do struggle to understand why pushing yourself to exhaustion is fun (sometimes I ask myself this too), I have yet to meet someone who regretted a run, only the one they did not do.
“I live for Sunday mornings. The long run is my favorite because of the team aspect. There is a buzz when the texts go around the various WhatsApp chats on Saturday, figuring out who isn’t racing or gone for the weekend.”
–Bláithín Sheil, blogging on Fastrunning.com about how she loves running.
#6 Did he jinx his own company?
“It’s not hard to put out a live sporting event anymore. Hundreds of companies are capable of producing and distributing live sports.”
–Mike Levy, FloSports vice president for global rights acquisition, speaking to the Austin American-Statesman after FloSports (the parent company of FloTrack) got the broadcast rights to some DC United MLS games.
FloSports proceeded to butcher much of its first broadcast, angering many die-hard soccer fans, one of whom wrote on reddit, “Flo’s business model is overcharging for marquee events that otherwise wouldn’t have a broadcast partner, and catering to niche markets. Of course, they’re able to get away with providing subpar service to these markets because those fallen trees will not make much noise. This time, they may have gone too far; they’re messing with fans of the highest level of soccer in the United States, and those shortcomings will be under a bigger spotlight.”
Headline of the Week
The Kenyan press is getting ready for next week’s World XC champs:
- Sports Examiner: IAAF’s new ranking system is biased against US, Jamaican, Ethiopians and Kenyans – “Can we be surprised that the group who developed this process is from Europe, and not from the U.S. or Africa?” “It’s insulting to value the NCAA Championships sprints and hurdles events – some of the best in the world each year – the same as second and third-tier events like the Mediterranean Games or Pan-Arab Games. Are you kidding?”
- “USATF Has Shot Itself In The Dick Yet Again” Young writes, “No one in the world is better at creating needless controversy and riling up its own athletes and fans than USA Track & Field. Their latest hit: nuking by far its single greatest asset, the Olympic Trials.”
- Toni Reavis thinks distance running should leave the IAAF
- GB’s Former Olympic 1,500/800 Champ Kelly Holmes Speaks Openly About Her Struggles With Depression It wasn’t the point of the article, but we were happy to see Holmes defend women’s sport and tennis legend Martina Navratilova: “We’re just standing up for girls and women who physically have less bone density, muscular structure and lung capacity, and we haven’t got the testosterone.”
- “The Indelible Duel – An Oral History Of Franklyn Sanchez Vs. Andy Powell In The 1999 Massachusetts All-State Indoor 2-Mile” Powell, Sanchez, their coaches and others look back at this thrilling race where Sanchez got a shock underdog victory over Powell with an 8:49.60 to 8:50.29.
To see our favorite reads from other weeks, go here.
Quotes Of The Day And Last Week’s Home Pages
To see the quotes of the day from last week or last week’s home page or any home page, go to our archive page.