Brian Gates2 wrote:
"Glute activation" is an example of the fallacy of rationalism, i.e. a concept dreamed up is one's head that is not anchored to reality. Either there is no such thing, or the term is redundant since it it impossible to ambulate without activating the glutes. The idea that you can improve performance by focusing on the glutes to make them more "active" is bullsh!t. You might well improve performance by making them stronger or better conditioned, but that can be achieved by simple weight training and running, and the glutes neither need nor deserve any more attention than any other propulsive muscle. Any time you hear a coach, trainer, or internet "expert" mention "glute activation," realize you're dealing with an idiot .
"Experts" aren't suggesting that the glutes are not firing and experts aren't necessarily suggesting that you will run faster if you do exercises targeting the glutes. Experts do suggest that injuries, bad posture, inactivity, overly tight muscles, poor mechanics and muscle imbalances can lead to altered movement patterns. Some people do require activation exercises- not most. Simple muscle testing can confirm this. "Simple weight traing" isn't always correct weight training.
What's the function of the glute maximus?
What are its concentric actions, eccentric actions and isometric actions? A previous poster wrote how riding a bicycle is enough to strengthen it. Understanding that its primary function concentricly is hip extension would suggest otherwise. There's a reason some people need "remedial" work for certain muscles. If we all walked up stairs more, used hills, sat less, put deadlifts and lunges in our programs we wouldn't need to activate them.
Admittedly if I'm sitting for too long I'll do some glute bridges and band walks for a couple of minutes especially before I workout.