nothing out of the ordinary wrote:
NativeSon wrote:
This sums it all.
.....and he was about 23.
This was the 2009 WC final in Berlin. Mo was in position with 1 lap and had zero closing speed. He was 26 and should have been near his prime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4YXfwEa4hMThis is 2 years later, and 6 months after joining Salazar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6s9BmocEko
Really interesting. I'd never watched those two back-to-back. It's amazing how much Farah's form improved in those two years as he moved from "near his prime" to actually in his prime. Also interesting that he ran 13:19 to finish 7th in 2009 but 13:23 to win 2011.
Before we look to attribute Farah's success to doping, for which there isn't even circumstantial evidence - seriously, none at all, nothing of what I have seen would stand up in court even on the balance of probabilities. For me, Farah's success is down to two things:
1. He learned to manage races better.
2. He got very lucky. The very best distance runners went to the roads. Look at that 2009 field - peak Bekele, Lagat, and track Kipchoge. In 2011 he's facing an aging Lagat and a Kipchoge who is transitioning to the marathon.
As for Coburn's comments, she should be airing her views and I'm really happy to see athletes speaking out. I'd like to see more of them speaking out about American athletes too, instead of wrapping themselves in the flag and choosing to believe the best. I listened to the Jared Ward interview on the Clean Sport podcast where he said he chose to give Galen Rupp the benefit of the doubt and believe he is clean until proven otherwise. Kara Goucher said that that was a great outlook but is then all over social media piling into Mo Farah. I'm not saying this is a race issue, but it's definitely one rule for Americans and another for athletes from other countries.