SDSU Aztec wrote:
Lois2 wrote:
Okay so it’s a free for all until...when? When a biological male comes 19th? When they come 3rd and make the team? It’s all good until some other arbitrary limit is hit, then what? We suddenly DQ them? That’s not going to happen.
Or are you say you personally support this until someone does win?
What sort of win though? Is a local 5k a sacrifice? A marathon major? Is it okay until it’s Olympic team? What if they come 20th at the Olympics?
I just can’t see the natural end of the “but she didn’t win” argument
Other than the local 5K, there is zero indication any of your predictions will come true. You're getting worked up over runners that don't exist.
You didn’t answer - it’s hypothetical, not predictions. It may never happen, but hypothetically if bio men did win the top three spots, would that be okay with you?
I feel like either one thinks they can compete totally, or shouldn’t at all. Because either it relates to your biology, chromosomes, hormones and history, or it doesn’t. Like I said the “it’s okay if she doesn’t” win argument is illogical. It’s basically saying there is a difference that isn’t fair but you’ll turn a blind eye for now. Is that the case?