In light of the mounting evidence, Trump's impeachment is a foregone conclusion.

Greg wrote:

Impeachment is inevitable.

You can't have someone degrade women, have rape accusations, collude with the Russians, disrespect the military, disrespect the democratic candidate, disrespect the media and befriend dictators lead your country.

But he already is...so what does that say about the electorate?

Farmer in Chehalis, Washington wrote:

TTH wrote:

With the power of the DOJ, FBI, CIA and a friendly AG, why would the POTUS need to bribe another country to "investigate" Biden and his son?

You can't see the forest through the trees.

Why shouldn't Ukraine investigate it? It's happening in their country.

The Ukrainians might investigate breaches of their own laws or threats to their own security. But that is their sovereign right and is not decided at the behest of the leader of a foreign power - the US. Yet Ukrainian laws and security weren't at issue. Ukrainians aren't obliged to investigate possible breaches of US law, which does not extend to sovereign nations, and there is nothing about the allegations concerning the Bidens that has been shown to have any substance; it has all existed in Trump and Giuliani's heads - where reason has long departed. Trump was exerting pressure on a foreign power - that was tantamount to extortion - to help him win the next presidential election and thereby violating his constitutional obligation to uphold the integrity of the American electoral process.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Well, there this though wrote:

"Dig up dirt" implies asking to find something new. That'sot what Trump did. Biden was already under investigation for hooking his son up years ago. Biden himself has bragged about using extortion to get the investigation stopped. That's on tape. In his own words. Trump didn't want any new dirt dug up...he wanted the illegal activity that Biden weaseled his way out of to be looked into.

And since when does being a presidential candidate exempt you from being held accountable for crimes you committed in the past?

Wrong. If there was damaging information available on Biden then Trump wouldn't be seeking the Ukrainian president to investigate him. It wouldn't have been necessary because it would have already been public knowledge. None of the claims about Biden or his son have been substantiated. Trump was fishing.

And there it is. The proof that Armpilovs if a Pelosi/MSNBC hack. The phrase "None of the claims about Biden or his son have been substantiated." is a Dem talking point. 100% propaganda. Just because you and Nancy say it doesn't mean it's true. Here are the facts:

1. Biden's son has no credentials qualifying him to serve on any international billion dollar companies. Zero experience, zero knowledge of the industry at hand, nothing.

2. He suddenly gets apointed to all these high paying boards making millions.

3. The Ukranian gov started to investigate this corrupt hook up, but then suddenly stopped.

4. Joe has stated in public and on video that he witheld funds to Ukrain until the corruption investigation in to him and his son was dropped.

All of these things are verifyable fact.

Armpitlovs, please go away. You look like an idiot.

Hey farmer guy, stop with your Fox News talking points. It is nice that you are concerned about Biden's son. If F.B.I. find out Biden's son violated U.S. laws, it will result in a criminal charge. If not, Fox News is just having dumb hicks like you chasing ghosts.

None of us have seen the case the U.S. house will bring to U.S. Senator for impeachment. The phone call in Ukraine is not the entire case. Don McGahn still has to be interviewed. Hope Hicks still has to be interviewed. While you and your Fox News watching friends think the entire case is a phone call to Ukraine, you will see:

1) Campaign violations using campaign funds to pay off women.

2) Robert Mueller, a country club Republican decided not to pull tax records &/or bank records for T R U M P or T R U M P corp. How can one investigate a conspiracy without tax records and bank records? T R U M P will go down for conspiring with Russians once bank records and tax records are shown.

3) Emolument violations. There are numerous examples of T R U M P using his office as president for personal enrichment.

If you have some info which will aid F.B.I. in the arrest of one or more Biden, give F.B.I. said information. I doubt you have any information. If one or more Biden were to be arrested, it changes nothing for T R U M P and impeachment.

They have been saying they were going to impeach him every since they won the House. They have a crap bag of candidates for 2020, so they saw a small chance and latched on to it. This is probably their best chance of getting rid of him.

Well, there this though wrote:

1. Biden's son has no credentials qualifying him to serve on any international billion dollar companies. Zero experience, zero knowledge of the industry at hand, nothing.

LOL! I can think of another individual who has no credentials qualifying them to be in quite a position of power. Zero experience, zero knowledge of anything at hand, nothing. Said person has been known as a corrupt shyster for most of their existence. I'll give you 1 guess who I am talking about.

LOL, man the irony of some of you idiots is really great. I love coming here. So amusing.

laugh out loud wrote:

Well, there this though wrote:

1. Biden's son has no credentials qualifying him to serve on any international billion dollar companies. Zero experience, zero knowledge of the industry at hand, nothing.

LOL! I can think of another individual who has no credentials qualifying them to be in quite a position of power. Zero experience, zero knowledge of anything at hand, nothing. Said person has been known as a corrupt shyster for most of their existence. I'll give you 1 guess who I am talking about.

LOL, man the irony of some of you idiots is really great. I love coming here. So amusing.

You may be right, but he was elected by the people. Biden was simply hooked up. Bigly difference. Sorry you are too stupid to see that.

Thats fine but wrote:

laugh out loud wrote:

LOL! I can think of another individual who has no credentials qualifying them to be in quite a position of power. Zero experience, zero knowledge of anything at hand, nothing. Said person has been known as a corrupt shyster for most of their existence. I'll give you 1 guess who I am talking about.

LOL, man the irony of some of you idiots is really great. I love coming here. So amusing.

You may be right, but he was elected by the people. Biden was simply hooked up. Bigly difference. Sorry you are too stupid to see that.

So what was so special about this particular case of nepotism in big business, compared to all the other countless cases of nepotism in big business?

It makes a big enough difference to you that you feel it is a valid defense of the presidents conduct that America should feel that he was acting in our best interest because Biden's son got a job he's not qualified for?

And you are calling me too stupid? LOL!

Right now you have a few people who were either listening to the call or heard about the call second or third hand who say they think it was improper and they think there was pressure put on Ukraine to do the investigating or there would be no aid. Both principals on the call disagree. Our POTUS says his request was to look into corruption in general, with the Biden case being an example. The D's say no, it was to get dirt on a political rival. I doubt either side can prove their case. The D's will vote to impeach, the R's will not, and no way he is removed by the Senate.

laugh out loud wrote:

It makes a big enough difference to you that you feel it is a valid defense of the presidents conduct that America should feel that he was acting in our best interest because Biden's son got a job he's not qualified for?

And you are calling me too stupid? LOL!

It's about Joe, dummy. Not his son. You know, the one who abused his power as VP? Geeze.

Your post was about Joe? LOL! I am the dummy? You forget what you typed? LOL!

NotPC wrote:

They have been saying they were going to impeach him every since they won the House. They have a crap bag of candidates for 2020, so they saw a small chance and latched on to it. This is probably their best chance of getting rid of him.

First, who are "They"? There were three or four U.S. Congresswomen in 2018 saying impeachment. There are 435 U.S. Congresspersons. Are you implying the process has taken a long time? I am sure you would agree T R U M P has vigorously blocked efforts to investigate him. If T R U M P had turned over his personal and corporate bank records and tax records a long time ago, he would have been impeached a long time ago. If T R U M P had not taken efforts to block testimony from Hope Hicks, Don McGahn and others, T R U M P would have been impeached a long time ago. It will happen. There will be Articles of Impeachment other than one phone call to a leader in Ukraine. No need to refine your debating skills defending T R U M P for the one phone call.

They=Democrats

Seemed pretty clear, are you thick headed, slow?

My post? What the heck are you talking about? You got issues, bro.

Check your facts

Nope, Not it wrote:

My post? What the heck are you talking about? You got issues, bro.

LOL! Dude you replied to a post about Joe and brought up his son. I replied to you. Try to keep up. LOL!

Farmer in Chehalis, Washington wrote:

TTH wrote:

With the power of the DOJ, FBI, CIA and a friendly AG, why would the POTUS need to bribe another country to "investigate" Biden and his son?

You can't see the forest through the trees.

Why shouldn't Ukraine investigate it? It's happening in their country.

With the power of the DOJ, FBI, CIA and a friendly AG, why would the POTUS need to bribe another country to "investigate" Biden and his son?