the OP again wrote:
She Easy wrote:
She doesn’t know who the father is.
they got a test afterwards to prove it was the boyfriends (she was cheating on him). but why does she not get child support? there has got to be more to it
and no i am not dating her anymore, i had enough of the bs
She has to take some simple steps to apply for and get child support.
Stop being a moron.
Invalid Username wrote:
Time with children, however, doesn't play into the legal requirements, based on my experience. My ex-wife and I agreed to just 15% of my income (versus 25%) because our son was with me three and a half days, and same with her. The judge very reluctantly accepted our agreement, saying proportion of time with each parent had no bearing on the child support amount.
Child support is a matter of state law. Some state guidelines incorporate time spent with the child, other states do not.
Invalid Username wrote:
. Many of these are nicely outfitted work trucks used by contractors. Seems counter productive to take away a key tool for a man's livelihood but it's as much about punishment as trying to get money to the mothers.
If you're self-employed making enough to own a nice rig free and clear, or mostly paid off, you're making enough to pay some child support, eh?
Obvi wrote:
Invalid Username wrote:
Overheard a guy bragging he had 10 kids with eight baby-mamas. Wondering how that works because in New York State child support per child is figured at 25% of gross income minus social security tax. And child support laws are taken very seriously here. Every three months there is a local auto auction of vehicles seized for failure to pay child support. Many of these are nicely outfitted work trucks used by contractors. Seems counter productive to take away a key tool for a man's livelihood but it's as much about punishment as trying to get money to the mothers. Anyway that makes me wonder how the guy with 10 kids can get by.
You are just plain WRONG on that. Not sure if you are simply lying or just ignorant (and lying about "knowing" how it works in NY state).
Yes, I was mistaken. I should have double-checked before posting! The 25% figure I had in mind (from long ago) was for TWO children. The correct figure for ONE child is 17% of gross income (minus Medicare and FICA taxes). 25% for two, 29% for three, 31% for four, and 35+% for five or more. Also required is paying for medical insurance plus any out-of-pocket medical expenses. Also, add on a portion of child-care costs. It can total a lot more than 17% of income, even with just one child.
If a man has children with multiple women, wouldn't EACH be entitled to 17% of his income, plus medical coverage?
aren't you the guy who posts racists sht all the time?
Invalid Username wrote:
Obvi wrote:
You are just plain WRONG on that. Not sure if you are simply lying or just ignorant (and lying about "knowing" how it works in NY state).
Yes, I was mistaken. I should have double-checked before posting! The 25% figure I had in mind (from long ago) was for TWO children. The correct figure for ONE child is 17% of gross income (minus Medicare and FICA taxes). 25% for two, 29% for three, 31% for four, and 35+% for five or more. Also required is paying for medical insurance plus any out-of-pocket medical expenses. Also, add on a portion of child-care costs. It can total a lot more than 17% of income, even with just one child.
If a man has children with multiple women, wouldn't EACH be entitled to 17% of his income, plus medical coverage?
No. The number of children is the determinant - not the number of women.