How about forgetting about this performance then? You l let's go Sinead Diver's after just a few token shots
How about devoting a little time to self improvement?
How about forgetting about this performance then? You l let's go Sinead Diver's after just a few token shots
How about devoting a little time to self improvement?
Armstronglivs wrote:
David S. Pumpkins wrote:
If you didn't know this, then the fact that you are throwing around these claims without knowing anything about her is more obvious than ever.
Like you throwing around your claim that aging is 0.2% decline each year with no source for that?
Yeah that wasn't me. I'm the one that said there is no unassailable number. Keep up buddy.
Pumpkins, out.
I would say wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You do realise that the research you deride offers the more generous prediction of aging; that most other commentaries seem to incline to age degradation greater than that? Do you have a figure that you regard as acceptable or are you simply subscribing to the popular mantra here that "everyone is different" and so no standard applies?
.2% if the athlete keeps doing all the right things in training
You need to do a study on only athletes who try, not just folks of a certain age just out there competing.
Masters records can surely be broken, no?
What was that you were saying about 0.2% again?
Now you're saying it wasn't you. A short memory can be a very convenient thing.
Armstronglivs wrote:
I would say wrote:
.2% if the athlete keeps doing all the right things in training
You need to do a study on only athletes who try, not just folks of a certain age just out there competing.
Masters records can surely be broken, no?
What was that you were saying about 0.2% again?
Now you're saying it wasn't you. A short memory can be a very convenient thing.
Read it again buddy. I took out some of the middle quotes because that reading thing can get mighty difficult for some folks.
Now read my username again. Now read the username of the person that said 0.2% again. Go back a few pages and read the original again if you like and think I altered something above.
Best of luck to you. It's tough getting through life when you can't connect dots as simple as these.
Armstronglivs wrote:
I would say wrote:
.2% if the athlete keeps doing all the right things in training
You need to do a study on only athletes who try, not just folks of a certain age just out there competing.
Masters records can surely be broken, no?
What was that you were saying about 0.2% again?
Now you're saying it wasn't you. A short memory can be a very convenient thing.
That was me, not David.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Russian runners who were doping used combinations of steroids, testosterone and amphetamines. These all significantly boosted endurance. Of course, as we have seen with the unfortunately numerous busts in Kenya, EPO has figured quite a lot in marathon runners testing positive. Some of their top runners have been using it, as you will know. However, the range of choice of ped's today is considerable; according to a French-made documentary series that was screened recently on Aljazeera, there are "hundreds of undetectable products now available on the doping black market", which it also said amounted to "billions of Euros" annually.
Every sport is affected by it; there is no reason why an endurance sport like the marathon would be exempt - and we see that it isn't. And every level of athlete could gain advantage from using, not just elites. There has been a huge upsurge in prescriptions for testosterone amongst baby boomers in the US; they aren't taking it as a placebo.
Since you brought up the subject of pharmaceuticals, here's an interesting study with aging athletes:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3874227/David S. Pumpkins wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
What was that you were saying about 0.2% again?
Now you're saying it wasn't you. A short memory can be a very convenient thing.
Read it again buddy. I took out some of the middle quotes because that reading thing can get mighty difficult for some folks.
Now read my username again. Now read the username of the person that said 0.2% again. Go back a few pages and read the original again if you like and think I altered something above.
Best of luck to you. It's tough getting through life when you can't connect dots as simple as these.
I guess you weren't that interesting for me to read it that closely. It's tough sometimes when you don't stand out from the crowd.
Armstronglivs wrote:
David S. Pumpkins wrote:
Read it again buddy. I took out some of the middle quotes because that reading thing can get mighty difficult for some folks.
Now read my username again. Now read the username of the person that said 0.2% again. Go back a few pages and read the original again if you like and think I altered something above.
Best of luck to you. It's tough getting through life when you can't connect dots as simple as these.
I guess you weren't that interesting for me to read it that closely. It's tough sometimes when you don't stand out from the crowd.
65 going on 10. Now you're just being a nob.
You don't really read anything closely wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I guess you weren't that interesting for me to read it that closely. It's tough sometimes when you don't stand out from the crowd.
65 going on 10. Now you're just being a nob.
The nicest thing you've said all day.
You don't really read anything closely wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
I guess you weren't that interesting for me to read it that closely. It's tough sometimes when you don't stand out from the crowd.
65 going on 10. Now you're just being a nob.
You guys sound like a bunch of grumpy old men! Lol.
https://youtu.be/xmhFRvrSqJoArmstronglivs wrote:
You don't really read anything closely wrote:
65 going on 10. Now you're just being a nob.
The nicest thing you've said all day.
I guess this is true, but only because it's the only thing "You don't really read anything closely" has written all day.
(I think you think I wrote something I didn't again. I would not call you a nob. We're buddies.)
David S. Pumpkins wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
The nicest thing you've said all day.
I guess this is true, but only because it's the only thing "You don't really read anything closely" has written all day.
(I think you think I wrote something I didn't again. I would not call you a nob. We're buddies.)
Aw, shucks.
Impressed wrote:
Can we talk about her race today?! Age 41 with a PR race of 2:29:06 and nurse and mom. Humble and grinding away.
Just ran ten miles at age 45 in 55.13. Nowhere near the great Aussie 45yo Sinead Diver. Not in the same ballpark.
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06