bewildered observer wrote:
I wrote this:
I agree that time is not the only metric that should be considered when it comes to determining who is "better" between two runners.
You responded with this:
You really don't seem to get it. PB's don't decide who is the better runner.
We are saying the same thing and yet you continue to argue. Why?
"Regardless, why not just look at their PBs and say which of them you think is better? It doesn't paint the whole picture by any means but it's what is being asked.".
It isn't what is being asked. The question posed is simply, of Mo and Kejelcha, who is the better runner. I don't accept your or anyone else's assertion that PB's settle that question. So we aren't saying the same thing at all.
You acknowledge that PB's aren't the "full metric" for deciding who is better - and yet you continue to require answer to the question of superiority based solely on their PB's. You are thus seeking to maintain two contradictory positions - which you can't do. You may hold to one or the other, but not both.
Regardless of what you think the OP or anyone else says, PB's do not establish who is the "better" runner, only that one runner may have faster PB's. So when you say that PB's are not the full measure, and then insist that we should accept the assertion they are - if only for the sake of argument - well, that is perverse. And wrong.
In my view, a much wider basis of comparison is needed than simply relying on PB's, including major race victories. Until Kejelcha wins multiple titles as Farah has he is still behind in the race.