Is anybody else sickened by the witch hunt against Michael Jackson?

Q. "Is anybody else sickened by the witch hunt against Michael Jackson?"

A. No, but you seem to be the only sicko and pederast apologist who is.

Putting dead people on trail aint right wrote:

It's been happening in the UK for several years

Really? Please give several, not the one well known, examples.

Q and A wrote:

Q. "Is anybody else sickened by the witch hunt against Michael Jackson?"

A. No, but you seem to be the only sicko and pederast apologist who is.

How do you know nobody else is sickened? You're the first person to have replied.

Also, how do you know that nobody else is sickened if people like you (probably secret pederasts) is going to accuse anybody who doesn't share in the public sickening of being 'pederast apologists'?

I read that in the middle-ages, anyone who questioned the guilt of witches was also publicly burned as witches. Do you think that proves the witches must have been guilty? Also it's well documented that the men who were the worst 'witch finder generals' were perverts who loved to sexually torture and rape women. Just as it's been shown time and time again that those who are most vocal about homosexuals were themselves closet homosexuals and generally perverts.

BTW, I'm not defending pederastry in any way, as I made clear in my post. I'm defending the right to presumed innocence of those who aren't here to defend themselves (and when they were here, were cleared in court).

Banana Beard wrote:

Putting dead people on trail aint right wrote:

It's been happening in the UK for several years

Really? Please give several, not the one well known, examples.

There's been countless.

John Peel.

Cyril Smith

David Bowie (although he seems largely to be still giving a pass for having sex with a 13 year old. And strangely, unlike the others, it's not disputed that he had sex with minors. Similar with Elvis Presely).

Ted Heath

Leon Britten (and other's who were still alive at the start of their witchhunts but elderly and suffering alzheimers and soon died).

There's just the names I can pull of the top of my head before I've woken up.

One of the 'victims' who made serial accusations against Leon Britten and other dead British politicians was revealed to be a known paedophile and sex offender and fantasist, yet the police found him 'credible' and put the families of the 'suspects' through utter hell. The false accuser has now been charged for wasting police time or some such. According to you and the other crazy, anyone who questions an accuser is a nonce apologist and should be burnt at the stake as well.

Wait........there's still people who think Michael Jackson DIDN'T rape kids?!?

People DID notice and it was kind of a big deal.

People got paid off and no one went to jail.

and now you are suddenly upset about it NOW?

With the possible (although I think this too, although not by me, may have been well known) exception of John Peel these are all terrible examples as they were all well known cases whilst they were alive without any huge jump in vilification after they'd died. Much like this Michael Jackson case. It's hardly like anyone is utterly shocked to be hearing this now.

I do find the whole process of society being able to try and sentence a dead person through the media a fascinating thing though. The Saville case is an amazing case in point. Don't get me wrong, it seems clear he was guilty as hell, and an absolute beast but because he's dead no actual trial required. The "accusers'" word automatically becomes fact, no actual evidence requiring presentation. You've also got a strange thing re weight of accusations. What is the finite number of people required to make an accusation to turn that into fact without any process?

Just saw a preview for a new movie/documentary with MULTIPLE victims (now adults) giving vivid details of how Jackson groomed and seduced the boys AND fooled the families into thinking it was safe to trust him with their children. Or "chillin" as Michael used to call them.

Many MULTI million dollar payouts, settlements, etc. All documented......probably lots more that were not, too. Guy (or whatever he was) was a sick MF who just happened to be a great entertainer.

By the way........not one GIRL ever accused jackoff Jacko of touching them. Know why? His sleepovers didn't include girls. Guess he thought girls were icky.

History does this all the time. How is the MJ documentary any different? Because it’s more contemporary?

Q and A wrote:

A. No, but you seem to be the only sicko and pederast apologist who is.

This still seems to be the case.

It's a shame how committed normalcy our society really is. Look at this one?

https://clashdaily.com/2019/01/documentary-claims-michael-jackson-staged-mock-weddings-for-boys-he-was-raping/

wait.......Wut???? wrote:Wait........there's still people who think Michael Jackson DIDN'T rape kids?!?

People DID notice and it was kind of a big deal.

People got paid off and no one went to jail.

This agrees with my own memories of the 80s and 90s. I don't know anybody who didn't think MJ was diddling kids he invited over to his fantasy play house.

He didn't do it. If you look up the court case it's clear it was all done for money. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpzAtdQN56c&t=1444s

Just because a recent film was made doesn't mean the sexual allegations are NEW. Child abuse allegations against Jackson were first raised in the early '90s. His child molestation trial was in 2005. Jackson died in 2009. The media have been reporting on Jackson's alleged child molestation for decades now. Americans know this. You are just not up on things in the States.

I really don't care about Michael Jackson one way or the other. I find it amusing that some do.

A good example of how the rich and powerful get off scot-free in the CA paedo world.

No, I'm not particularly sickened by it.

Likewise, he's had some very reprehensible things in his music reflecting bigotry and prejudice, and what goes around, comes around. He's got it coming.

... he was raping little kids ... it's a grave failing of the police, media, everybody at the time not to notice it and stop it.

+1

Sadly, the well-heeled CA paedo industry made sure this never came to fruition.

I agree, we all do indeed shoulder some of the blame in the end.