Indoor? wrote:
I wasn’t a fan of this quote:
"There is a difference between what is right and what is fair, and people have to decide which side of the fence they want to be on," says Robin McHaelen, executive director of True Colors, a Hartford-based nonprofit that provides services to LGBTQ youth.
I don’t think there is a difference. And as many have pointed out she could compete against males, people will still make fun of her but no one will be that mad because she will not be good.
I also found it interesting the mom wouldn’t say whether she was undergoing HRT. Didn’t want to fuel the haters with proof that she has an advantage.
Whoa! I missed the McHaelen quote. Yes, there's the problem right there: sport is NOTHING if it's not fair. The concept of fair play is intrinsic to every sort of sport you can name.
It wasn't right that women weren't allowed to run the Olympic marathon until 1984. But once that wrong was righted, it wouldn't have been fair had they been forced to compete in the men's division. Generally we can align "rightness," in social justice terms, with fairness. It wasn't right that black baseball players were relegated to their own league until Jackie Robinson broken the color barrier. But even before Robinson, black and white teams put on exhibition matches, and they played each other by the rules: they played fair, even if the segregation of the game in larger terms wasn't right.
The problem with trans athletes like Yearwood competing in the women's division is that it isn't fair. It's certainly right that Yearwood gets to compete at all, but she's been sorted into the wrong group, and that creates a situation that isn't fair.
McHaelen's logic is SJW logic. I don't blame her for it. But it isn't sporting logic. At all.