Alison Stokke update

She's a nice kid who acts like the typical Berkeley grad if you have ever have had the chance to talk to her.

Sure. One guy brings up politics (see his post).

Someone responds.

Posters like you respond about their posts both not being relevant to the OP's original topic (he's posted twice with different handles since his first).

You then decide that the 2 posters don't even have a coherent discussion.

Someone else chimes in and agrees with you (it was you under a different handle looking for ghost support).

You then bring up the original topic in a desperate attempt to sound smart.

Sure, you're so different and post such coherent responses that we are all in awe.

Next, you post under a different handle, again trying to gain ghost support.

Then you read this sentence and get mad, I'll show them and I'll post under Sdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdf to prove I can stand on my own.

Yet, here you are, posting on a thread about a female who could give 2 sh*ts about you and the laminated poster of her on your basement bedroom wall.

Feel better now?

Ha, ha, ha!! Well put & this is LetsRun baby!! Sdf? does this all the time!! Sdf=small d*ck forever, just guessing:)

Weird? You are one strange guy as I've been around long enough to have seen your weird posts. You were confused? Wow, I'm not really surprised about that as it doesn't take much to confuse you.

So Cal people get all the attention. I wish I was from The OC too. Not me.

provlw wrote:

Deer Runner wrote:

You realize that calling someone a believer in science is not an insult, right?

I was thinking the same thing. Science believing fool? Isn't that an oxymoron?

It certainly is

Yes sir! wrote:

provlw wrote:

I was thinking the same thing. Science believing fool? Isn't that an oxymoron?

It certainly is

Reality Bites is one of those religious nuts that try to claim that science is also a religion, completely ignoring the fact that science is based on the best facts available, and if new facts are discovered, science will change. Unlike faith based religion, which refuses to change in the face of new facts. He'll also claim something scientific is "just a theory", proving he doesn't understand the difference between a hypothesis and a theory.

Gravy wrote:

DietBacon wrote:

For a website criticizing people for giving her attention for her looks and not sporting achievements, they sure used a lot of pictures of her in the article.

http://d29l8fj0bhi1tg.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/19080737/stokke6.jpg

i think she should do a sex tape and make big time money, then a reality tv show.

moist wrote:

Gravy wrote:

http://d29l8fj0bhi1tg.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/19080737/stokke6.jpg

Lol and people here think Emma Coburn is hot smh

+1. It definitely moved.

woodman part deuce wrote:

Lulz wrote:

Always amazes me that these science believing fools are the ones that tell us XX & XY don't determine sex.

They support science when it is convenient, and ignore it when it offends them.

Meanwhile, Most Right wingers just ignore science.

This country is so dumb right now.

Yeah sure Bozo. Those lefties, like you, use science so "conveniently" it's hilarious. When we get a nasty winter, we are suppose to. When it's warmer than usual, which has happened for centuries, it's global warming....oh sorry, climate change (because the lefties knew that won't apply every year>>>like YOU).

So yes, it always amazes me how you Demos choose when to use science to fit your criteria...just amazing!!!!!

p.s. Don't believe your parents Lulz, you're simply not that bright.

...I am so confused by what this guy just said. The grammar is impossibly jumbled.

I thought it was pretty clear that I am not a democrat. Perhaps work on your reading comprehension?

In any case, I have refused to discuss politics with my parents for some years now. And I don't live in my parent's home.

Hayduke wrote:

Doctors call it the "hey there delilah syndrome" while in the same breath bemoaning their celebrity being based on superficial things, they then struggle to prove that the attention they receive is based on talents or skill. They then fall back on what made them popular in the first place......being young and attractive.... however now that they are in their late 20's and beyond, now they are just attractive. kinds of kills the mode for those who really just liked young and attractive.

Doctors have actually quantified this as a syndrome? I think you made that up.

Luv2Run wrote:

http://www.worldation.com/stories/allison-stokke-story/29/

Stooke was an internet sensation back when the internet started becoming popular, it's first genre being L.A. entertainment and celebrities. Now it's ,M(AG,,A, 2nd Amendment, American First, and White Peoples Rights.

Sdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdf wrote:

In 2012 and 2016 she was "training for the olympics" despite being ranked outside the top 20........ Americans....

How is that unreasonable? You're saying that only the top 20 ranked should even bother trying to get in the Olympic trials, which I think accept at least a dozen athletes in every event?

So you're saying that it makes total sense to you that a thread about a hot pole vault girl would suddenly morph into a discussion of politics by a far right conspiracy theorist and a far left conspiracy theorist? Because I am truly confused how any of it was relevant to the topic.

She has Rickie Fowler. Once she marries that guy she won't need money...

Guarantee that 90% of the guys that took a pot shot at Allison Stokke in this thread wish they were Rickie Fowler and don't have the humility to admit it.

What the hell is going on in here? Leave you guys unsupervised for 10 minutes and you create a thread containing meaningless drivel.

The question is, will Rickie Fowler's golf game improve or faulter by a Stokke?

MUSGA

T. Woods wrote:

She has Rickie Fowler. Once she marries that guy she won't need money...

Why would a rich guy like RW marry anyone when he can play around for the rest of his life with his Golf earnings.