i definitely reckon the 1 day lack of rest cost him 1/2s compared to if 1 further day's rest
if he'd run final on sunday, it's quite possible he couda gone 43-high
i definitely reckon the 1 day lack of rest cost him 1/2s compared to if 1 further day's rest
if he'd run final on sunday, it's quite possible he couda gone 43-high
Is that an NCAA freshman record?
The 100/200 were also fast. Christian Coleman and Netheneel Blake(?) of LSU ran 9.97/9.99 in the 100 and Coleman broke 20 narrowly in the 200m.
Kerley may regret not running to the line in the prelim but I am sure that he thinks that he can take down the NCAA record and 44 flat later in the season.
Excellent practice to have heats and finals at conference, regionals, NCAA champs, and USA trials before World's. There were guys at the Olympics that ran very, very fast in the prelims only to miss out later. 44.09 slowing and 44.30 make a very, very high quality double. We should not miss out on the fact that two freshmen from Auburn ran 44.52 and 44.81, times that can contend for a spot on the U.S. team fairly often.
And on a wet track too.
Rthdx wrote:
And on a wet track too.
https://youtu.be/sLt8Ns7uRfo
definitely worth coupla tenths quicker on dry track & it looked colder
he ran lot slower 200 obviously from fatigue/weather
even then, on dry, same good-temperature as yesterday, i'd reckon that was
~ 43.9 / 44.0
enormous talent !!!
in a zurich, later in year, if not burned out, he can go
~ 43-low
zxvxzcv wrote:
I watched the finish four more times. That slowdown was absolutely worth .3 to .4 seconds.
No, it wasn't. Remember 0.3 seconds at that speed is about 2.5 metres. There's no way he 'lost' 2.5m in the last 10m (which is about when he started slowing down.) I'd say it was worth closer to 0.1 seconds or about 0.8m.
qwerwe wrote:The 100/200 were also fast. Christian Coleman and Netheneel Blake(?) of LSU ran 9.97/9.99 in the 100 and Coleman broke 20 narrowly in the 200m
he becomes only 3rd or 4th ever guy to
< 10 / < 20
on same day !
Kerley may regret not running to the line in the prelim but I am sure that he thinks that he can take down the NCAA record and 44 flat later in the season
eh ?
that's 100% certain if stays healthy & low-wind, dry track
Excellent practice to have heats and finals at conference, regionals, NCAA champs, and USA trials before World's
is this a joke ???
it wrecks these guys !!!
it matters for few off them, but when Fred turns up in WC final in august, he will be really f****cked off that he had to carry a 44.09 prelim from May !!!
that wrecking run coud cost him 0.05 - 0.1s for whole year until tokyo !
muscle hammering/memory
every great guy has limited number of fast runs in his legs & the prelim of easy-44.09 coud cost him lot by tokyo
There were guys at the Olympics that ran very, very fast in the prelims only to miss out later
wrong meet
it was peking-'15
they obviously not bright & had personal agendas such as no arab/carib < 44 & wanted to show off everything immediately
i thought they may hold on in rounds to respectable < 44, but. it finished them
ncaa needs no rounds, not in semi-conference
heats only for ncaa finals
this meet maya killed off Fred & Coleman for weeks !!!
44.09 slowing and 44.30 make a very, very high quality double
wet track & looked colder
best 2-day 400 ever
We should not miss out on the fact that two freshmen from Auburn ran 44.52 and 44.81, times that can contend for a spot on the U.S. team fairly often
having ncaa kids for spots is hardly new
it was absurd prelims before !!!
this shouda been a meet based on fastest times in 3 or 4 separate finals
this way, Fred & Coleman couda given their best with no fatigue from prelims
Remember when Brazier "jogged" the final 20m in his 1:45 breakthrough and people said he'd run 1:43... half of you said no way, the other half knew what they are talking about.
Fred is going to run 43.5 this season.
Kerley reaches 390m in 42.5high when he starts jogging. This is pace for a 43.6high. Anyone who thinks he only lost a tenth is just trolling or straight up estupido.
HGL wrote:
Remember when Brazier "jogged" the final 20m in his 1:45 breakthrough and people said he'd run 1:43... half of you said no way, the other half knew what they are talking about.
Fred is going to run 43.5 this season.
Fantastic 4x4, with WL by A&M. Had Kerley in a about 44.5, but freshman Allen of Auburn burns a 43.48 to go from 7th to 2nd on the anchor:
Am I the only one who saw the Alabama dude push Kerley to the wire on that leg? He actually out split Fred on that leg I think - I had 43.6-43.8 for Alabama - 44 low for Fred. Go watch it again. I heard those two dudes were on the same relay in juco at south plains...how nasty is that?
calculo wrote:
Wayde's g'ma wrote:If they raced the way it would play out would have kerley even or slightly ahead at 200, then 150 to go you would see wayde closing hard, passing Fred with 50m to go without a response and would put a 5-10m gap on him, making Fred look like he was standing stillis this a joke ?
Fred couda run ~ 43.6 for ideal race today
wade is ~ 0.6s quicker meaning gap is more like ~ 5m
& Fred has run this in May !!!
he coud be running 43-low by august if not burned out giving wade all the fight he coud ever want
A better race would be to see Fred vs lashawn. Lashawn isn't scared of Fred, he knows he has the superior 200m speed so he would hold him off.
eh ???
again a joke ???
Fred's 200 speed right now coud be as quick as 19.7, as quick as lashawn
lashawn is not running away from Fred with any "superior" 200 speed
G'ma is definitely reaching here, but at least they're making a valid argument. Calculo, all you're doing is running your mouth without any valid points. You, calculo, are definitely the bigger idiot out of the two of you.
calculo wrote:
more nonsense wrote:Wild Dominion wrote:
So the SEC meet is being covered by NBC?
That was a 43.7x that got put off.
He might have cracked 44.00
a helluva lot more than 44, more like cracking 43.8
The thought that he slowed down by .40 is patently stupid
learn some math
we are talking more 0.30s
you learn some math pythagoras wanna be.
Kerley ran 44.09 and posters are talking about it being a 43.7 with a slowdown. That's .39.
Tool.
Try 44.09 -44.39 and see what you get, Brainstein.
more nonsense wrote:
calculo wrote:a helluva lot more than 44, more like cracking 43.8
learn some math
we are talking more 0.30s
you learn some math pythagoras wanna be.
Kerley ran 44.09 and posters are talking about it being a 43.7 with a slowdown. That's .39.
Tool.
Yes, you are the only one that saw the Alabama guy.. that guy can't hold Fred's jock in a head to head race. So pipe down kiffin.
calculo wrote:
i definitely reckon the 1 day lack of rest cost him 1/2s compared to if 1 further day's rest
if he'd run final on sunday, it's quite possible he couda gone 43-high
hmm...
1 Fred Kerley
Texas A&M [SR]
43.70 Q 1 (1) 6
2 Wil London
Baylor [SO]
45.02 Q 2 (1) 5
3 Marcus Chambers
Oregon [SR]
45.03 Q 3 (1) 7
4 Aldrich Bailey Jr.
Texas [SR]
45.32 Q 2 (2) 8
5 Michael Norman
USC [FR]
45.38 Q 3 (2) 4
6 Ricky Morgan Jr
USC [JR]
45.44 Q 1 (2) 7
7 Mar'yea Harris
Iowa [SO]
45.45 Q
45.441
3 (3) 5
8 George Caddick
Baylor [SR]
45.45 Q
45.448
1 (3) 5
9 Mylik Kerley
Texas A&M [JR]
45.55 Q 2 (3) 7
10 Warren Hazel
Southern Illinois [SO]
45.70 q 1 (4) 4
7th fastest performer ever
How close was I!!!??? Thank you very much.
Decades as a NCAA DI coach and athlete lets me see talent, baby.
Great run from Kerley today and there's more in the tank.
HOLY SMOKES
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday