Hank Moody wrote:
You walk to talk about consistency when the reality is Hunter has almost zero experience at that level. Consistency in high school races where you are the best runner in the country is much different then performing consistently on the national stage.
Could have would make a hell of a lot more sense than would have.
I'm excited to see what Hunter can do, he is a serious talent. But it's just absurd to discuss him as someone who had any shot at making the olympic team.
There were around 30 guys that ran faster then 3:40.
I don't know whether Hunter can run faster than 1:48.6, I also don't care because you know who else can run faster than 1:48? Every single guy we have that's a threat to make the olympic team in the 1500m.
Hunter is a great talent, with a bright future. Let him be that.
The rate of success across all sports with U.S. H.S. athletes turning pro is only about 10%. Felix and Ajee Wilson are the only T&F athletes who had instant success and the book is still open on Candance Hill and the Lyles brothers. Right now, Hunter's marks would only make him a very good NCAA athlete. Why skip that level you can't master athletically, especially when there are so many other benefits to being an NCAA athlete like getting a free education? Even Alan Webb, who demonstrated more potential than Hunter should have stayed in college, which would stopped him from overtraining and taught him how to race.