bothways wrote:
gregmacd wrote:I think the caption was intentionally placed by her butt. Otherwise, they would have used a photo like Molly's:
https://goo.gl/ZFxPVmThat's a great picture. Looks natural. The Runner's World pic of Jordan looks fake.
+1
Somewhat offensive wrote:
The photo is fine, but the verbiage next to it, positioned where it is, is a little questionable. Not that I care about Jogger's World anyway, but I don't want my daughters emulating this mindset. So, we won't be buying it.
Emulating the mindset to ensure you stay fit and in shape so you avoid injury during aerobic exercising? I think that is exactly the mindset we should ALL have!
You just saw the word butt and hips and assumed the rest of the words in that sentence were about achievable beauty standards. You're like the guy who comments on a news story online but then everyone else attacks you for clearly not readying what the author actually wrote because all you did was read the headline.
Don't be a dumb dumb.
You're being a dumb dumb.
Stop it.
Yeppers wrote:
bothways wrote:That's a great picture. Looks natural. The Runner's World pic of Jordan looks fake.
+1
I'm fairly certain they did something weird with the Photoshop in the runners world one. Her quads are definitely not that big and long relative to her torso.
A more realistic less edited image of the same angle:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1a/6d/b6/1a6db6ac1dec3e1ff2322aa4fdabdd54.jpg(Sorry, I couldn't find any newer pics that would make for a good side by side comparison )
She is beauty she is grace wrote:
Yeppers wrote:+1
I'm fairly certain they did something weird with the Photoshop in the runners world one. Her quads are definitely not that big and long relative to her torso.
A more realistic less edited image of the same angle:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1a/6d/b6/1a6db6ac1dec3e1ff2322aa4fdabdd54.jpg(Sorry, I couldn't find any newer pics that would make for a good side by side comparison )
Nice link, thanks for sharing. That's the real Jordon right there. You can feel the energy.
The original white privilege. Getting on the cover of a magazine...as a legit runner... but only if you are white. I think.meseret defar made it but no other black person. Msst have been... give the negros a break decade.
Besides her running credentials, I find her boring and homogenized. If she would cut her hair and carry herself like a grown woman instead of a 12 year old being told what to do by the lame quote Nike machine, I would find her more interesting.
lease wrote:
Who cares about RW's cover? What actual runner looks at the magazine anyway?
I glanced at the cover and rolled my eyes when I saw the text about a better butt. Didn't even realize the cover was Jordan Hasay until I saw this thread. I figured it was just another cover model like they usually have.
Good grief I am surprised Runners World didn't spell her name
Jordan Hassay
My wife used to a cute behind like that, now its as wide as a bus.....
Runners world subscriber...... wrote:
She's a real cutie pie!!
+1
depressed married man wrote:
My wife used to a cute behind like that, now its as wide as a bus.....
pics?
Photoshopped butt, photoshopped arms, photoshopped face, photoshopped chest, photoshopped hair, photoshopped everything.
Jordan doesn't have much of an ass, like most distance runner girls.
CrossFit women are the ones with ass. Sprinters as well. You have to do a lot of heavy squats if you are a white girl and want an ass.
TrackCoach wrote:
Lobotomy wrote:I don't think this is a good picture of her. She's a natural beauty and looks awesome in most photos. Runner's World has somehow managed to make her look artificial. She looks like a mannequin. I bet they have 100 pictures from the shoot better than this one and more in their archives. Any amateur could have chosen a better cover shot. Great honor for Jordan, new low for Runner's World. Both well earned.
The picture is awesome and I know photos and the caption is perhaps slightly misplaced, but no more so than all the other magazines. The problem is, the senic always looks for something bad and always finds it.
Its funny how about of runners on this site become experts on how magazine covers sell themselves. I suggest any of you go into a store that sell magazines and take a look at covers that sell fitness and fashion.
There is nothing misplaced on the cover, they spend days revising and discussing what will sell the most , what will cause someone to pick the mag up etc.
Attractive women on covers sell.
Body improvement techniques sell.
Sex and romance dialog sells.
Great to see Jordan on the cover vs a model!
It's not sexual harrassment unless you say that you want to perform sex for fondle someone.
Jordan is amazing, going to pick up a copy so hopefully they will have her on the cover again.
Bump for more Jordan bumps.
markschultz25 wrote:
CrossFit women are the ones with ass. Sprinters as well. You have to do a lot of heavy squats if you are a white girl and want an ass.
I hereby present Katrin Davidsdottir.
http://i.vimeocdn.com/video/480513668_1280x720.jpgFitstigram wrote:
Runner's World should've used Molly Huddle if they wanted to promote a marathoner with a strong butt - Damn dat booty on her is incredible. Hasay not so much.
Cover should read: Jordans Sweet Little Ass
