Sleuth purchases race pictures and discovers that Ft Lauderdale 2nd place cheated to enter elite team

Not sure that's really Jane...doesn't matter.

And why is the thread asking why cutting a course at the top of the front page..but they won't acknowledge this story?

Because you haven't paid your tithe to LRC yet.

I can find one exception to it. "Only Rosie O'Donnell. Only. Thank you." I was gonna add Whoopi to that but Ted Danson has gone where no man has ever gone. A brave man. RIP.

WTF? This might be getting bigly strange and nasty. Like if Mike Rossi got into the mainstream.

doubler wrote:

http://imgur.com/a/rTjM6

Not sure that's really Jane...doesn't matter.

You'd think Miss Seo would just keep a low profile and hope that it all blows over rather than stoke the fire.

For a Harvard grad and media person she's not real smart, she's played right in to his hands and taken the bait and hook, line and sinker.

That is the same handle she had before her twitter was suspended. Looks like she got a re-set.

We are starting to see some similarities in their personalities.

Although she's not really wrong in her statement there.

Oh really wrote:

I haven't read the whole thread and it's probably been discussed. Did someone really buy someone else's race pictures just to see if they cheated?

A little overboard, eh?

"A little" overboard? I'd say A LOT!

I'm going over the Mesa-PHX Marathon results right now. I've found 3 definite cheaters and 2 possibles so far.

LRC Sleuth wrote:

I'm going over the Mesa-PHX Marathon results right now. I've found 3 definite cheaters and 2 possibles so far.

My favorite - Jeffrey Donnelly ran it. Looks like it may have been legit - or he cheated to a 5 hour finish.

Off-topic, but related to doubler's investigations.

Is there a way to get "chronotrack" results in flat text format?

A few bucks and a few clicks v. going back and biking the course at 1:21 pace? Not even close.

Linda Relsom wrote:

Oh really wrote:

I haven't read the whole thread and it's probably been discussed. Did someone really buy someone else's race pictures just to see if they cheated?

A little overboard, eh?

"A little" overboard? I'd say A LOT!

doubler wrote:

http://imgur.com/a/rTjM6

Not sure that's really Jane...doesn't matter.

And why is the thread asking why cutting a course at the top of the front page..but they won't acknowledge this story?

Is it possible that someone else registered the handle after she deleted her account?

Have you heard from her since you published the article?

I think the Brojos are a bit angry that they didn't make it to the BBC!

wippet wrote:

I think the Brojos are a bit angry that they didn't make it to the BBC!

The price of overmoderation.

whoahuhwut? wrote:

3:00 equates to 1:25, so I guess she couldn't get the standard through legit means.

uh-huh... close but no cigar..

Linda Relsom wrote:

Oh really wrote:

I haven't read the whole thread and it's probably been discussed. Did someone really buy someone else's race pictures just to see if they cheated?

A little overboard, eh?

"A little" overboard? I'd say A LOT!

There's a little "difference" between "cheating" for your own sake and CHEATING to take 2nd place no?

Or do you not see it that way?

Or have you not followed the many MANY steps and lies this person was willing to take to accomplish and cover up their cheating?

wippet wrote:

Is it possible that someone else registered the handle after she deleted her account?

:)

Are you saying she should have asked about the timer guy's "cigar"?

B. Clinton wrote:

whoahuhwut? wrote:

3:00 equates to 1:25, so I guess she couldn't get the standard through legit means.

uh-huh... close but no cigar..

The twitter is likely fake. Archive.org shows the same username with a join date of May 2011. Now the same username has a join date of Feb 2017.

Who Me? wrote:

[quote]wippet wrote:

Is it possible that someone else registered the handle after she deleted her account?