The only way to get guns out of the hands of young “minorities” is “to throw them up against the wall and frisk them”- Little Mikey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dUiQLCSmWY
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/opinion/michael-bloomberg-stop-frisk.html
Take that up with someone who supports and defends Bloomberg, that’s not me, got it boomer.
Be consistent in opposing racism trigged, otherwise you’re just a hypocrite and a foot soldier.
https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2017/02/trump-fbi-files-discrimination-case-235067
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/06/trump-racism-comments/588067/
https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history
Ciro wrote:
Be consistent in opposing racism trigged, otherwise you’re just a hypocrite and a foot soldier.
https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2017/02/trump-fbi-files-discrimination-case-235067https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/06/trump-racism-comments/588067/https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history
Yeah. Trump also defended stop and frisk when he was running against Hillary. He said it was a great thing for New York during one of the debates with Hillary. The Trumpers here who support him are ridiculous, and of course outrageously stupid. Doesn't matter what Trump says or does. Doesn't matter that he loved stop and frisk in 2016 but now uses it to paint Bloomberg as a bad guy. They have no integrity, no standards, other than swallowing hook, line, and sinker whatever Trump said last.
jesseriley wrote:
Nothing like owning the trumpanzee convicts.
Stone had a Trump bashing, activist democrat foreperson determining his fate. That should be grounds for a mistrial. Even Judge Nap (a Trump hater) is calling for Stone to get a new trial.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7998815/Tomeka-Hart-Roger-Stone-jury-foreperson-revealed-anti-Trump-activist.htmlhttps://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/13/roger-stone-lawyers-evaluating-trump-posts-by-jury-forewoman.htmlhttps://thehill.com/homenews/media/482932-foxs-napolitano-roger-stone-absolutely-entitled-to-new-trial-after-jurorsRigged’s head explodes.
Guardian already live, expecting another big day for bill barr, and not just when he steps on the scale!
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
That happens because democrats want to make illegal aliens first. Let's put our veterans & US citizens first.
America first!
And what has Tiny proposed to help homeless veterans?
Though in the last year veteran homelessness increased for the first time in a decade, the President zeroed out the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s funding for HUD-VASH vouchers, which provides housing options for homeless veterans.
agip wrote:
single wing wrote:
Hey look, Bernie polls better than all the moderates except for Mayor Mike and Buttigieg does the worst.
Aren't these head-to-head matchup polls the sort of thing the case for Biden's electibility was based on?
(I'm not saying they are reliable now, I am pointing out the things that make them dubious now also made them dubious when people were using them to say Biden was electable. I don't think they are worth much at all).
yeah, they aren't worth much agreed .Esp since Bernie hasn't seen any negative campaigning from Rs yet and Biden ah has seen some negative news stories about him and his family.
Plus, people are ashamed to tell pollsters they are Trumpists - we see that sense of shame for all the white nationalist parties around the globe.
Sanders also has the highest polling among African Americans now. He also has the highest favorability rating among non college educated white men.
He clearly and obviously has the most diverse coalition.
I expect agip to get on the Sanders train all along.
Sally Vix wrote:
The Dems here never really talk about it but what happens if Trump is re-elected? Forget about the smaller-type things that we usually talk about. The elephant in the room is the Supreme Court. Do you Dems think about that? The Court is already conservative, but if Trump wins later this year, he will most likely replace Ginsburg (I am hoping she merely steps down and wish the best to her for her health) with a conservative and likely another liberal with yet another conservative jurist. That would put the court at 7-2 in favor of conservatives. That will have much longer-lasting consequences than anything else. A conservative court such as that will produce changes that will last for 30-plus years.
Yes, McConnell's un-Constitutional move to block a vote on Garland, and Russia's assist to help Trump in 2016 changed the Supreme Court makeup for much more than 4 years.
And another Trump win may give a 30 year conservative majority rule. (the youngest Republican appointee is only 71)
Outside of that, most people's lives won't be affected much depending on how they consume news.
I know I'll be fine.
I actually think a Trump re-election would be devastating to the Republican party.
Their identity has been shattered. Four more years of Trump and the Republican identity will be irreversibly changed.
A new conservative party may take form. Not another Tea Party that joined Republicans under Obama, but one that will oppose them under Trump.
Republicans will go the way of the Whigs.
What will the new conservative party be called?
Fat hurts wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
That happens because democrats want to make illegal aliens first. Let's put our veterans & US citizens first.
America first!
And what has Tiny proposed to help homeless veterans?
Though in the last year veteran homelessness increased for the first time in a decade, the President zeroed out the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s funding for HUD-VASH vouchers, which provides housing options for homeless veterans.
Trump has implemented reforms to help our Veterans:
https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/469825-veterans-affairs-reform-is-now-reality-under-president-trumpSeeking increased funding in 2020:
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2020/02/10/va-programs-would-see-a-13-percent-funding-boost-under-trumps-fiscal-2021-budget-plan/Trollminator wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Pelosi wants to impeach a duly elected president of the United States of America for a 4-minute phone call and at the same time welcomes this type of behavior in her city. Any one seeing a disconnect?
Your obsession with finding pics of homeless Californians is a little weird. Did someone in your family go homeless and you’re resenting that now?
I have never found a pic of a homeless person.
jesseriley wrote:
Guardian already live, expecting another big day for bill barr, and not just when he steps on the scale!
How come not one Dem here has not condemned Jesse for making fun of Barr's weight? You ripped me to shreds for inartfully suggesting that Zoe Lofgren might be a carrying around a few too many pounds. Are you principled enough to criticize Jesse for saying what he said - or you are just political hacks? Zoe is a Dem - so we will protect her? Barr is a Trump crony so it is open season on him? Show some integrity and call out Jesse for making fun of Barr's weight. Do the right thing for once!
Sally’s head explodes. We’re running out of trumpanzees. Medic!
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
And what has Tiny proposed to help homeless veterans?
Trump has implemented reforms to help our Veterans:
https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/469825-veterans-affairs-reform-is-now-reality-under-president-trumpSeeking increased funding in 2020:
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2020/02/10/va-programs-would-see-a-13-percent-funding-boost-under-trumps-fiscal-2021-budget-plan/
Tiny proposed cuts for homeless veterans. You can't whitewash that fact so stop trying.
Fat Hurts - what kind of car/truck do you drive? You are the biggest proponent of saving the planet here and biggest Global Warming person. I really hope you drive a Prius or similar type of car.
Also, can you please post a pic of your bus/train ticket here? You surely are using public transportation. Thanks!
single wing wrote:
agip wrote:
yeah, they aren't worth much agreed .Esp since Bernie hasn't seen any negative campaigning from Rs yet and Biden ah has seen some negative news stories about him and his family.
Plus, people are ashamed to tell pollsters they are Trumpists - we see that sense of shame for all the white nationalist parties around the globe.
Sanders also has the highest polling among African Americans now. He also has the highest favorability rating among non college educated white men.
He clearly and obviously has the most diverse coalition.
I expect agip to get on the Sanders train all along.
I don't think it's true that Sanders polls best among African Americans.
I do think Sanders might poll best among all non-white voters though.
Maybe you confused those two stats.
Look, I'm going to vote for anyone running against Trump. I think Sanders is winning only because of a split moderate vote and I think he will run weakly against Trump, and have short coattails in other races such as the house and senate. I am not a socialist and I am not a leftist. This country is neither leftist or socialist. I do not support much of what Sanders supports. I think Sanders would be like Corbyn in the UK...just the wrong answer to populist rightism.
But I'd vote for him in a nano-second over trump.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
Nothing like owning the trumpanzee convicts.
Stone had a Trump bashing, activist democrat foreperson determining his fate. That should be grounds for a mistrial. Even Judge Nap (a Trump hater) is calling for Stone to get a new trial.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7998815/Tomeka-Hart-Roger-Stone-jury-foreperson-revealed-anti-Trump-activist.htmlhttps://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/13/roger-stone-lawyers-evaluating-trump-posts-by-jury-forewoman.htmlhttps://thehill.com/homenews/media/482932-foxs-napolitano-roger-stone-absolutely-entitled-to-new-trial-after-jurors
He's a proven crook and you are trying too hard to pretend he isn't, get over it
Sally Vix wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Your obsession with finding pics of homeless Californians is a little weird. Did someone in your family go homeless and you’re resenting that now?
I have never found a pic of a homeless person.
That was meant for your boy trigged - sorry sally
Sally Vix wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
Guardian already live, expecting another big day for bill barr, and not just when he steps on the scale!
How come not one Dem here has not condemned Jesse for making fun of Barr's weight? You ripped me to shreds for inartfully suggesting that Zoe Lofgren might be a carrying around a few too many pounds. Are you principled enough to criticize Jesse for saying what he said - or you are just political hacks? Zoe is a Dem - so we will protect her? Barr is a Trump crony so it is open season on him? Show some integrity and call out Jesse for making fun of Barr's weight. Do the right thing for once!
No troll - you didn't just suggest she might be carrying around a few extra pounds... go back and repost your original comments