Nice link to the trial & conviction of the Chinese spy who crashed Spy-a-Lago in March!
Nice link to the trial & conviction of the Chinese spy who crashed Spy-a-Lago in March!
Only the best security at Mar-a Lago. That is also the place where Trump introduced a 15 year old girl he had hired to Epstein because she was beautiful. Epstein recruited her with Trump's permission.
Half-way there wrote:
all the way there wrote:
You sound like you just entered middle school.
Thanks!
My English class is fun. :-)
Thanks for this. Regardless of bias, there is no equivalence between trump and any other politician. He can’t have it both ways. He came in pretty much selling himself as a dirty player who doesn’t stick by the rules and can’t possibly expect that the extra scrutiny he’s receiving isn’t warranted. He is no victim and if this kind of conduct isn’t fiercely attacked we stop being a rule of law country.
Stark differences between he and Biden. Biden was publicly pressuring the Ukraine to get rid of a corrupt prosecutor with the backing of Congress. This issue with Biden has been looked into, they found nada. Compare that to Trump, who secretly asked the Ukrainian President to do him a favor and look into the Biden issue. The Biden issue is not a national security risk or priority. He didn’t ask the President to look into corruption in general, he asked him to look into Biden, this during a discussion about aid. By the way, Giuliani was openly boasting about working with Ukraine to look into Biden to help Trump. Yes, those words came out of his mouth, and that was in May. It boils down to Trump openly abusing his power for personal gain. All the elements are present, there is no way to argue that is not abuse of power at the very least.
We have a situation whereby Trump’s definition of ethical conduct has extended to his party and base, so that he gets shielded for committing a crime just because his supporters have a different set of standards for him.
Step back and think about this - what would the general reaction be if this it was Obama or Bush doing this? If you can’t say that it would have been the most scandalous thing ever you are just completely disconnected from reality. Trump and the truth don’t live on the same planet... he is a walking lie and he gets a pass. I agree with some your arguments, but will say that there are degrees of good and bad ethics and there has to be a firm threshold for that. Nixon got impeached for arguably something less serious than what has already been proven about Trump. If you look at the underlying behavior, Clinton’s sleeping around and small time real estate dealings (unproven of course) was small potatoes. Was the standard for those presidents different? Apparently so. I say absolutely not and we all need to wake back up to the reality of the damage that is being done to the office if we keep pretending Trump’s conduct is equivalent to anything before him.
Btw US Special Envoy to the Ukraine resigned.
Trollminator wrote:
Btw US Special Envoy to the Ukraine resigned.
Who just happened to be the person who, along with Giuliani, set up the call with the Ukrainian President Zelensky during Trump tried to make his illegal "deal".
One big difference is that asked the Ukraine for interference to help him get elected and he payed for it with taxpayer money. That's illegal. He also attempted to use our attorney General for a partisan dirt digging mission.
You know it's bad when even Never Trumper John Kasich is warning the Dems about this impeachment inquiry. He said "no one in Ohio is even talking about this (Ukraine)"
In other news, $13M raised for Trump's reelection campaign since Botox Pelosi's impeachment announcement.
KAG2020
Lindsey Graham used to be a never-trumper, too. Ah, the good ol’ days, when the GOP wasn’t 100% traitors.
Conundrum wrote:
One big difference is that Trump asked (no "the") Ukraine for interference to help him get elected and he payed for it with taxpayer money. That's illegal. He also attempted to use our attorney General for a partisan dirt digging mission.
Fixed that up for you.
Also, you are CORRECT!
jesseriley wrote:
Lindsey Graham used to be a never-trumper, too. Ah, the good ol’ days, when the GOP wasn’t 100% traitors.
Shouldn’t we wait to charge Donald until after the election so Pence can’t pardon him? He’s going to spend the rest of his life in jail, it’s really obvious to me.
jesseriley wrote:
Lindsey Graham used to be a never-trumper, too. Ah, the good ol’ days, when the GOP wasn’t 100% traitors.
I agree with you . . . BUT a reasonable hypothesis is that ALL national level politicians are essentially the same (here, "ALL" should be taken to mean something like 99%). All Republican AND all Democrat national level politicians are spineless, self-serving worms.
That is not to say that how the Dems are acting is the same as how the Republicans are acting. That is also not to say that anything that Obama did (or Bush did or . . . ) is at all comparable to what Trump does on a daily basis. It is simply to say that all of these national level politicians will do whatever it takes to get re-elected. Cross Trump and you are out of office if you are a GOP senator, representative, or administration official. So, nobody crosses Trump.
This is not so much party over country as self over country. Are the Democrats any different? How many would fight the good fight against the mainstream of their own party, knowing it was political suicide?
Perhaps this hypothesis is true. Perhaps not. Either way, it is reasonable to ask what any of this implies about two things:
A) The American electorate
B) The American electoral system
Why do we elect spineless, self-serving worms? (a complementary hypothesis is that many Americans - both conservatives and progressives - are not spineless, self-serving worms - why do they never seem to get into national level political positions?)
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
You know it's bad when even Never Trumper John Kasich is warning the Dems about this impeachment inquiry. He said "no one in Ohio is even talking about this (Ukraine)"
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/463367-kasich-warns-democrats-on-impeachment-its-not-a-light-matterIn other news, $13M raised for Trump's reelection campaign since Botox Pelosi's impeachment announcement.
https://www.boston25news.com/news/trump-raises-13m-after-pelosi-announces-impeachment-inquiry/990725255KAG2020
Why would anyone talk to Kasich? He is not in office. Trumpers don't like him because he has long been critical of Trump. Democrats don't like him because he's a conservative. You do not know anything, dumb dumb.
There’s actually an article in the Guardian about Fox. They’re struggling with internal divisions over their coverage of the call to Ukraine. Even some of their analysts admit it was a crime. Oh, no!
He sold his soul to keep his senate seat. Was very unpopular with his voters when he was anti-Trump, but gained them back by converting. Guessing he wouldn't have become a Trump stooge if McCain was still alive.
Let me add two things which I havent see stated above:
(1) The single biggest issue for Trump--from my reading of the Complaint and the Transcript--is his advocacy for his personal attorney on an official State call. There is no way around that.
(2) When Joe Biden publicly pressured for the removal of a prosecutor, it was NOT so he would drop a prosecution against the company that son had a board seat on. It was because the prosecutor WASN'T going after that company (who was corrupt). If anything, Joe Biden--and our EU allies--were lobbying for something that would hurt Hunter Biden. That's a major difference.
Interesting thoughts. Although you briefly address Trump's situation as being worse, most of your post points to a hypothetical false equivalency. If democrats were in this position they would do the same thing and support a lying law breaking president.
I have two issues with that. (1) It seems to be the defense that yeah it's not right but everybody does it so It's no big deal. With the logical implication, so lets not be shocked or outraged or have significant punishment. It's just politics.
(2) Democrats are known to "eat their own" and do not follow lockstep with leaders as much as republicans. You don't know what democrats would do in this situation. But we do know how republicans responded to this abuse of power.
Your question about why we readily elect ask serving worms is a good one. Here's my take on that. A politician who is not a self serving worm will be honest with the electorate and tell them both the things they want to hear and the truthful but difficult things to hear. We won't elect that person. The person who tells us how great and easy things will be is the person we elect. We will always chose lies that make us feel good over honesty.
These fools let Rigged change the subject line and kept posting it.
More news about Dan Coats firing at an earlier stage of the Ukraine coverup. Normally zero news on Saturday.
You appear to have reading comprehension problem. That is a shame, but it is not something that I can help you with.
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06