Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Star Witness wrote:

What??! wrote:

Really?

You would have thought that he wouldn't risk years in prison the first time he lied to Congress either.

LOL

The dems star witness is a criminal liar....and of course he's now being a truthful witness....hahaha these liberals are just pathetic.

He stated he's already been talking about book and movie deals....and could receive lesser sentence in jail.....yet were supposed to believe he's credible. if you believe this guy YOU ARE A MORON.

We can't be sure to believe him regarding ANYTHING for which he doesn't have corroboration, but, especially for the FELONY campaign finance law violation, he has checks with Trump's signature on them, and not that it matters, but they were signed AFTER Trump was in office...so proof that Trump committed a felony as the President of the United States (also for sure corroborated by Alan Weisselberg -- Trump is dead to rights on this). We also have proof that he sent letters to schools and the College Board threatening them to not release grades or SAT scores, so while that doesn't cover up a crime, it does of course cover up Trump's fake persona as a "genius".

So, I already know Trump to be a racist just based on his public behavior, so I don't need Cohen's say so on that, and his comment there has nothing to do with anything legal, so I'm not terribly interested in it. Kind of like saying Trump has a bad haircut.

Congress has never called someone to testify before Congress who PREVIOUSLY LIED TO CONGRESS!!! Lol. Their star witness has already lied to them before and now they are treating him like the most honest person ever. Oh, and yeah, Cohen has already admitted there was no Russian collusion. Sorry, Libs ... but the gig is up! You lost yet again!

Cohen lied when filling out paperwork prior to testimony. This guy just can't stop.

local lib wrote:

Keep America Great 2020 wrote:

Cute - I see you are parroting the idiot liberal in the house.

Not parroting anyone, just pointing out the obvious.

the obvious is that this "witness" is a joke and lies out of his ass.

Fat hurts wrote:

does it work both ways? wrote:

Cohen is clearly a liar. So Trump is at fault for employing a liar. Hardly a crime. Take off your liberal goggles buddy.

Great observation. He won't go to prison for hiring a liar.

Instead, Individual-1 will go to prison for the actual crimes he committed.

haha dream on. #6moreyears

Fat hurts wrote:

does it work both ways? wrote:

Cohen is clearly a liar. So Trump is at fault for employing a liar. Hardly a crime. Take off your liberal goggles buddy.

Great observation. He won't go to prison for hiring a liar.

Instead, Individual-1 will go to prison for the actual crimes he committed.

CORRECT!

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Great observation. He won't go to prison for hiring a liar.

Instead, Individual-1 will go to prison for the actual crimes he committed.

CORRECT!

And Mueller has not found any crimes. Cohen has said no collusion. And Congress is not finding any crimes. You Liberals become more pathetic by the day.

Sally Vix wrote:

Congress has never called someone to testify before Congress who PREVIOUSLY LIED TO CONGRESS!!! Lol.

So tell us what lies he was convicted of and the truth that he was trying to hide.

But you aren’t mad that he lied to defend the President.

Cohen testified that there are crimes Trump committed that he can't talk about because the SDNY is investigating them.

Was suspected that they were, but now we know for sure. Not a surprise to me.

Cohen is going to prison lmao

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

CORRECT!

And Mueller has not found any crimes. Cohen has said no collusion. And Congress is not finding any crimes. You Liberals become more pathetic by the day.

You Trumpers are hilarious. You say Cohen is not to be believed but then you say he said there was no collusion, so that should be true. Actually though Cohen has NOT said there was not any collusion. He said he can't say that there was. There is a BIG difference between those two things. He has also said recently in an interview that "I have my suspicions" regarding Russia collusion.

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

And Mueller has not found any crimes. Cohen has said no collusion. And Congress is not finding any crimes. You Liberals become more pathetic by the day.

You Trumpers are hilarious. You say Cohen is not to be believed but then you say he said there was no collusion, so that should be true. Actually though Cohen has NOT said there was not any collusion. He said he can't say that there was. There is a BIG difference between those two things. He has also said recently in an interview that "I have my suspicions" regarding Russia collusion.

Please don't call me a Trumper. I AM an anti-reverse-the-election because we hate the person who rightfully won. What the Democrats are trying to do is beyond the pale. They refuse to accept that Trump won the election fairly. It is time to give it up and just let the man (whom I despise) serve out the remaining two years.

Cohen lies again wrote:

Cohen lied when filling out paperwork prior to testimony. This guy just can't stop.

wrong.

actually the R congressman pushing that story had it wrong or was lying to us - the paperwork was filled out correctly but the Rep did not understand it as well as cohen did.

Sally Vix,

You continue to show that you do not know enough about these investigations into Trump to be making any comments. You should be asking questions only or staying silent. You are way out of your depth on this subject.

In the last two days, you showed no knowledge that anyone close to Trump has attacked Cohen, and just now you stated that Cohen said there was no collusion when that is not what he said, and you clearly didn't know of his recent interview where he talked about not having proof but had suspicions.

You can have opinions based on knowledge, but your opinions are based on a big lacking of knowledge.

Again, you should ask questions for the purpose of your own edification, or you should stay silent, because you really don't know enough to be making declarations.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You Trumpers are hilarious. You say Cohen is not to be believed but then you say he said there was no collusion, so that should be true. Actually though Cohen has NOT said there was not any collusion. He said he can't say that there was. There is a BIG difference between those two things. He has also said recently in an interview that "I have my suspicions" regarding Russia collusion.

Please don't call me a Trumper. I AM an anti-reverse-the-election because we hate the person who rightfully won. What the Democrats are trying to do is beyond the pale. They refuse to accept that Trump won the election fairly. It is time to give it up and just let the man (whom I despise) serve out the remaining two years.

I will stop calling you a Trumper when you stop being one. You are defending and supporting him...that is the definition of a Trumper.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You Trumpers are hilarious. You say Cohen is not to be believed but then you say he said there was no collusion, so that should be true. Actually though Cohen has NOT said there was not any collusion. He said he can't say that there was. There is a BIG difference between those two things. He has also said recently in an interview that "I have my suspicions" regarding Russia collusion.

Please don't call me a Trumper. I AM an anti-reverse-the-election because we hate the person who rightfully won. What the Democrats are trying to do is beyond the pale. They refuse to accept that Trump won the election fairly. It is time to give it up and just let the man (whom I despise) serve out the remaining two years.

Not a Trumper? You are in denial my man.

Wanting the criminal in the oval office to be held accountable is much different then wanting the the election reversed.

But we should expect that spin from a Trumper.

"Just let him serve out his term" like his the magistrate in some hill billy town - you're so lost its sad.

Sally Vix wrote:

Congress has never called someone to testify before Congress who PREVIOUSLY LIED TO CONGRESS!!! Lol. Their star witness has already lied to them before and now they are treating him like the most honest person ever. Oh, and yeah, Cohen has already admitted there was no Russian collusion. Sorry, Libs ... but the gig is up! You lost yet again!

You are wrong as usual.

Just off the top of my head, I can think of Oliver North. He came before congress and admitted that he had lied in previous testimony.

Lots and lots of liars have appeared multiple times before congress. And you can bet that they lied in each appearance.

This might be the first time a person convicted of lying to congress has appeared. You would need to do a lot of research to know for sure.

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix,

You continue to show that you do not know enough about these investigations into Trump to be making any comments. You should be asking questions only or staying silent. You are way out of your depth on this subject.

In the last two days, you showed no knowledge that anyone close to Trump has attacked Cohen, and just now you stated that Cohen said there was no collusion when that is not what he said, and you clearly didn't know of his recent interview where he talked about not having proof but had suspicions.

You can have opinions based on knowledge, but your opinions are based on a big lacking of knowledge.

Again, you should ask questions for the purpose of your own edification, or you should stay silent, because you really don't know enough to be making declarations.

Flagpole, I know a heck of a lot about everything than you do. I am not the wild-assed partisan that you are. I am not a Trumper. I do respect the office of the presidency and I do resent you nutjob Liberals trying to reverse the election. I get it - you live in some rural town in Ohio. Maybe don't even have a bathroom inside the house. I get all that. You have no credibility Flagpole. None whatsoever. You are not even educated it seems. I see a surfeit of grammar mistakes from you all the time. I made one type "dumbe" the other day and you went crazy about it. Again, you maybe are not the most sophisticated person on here but I do kind of respect your views when they are not wildly partisan. Maybe you never had the advantage of getting a good education. But, since you "own" a company and are at home all day, maybe spend some time studying english and grammar. I don't hold your lack of education against you. But, you still have time to improve yourself.