Jill Stein: "We might get a more accurate count of the Green votes"

Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.

Sad for Green loonies wrote:

jjjjjj wrote:

what harm does a recount do if it provides a more accurate count of the vote?

a) It is not clear that recounts produce more accurate counts

This is dishonest. A recount provides evidence the process is accurate. No reasonable person demands perfect accuracy. In the States/districts where recounts have happened there seems to be good election process integrity.

Meanwhile, Trump's absurd and inflammatory claims reinforce his image as a first rate buffoon.

Heavily Democratic town wrote:

Voting machines in more than one-third of all Detroit precincts registered more votes than they should have during last month’s presidential election, according to Wayne County records prepared at the request of The Detroit News.

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/12/records-many-votes-detroits-precincts/95363314/

Of the data available, though, machines tallied at least 388 more ballots, according to a Detroit News analysis of the records. That’s 0.16 percent of the 248,000 ballots cast in the city.

Jordan Brueckner, a spokeswoman for Stein's recount drive, told

FoxNews.com that all 161,000-plus donors will have a say in where the

extra money is donated - a task perhaps easier said than done.

Let Our Donors Decide!

1) We will send out a poll to each recount donor, asked them to participate in a Ranked Choice Voting process, to choose the recipients of surplus funds.

2) Donors will rank organizations in their order of preference (1st choice, 2nd choice and so on).

3) We will want to donate to multiple organizations. Fortunately, ranked choice voting can be used for single winner elections like President but can also be used to select multiple winners, for a fair and proportional result.

From Stein's website wrote:

Let Our Donors Decide!

1) We will send out a poll to each recount donor, asked them to participate in a Ranked Choice Voting process, to choose the recipients of surplus funds.

2) Donors will rank organizations in their order of preference (1st choice, 2nd choice and so on).

3) We will want to donate to multiple organizations. Fortunately, ranked choice voting can be used for single winner elections like President but can also be used to select multiple winners, for a fair and proportional result.

Is it based on how *much* they gave ($1 = 1 vote), or is it "1 donor 1 vote"?

Looks like the jig is up. "Trump country" in Michigan had no voter integrity problems. On the other hand,

Napolitano said that based on the massive scale of the over-counted votes, the effort was "organized, and government involved."

the results in Detroit look like they could have come from Chicago. Perhaps an audit of Cook County votes would have similar results, as would audits in Baltimore, Philadelphia, St, Louis, and many other Democrat-controlled big city precincts.

The Democrats keep crowing that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, but I strongly suspect that she only did so with the help of systemic voter- and election-fraud strategies in major cities.

Every vote counts, many times wrote:

Looks like the jig is up. "Trump country" in Michigan had no voter integrity problems. On the other hand,

Napolitano said that based on the massive scale of the over-counted votes, the effort was "organized, and government involved."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py5bektJXG4

the results in Detroit look like they could have come from Chicago. Perhaps an audit of Cook County votes would have similar results, as would audits in Baltimore, Philadelphia, St, Louis, and many other Democrat-controlled big city precincts.

The Democrats keep crowing that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, but I strongly suspect that she only did so with the help of systemic voter- and election-fraud strategies in major cities.

Ahem, Trump had 5000 "extra" votes removed in WI and 22,000 "too many" votes removed in PA.

------

President-elect Donald Trump’s margin of victory in Pennsylvania is shrinking as more counties finish tallying their votes. An updated count Friday by state election officials shows Trump’s lead over Democrat Hillary Clinton has shrunk to 49,000, from 71,000.

--

As Wisconsin prepares for an official recount, 5000 fake Trump votes have already been subtracted from Trump’s lead

--