That wasn't the challenge. The challenge is to get from you a direct answer to a direct question. The subject of the thread is that Kipchoge is doping - which was also argued by "John Walker". You don't accept his argument. So is Kipchoge doping or not?
I asked first, and you have yet to give a direct answer to my direct question. Since you are responding to me, and not the OP, that is the only relevant question.
Recall the anonymous poster "John Walker" said 1) that doping never produced a result anywhere near Kipchoge's consistently, in all of history, and 2) that dopers have always been ahead of testers. Then he says that doping is the *only* explanation for something that never happened in all the history of doping. Does that make any sense? How?
You spoke before of "convincing arguments" -- do you have any that might nullify any null hypotheses?
You also spoke before of Kenyans succeeding due to a "variety of other factors"? What did you mean by that?
If you want answers to questions about "John Walker's" arguments you need to address them to him not to me. My view is that Kipchoge is an aging athlete who continues to produce superhuman performances even as he ages and he comes from a culture that is one of the worst for doping in the sport. In all likelihood, he dopes. In that I agree with "John Walker".
However, you reject "John Walker's" arguments, which suggests you think Kipchoge doesn't dope. But for pages you have avoided addressing that specific question when asked - and it is after all the subject of the thread - which suggests you cannot mount a convincing argument for that conclusion or you would have done so.
If you want answers to questions about "John Walker's" arguments you need to address them to him not to me. My view is that Kipchoge is an aging athlete who continues to produce superhuman performances even as he ages and he comes from a culture that is one of the worst for doping in the sport. In all likelihood, he dopes. In that I agree with "John Walker".
However, you reject "John Walker's" arguments, which suggests you think Kipchoge doesn't dope. But for pages you have avoided addressing that specific question when asked - and it is after all the subject of the thread - which suggests you cannot mount a convincing argument for that conclusion or you would have done so.
I addressed the question to the whole forum, and it was you who chose to reply to me.
If you want answers to questions about Kipchoge, you need to address them to him.