Kipyegon looked waaay too fresh in the last 100m of that WR. Unfortunately decades of following the sport cause skepticism, not excitement about these type of performances.
You don't realise it but you are still doing exactly what I have said you do, which is justifying yourself. You try to do that because your arguments are empty cr*p.
Still too many words?
You are doing what I always say -- when you've run out of crap arguments, you -- ooh look squirrel -- try to make it about me.
Kipyegon looked waaay too fresh in the last 100m of that WR. Unfortunately decades of following the sport cause skepticism, not excitement about these type of performances.
I know you'll probably see this as evidence of everyone doping but when you look at many of the very best of the best finishing a race (Rudisha, Jakob, Kipchoge) their form is unchanged and they look 'fresh'. Others are visibly straining e.g. Farah, Muir, Hassan. Don't think it means much tbh.
No way Muir is clean. She ran sub 3:55 which is a clear indication that she's on drugs. At least according to some posters anyway.
Naturally you are correct. With over 30% at worlds admittedly doping, it will be hard for any clean athlete to reach the final. Medaling - top 3 out of over 40 competitors - is next to impossible with statistically over 12 dopers, especially in such a dirty event like the women's 1500.
Your stupid arguments are only about you, nothing objective.
I could take you seriously if you ever once backed up your conclusions and opinions with real world evidence, rather than repeatedly restating your unsupported beliefs.
I said a few pages back that you take or leave my arguments, as you wish.
Yet here we are again -- you so want to dispute my "arguments" that challenge decades of your gullibly formed personal beliefs, but you cannot do it to any accepted intellectual standard. The best you can do is call them "stupid", and resort to these childish games.
Your stupid arguments are only about you, nothing objective.
I could take you seriously if you ever once backed up your conclusions and opinions with real world evidence, rather than repeatedly restating your unsupported beliefs.
I said a few pages back that you take or leave my arguments, as you wish.
Yet here we are again -- you so want to dispute my "arguments" that challenge decades of your gullibly formed personal beliefs, but you cannot do it to any accepted intellectual standard. The best you can do is call them "stupid", and resort to these childish games.
It amuses me how everything is converted to your delusionary version of reality. Such is a gross narcissist - and especially an ill-informed one, as Sage Canaday so pithily described you.
Just let your eyes and your brain do the work. Look at the times. Compare the body types between say the 70's amd 80's to now. Look at the doubles people are doing. Look at the sheer volume of incredible times, sometimes from people with very little elite background. Look how many are getting caught. No one is clean, it's just matter of the level of dirtiness.
No one is clean coevett?
In the Top 5?
Top 10
Top 20?
Topo 50?
Top 100?
What an irrelevant series of questions. No answer will prove or disprove the actual incidence of doping. Doping is a fact, not an opinion. It is known for a fact to be widespread in the sport. It is beside the point whether it is only some or almost all at the top. It is pervasive enough - the view of WADA is that athletics in that regard is like bodybuilding, weightlifting and cycling - that no athlete at the top can be trusted to be clean, and they probably aren't.
I could take you seriously if you ever once backed up your conclusions and opinions with real world evidence, rather than repeatedly restating your unsupported beliefs.
I said a few pages back that you take or leave my arguments, as you wish.
Yet here we are again -- you so want to dispute my "arguments" that challenge decades of your gullibly formed personal beliefs, but you cannot do it to any accepted intellectual standard. The best you can do is call them "stupid", and resort to these childish games.
It amuses me how everything is converted to your delusionary version of reality. Such is a gross narcissist - and especially an ill-informed one, as Sage Canaday so pithily described you.
I'm sure you are easily amused. Your life must be full of bliss.
What amuses me now is that you've been called a narcissist repeatedly for weeks, and suddenly, this has become a new word added to your vocabulary. I've long believe that all of your personal insults are just recycled insults you have received -- maybe for as long as five decades. You were hurt by them at the time, and your defense mechanism is to use these terms that hurt you on others.
I'll make it easier for you -- instead of resorting to false arrogance and ignorantly judging others, why not actually back up any of your opinions with verifiable facts drawn from your own delusional version of reality.
Instead of hiding behind others like a coward, stand up for your own beliefs by providing factual support for them.
It amuses me how everything is converted to your delusionary version of reality. Such is a gross narcissist - and especially an ill-informed one, as Sage Canaday so pithily described you.
I'm sure you are easily amused. Your life must be full of bliss.
What amuses me now is that you've been called a narcissist repeatedly for weeks, and suddenly, this has become a new word added to your vocabulary. I've long believe that all of your personal insults are just recycled insults you have received -- maybe for as long as five decades. You were hurt by them at the time, and your defense mechanism is to use these terms that hurt you on others.
I'll make it easier for you -- instead of resorting to false arrogance and ignorantly judging others, why not actually back up any of your opinions with verifiable facts drawn from your own delusional version of reality.
Instead of hiding behind others like a coward, stand up for your own beliefs by providing factual support for them.
I take nothing you say with any degree of seriousness. It is all merely your ill-informed dogma. The only thing I can be bothered doing is highlighting the feebleness of your arguments. I do that because you are the worst propagandist on this site.
I'm sure you are easily amused. Your life must be full of bliss.
What amuses me now is that you've been called a narcissist repeatedly for weeks, and suddenly, this has become a new word added to your vocabulary. I've long believe that all of your personal insults are just recycled insults you have received -- maybe for as long as five decades. You were hurt by them at the time, and your defense mechanism is to use these terms that hurt you on others.
I'll make it easier for you -- instead of resorting to false arrogance and ignorantly judging others, why not actually back up any of your opinions with verifiable facts drawn from your own delusional version of reality.
Instead of hiding behind others like a coward, stand up for your own beliefs by providing factual support for them.
I take nothing you say with any degree of seriousness.
At last you admit that you ignore facts, studies and science.
The last time Genzebe dibaba ran a 1500, she ran 3.54 and 3.55 in 2019....is that not 5 seconds?
Also, it was at a hotel and not a training camp, please get your facts right and Jama Aden was never charged with anything, Genzebe has been running since she was a Junior till now, hasn't failed a test.
Another thing Kipyegon out of all those times literally races to within seconds of her PB every single season since 2013. Get out of here with your forced narrative.
The only thing i can't wait for is for when Salazar gets a book deal. Then we'll see about Mo, Hassan and the rest.
I take nothing you say with any degree of seriousness. It is all merely your ill-informed dogma. The only thing I can be bothered doing is highlighting the feebleness of your arguments. I do that because you are the worst propagandist on this site.
It's not my concern what you take or don't. As I said in an earlier post you didn't read (too many words), everyone can read my posts, or not, and take it or leave it.
Yet, nothing would make me happier than for anyone to actually show "the feebleness of my arguments". One way to do that is by "backing up your conclusions and opinions with real world evidence".
Ways to fail are false arrogance, personal insults, ignorant judgements, baseless opinions/conclusions, and name-calling.
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.