Good swing wrote:
Here’s the raw deal, KD focuses on those that are NCAA national talent and they know the why as far as his training philosophy goes. He will not baby developmental kids, you have to take ownership and work hard to earn that. “That” being him giving you more attention and insight as into what he’s trying to accomplish with you. The guy plans the training he just doesn’t feel the need to explain it to every single kid on the team whenever they asked. An ego, of course but not irrationally, everything has its purpose. Weak minded kids will fail miserably as one of his athletes because he won’t coddle you that’s for sure!
I don't know anything about the man as a coach, only as a runner, so my question is not so much about Robinson's coaching, but rather the defense given above.
If Robinson is really helping only those who he thinks have top talent understand the purpose of the workouts and the way the training cycle for the season will fit together despite being asked by his other athletes, that strikes me as a pretty poor job of coaching. First, it really isn't any extra work to help your athletes understand why they are doing what they are doing. It can be part of the discussion in which you tell them what the workout is. So the whole won't coddle/ you have to earn it/etc. idea really doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Telling someone why they are doing a workout isn't coddling.
Second, creating classes of "haves" and "have nots" is rarely a good way to build a happy and cohesive team that people want to be a part of. If a coach cannot see that team moral is an important part of the college experience and an important part of a successful team, then that coach is not the kind of coach that will be hired at many places.
Again, I am talking in the abstract in response to some third party's defense of Robinson. For all I know, he doesn't need to be defended in the first place, and the defense given may not be accurate.