Breaking: Victor Conte Claims Huge Doping Cover Up At The 1988 Olympics With Flo-Jo And Others; Corruption In WADA

In a way it already is legal. They have leveled the playing field with the biopassport, so that the allowable limit is quite low-microdosing. This is much safer and more fair for the athletes than what some have done in the past, raising red blood cells to over 50%, for example. Where it becomes a problem is telling kids that its okay to dope.

calling a spade a spade wrote:

The elites are doping and have been for decades. The top college runners are doping and have been for decades. The top high school runners are doping and have been for years. A coach is measured by his connection to PED markets, not by his training strategy. There are so many stories out there of the top runners doping. The problem is that so many are doing it that it would ruin the sport to disqualify everyone. Seriously, there are some Olympic races, maybe most, that everyone would be disqualified if the released the tests. And if they did pass it was only because they found a way to pass the test. You can't have competitive running without doping.

So what is the solution???? Legalize.

Nice try, Rojo. Your previous "NOP BREAKING NEWS" thing went nowhere, so now you are leaning on that paragon of virtue, Mr Conte. Pathetic.

Admit it Wejo

Give me a break wrote:

Exactly what makes anyone believe Victor Conte is credible?

How many more Seppelt stories do there have to be?

As a reminder, the head of the IOC swept EPO/oxygen vector doping positives under the rug at Salt Lake City games.

The American cycling federation did not sanction Armstrong once as an elite under-23 despite being doped to the gills. Many, many doped cyclists never tested positive by the federation once EPO was introduced.

At this point, there is a LLLLLLOOOOOOOONNNNNNGGGGGG history of doping and the IOC being perfectly okay with it.

Mo went public with his blood level results. Surely he wouldn't mind WADA checking his old urine.

I'll go first. Check mine...

Mo???

Crickets...

Actually, if he did that, I'd become a Mo fan forever...

Thanks for the link. Very educational.

Seb Coe (if you win). Institute the CIR on the top 8 in the world, in all events starting now.

A cleaner Olympics would most likely be the product.

already legal wrote:

In a way it already is legal. They have leveled the playing field with the biopassport, so that the allowable limit is quite low-microdosing. This is much safer and more fair for the athletes than what some have done in the past, raising red blood cells to over 50%, for example.

False. There is no rule to restrict doping to adults. So, kids like Rupp are/were being doped.

The WADA rules permit plenty of doping. There is no hope for a clean athlete on an elite international podium unless no dopers show up.

Also, again, the federations are not required to open a sanction on a positive.

If it wasn't for Seppelt's last report, we wouldn't know how much doping the IAAF permits. (Lots it seems)

There is no such thing as "breaking" news involving Victor Conte or anything he says. The man is completely irrelevant, has actually less than average knowledge and no special insight, and is an attention-seeking tumor in the sport. I feel sorry for anyone who takes him seriously.

Guhgyutiu wrote:

There is no such thing as "breaking" news involving Victor Conte or anything he says. The man is completely irrelevant, has actually less than average knowledge and no special insight, and is an attention-seeking tumor in the sport. I feel sorry for anyone who takes him seriously.

Similar things have been said about Landis.

Guhgyutiu wrote:

There is no such thing as "breaking" news involving Victor Conte or anything he says. The man is completely irrelevant, has actually less than average knowledge and no special insight, and is an attention-seeking tumor in the sport. I feel sorry for anyone who takes him seriously.

While anything Conte (or pretty much anyone else) says cannot be accepted as unerringly true, the man has had much experience in the business of drugging and avoiding detection.

Plenty of people want him to shut up or be ignored because what he says is damaging to their game/image/reputation.

I think he speaks more honestly than many of the officials who are taken as the pillars of the community.

Against Letsrun wrote:

Nice try, Rojo.

Your previous "NOP BREAKING NEWS" thing went nowhere, so now you are leaning on that paragon of virtue, Mr Conte.

Pathetic.

[quote]rojo wrote:

Wow. Big bombshell about Salazar/Rupp/Farah and the Jamaicans.

I didn't say it was true. I said it was newsworthy that Conte, one of the greatest doping masterminds in history, mentioned some of the biggest names in American distance running and world sprinting when asked who he thought should be tested. I've already written articles stating how I think Bolt could be clean.

If you don't think this is newsworthy, I guess you don't understand what is news.

News?

People creating their own news cycles; symmonds, fleshman, goucher family singers, lolo jones , ronda rousey, conte, brojos, in one big circle.

Duck Duck Goose was fun in elementary school, not so much after that .

Wasn't expecting this, lol. Looks like the 80-20 moment, we might see momentum and a flood of news coming out now, the door is open and the horse has bolted.

THE JAPANESE BOMBED PEARL HARBOR!!

Rike Mossi wrote:

Guhgyutiu wrote:

There is no such thing as "breaking" news involving Victor Conte or anything he says. The man is completely irrelevant, has actually less than average knowledge and no special insight, and is an attention-seeking tumor in the sport. I feel sorry for anyone who takes him seriously.

Similar things have been said about Landis.

x 1000 great comeback

rojo wrote:

Against Letsrun wrote:

Nice try, Rojo.

Your previous "NOP BREAKING NEWS" thing went nowhere, so now you are leaning on that paragon of virtue, Mr Conte.

Pathetic.

[quote]rojo wrote:

Wow. Big bombshell about Salazar/Rupp/Farah and the Jamaicans.

I didn't say it was true. I said it was newsworthy that Conte, one of the greatest doping masterminds in history, mentioned some of the biggest names in American distance running and world sprinting when asked who he thought should be tested. I've already written articles stating how I think Bolt could be clean.

If you don't think this is newsworthy, I guess you don't understand what is news.

So you should contact Dick Pound and get his comment. That's the sort of thing that journalists do.

wr potential wrote:

Wasn\'t expecting this, lol. Looks like the 80-20 moment, we might see momentum and a flood of news coming out now, the door is open and the horse has bolted.

The horse was doped.

Conte's probably right even though he may not have any information to specific cases.

The position on this board, in general, which seems to be awaiting a gotcha moment on nearly every elite athlete is mindnumbingly stupid.

The turds on this board and the edumacated pinheads that run it really believe that a multiple Olympic/World champion such as Usain Bolt being outed as a PED user is a good thing for the sport?

There would be little sport to follow.

The point is... wrote:

Whether you feel he is credible is not the issue.

The point is, everything he is saying is feasible and possible.

Give me a break wrote:

Exactly what makes anyone believe Victor Conte is credible?

I think his credibility is extremely important. I agree with you that what he says is plausible. I want to know whether it is true.