Total nonsense wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:No one outside the NOP
No one would period. I have nothing to do with NOP.
You would have DQ'd, which proves my point.
Either you can't read, or you think I'm in the NOP.
Total nonsense wrote:
Bad Wigins wrote:No one outside the NOP
No one would period. I have nothing to do with NOP.
You would have DQ'd, which proves my point.
Either you can't read, or you think I'm in the NOP.
Bad Wigins wrote:
Total nonsense wrote:No one would period. I have nothing to do with NOP.
You would have DQ'd, which proves my point.
Either you can't read, or you think I'm in the NOP.
You would have DQ'd, because you are no one.
Who's the one who can't read?
"or does not gain material advantage" Coburn didn't gain a material advantage by nearly tripping over the inside rail, so no dq.
pre841 wrote:
I'm curious if her spike plate caused the slip. She seems to have run in Nike Matumbos in the prelim as she was still in her Nike MSU gear. In the final, she was in an adidas top. Did she switch spikes for the final?
Adidas Avanti is the best steeple shoe on the market.
She was still wearing her Nike spikes with the swoosh covered.
Cavorty wrote:
"or does not gain material advantage" Coburn didn't gain a material advantage by nearly tripping over the inside rail, so no dq.
The rule is very badly written, so it's not easy to parse. But if you read it carefully, you'll see that's not what the rule says. It says that anyone who runs outside the boundary of the track shall be disqualified, unless the runner fits into one of three exceptions: .
a) the runner was forced to step out by another runner;
b) steps out on the straightaway;
c) or steps out on the outside edge of the track.
The phrase you quoted says these exceptions do not apply if the runner got a material advantage by stepping out.
None of these exceptions fit Coburn. She wasn't a) forced out, b) on the straightaway; or, c) on the outside lane. So it is irrelevant that stepping out didn't give her a material advantage.
In other words, under the rules, she was supposed to be DQ'ed.
The only loophole here is if the umpire did not see that she stepped out, or saw it and did not report it.
Here's the relevant portion of the rules:
Unless a material advantage has been gained or the athlete is in violation of Rule 163.4, a competitor shall not be disqualified if he or she:
(a) Is pushed or forced by another competitor to step out of the lane, or
(b) Steps out of the lane on the straightaway, or
(c) Steps or runs outside of the outer lane line on the curve, or on any straight part of the diversion from the track for the steeplechase water jump.
Excluding the above exceptions, the Referee shall disqualify a competitor if an Umpire reports that the competitor has stepped out of the lane
Pics?
We took the statemetn that she said God damnit out of the article beccause we got a text saying she didn't say it.
What do you think she says at the 13:44 mark?
http://www.usatf.tv/gprofile.php?mgroup_id=45365&do=videos&video_id=150405
You misread the rule wrote:
Here's the relevant portion of the rules:
Unless a material advantage has been gained or the athlete is in violation of Rule 163.4, a competitor shall not be disqualified if he or she:
(a) Is pushed or forced by another competitor to step out of the lane, or
(b) Steps out of the lane on the straightaway, or
(c) Steps or runs outside of the outer lane line on the curve, or on any straight part of the diversion from the track for the steeplechase water jump.
Excluding the above exceptions, the Referee shall disqualify a competitor if an Umpire reports that the competitor has stepped out of the lane
Ryun's 3:59.0 should not count.
Cavorty wrote:
"or does not gain material advantage" Coburn didn't gain a material advantage by nearly tripping over the inside rail, so no dq.
We did this when Fisher took five steps inside the track and a bunch of people tried to use the "material advantage" crap to say his race was still legal.
I thought runners were generally a smart group of people, but anyone who thinks cutting inside the track on turns without being pushed is legal, is dumb as a box of rocks. (I never use insults in political debates, but on running issues, yes).
Let's do this again for those who don't understand the iron clad logic that the rules can not possibly allow someone to cut the race short by running inside the rail on the turns.
USATF Rules 2015 Page 63 Rule 163 Section 5
Each competitor must keep in the lanes outside the line or curb marking the inside of the track, including the curved part of the diversion from the track for the steeplechase water jump. In races run entirely in lanes, each competitor must keep in the allotted lane from start to finish. In races run partially in lanes, each competitor must keep in the allotted lane from the start to the marked cut-in points. Unless a material advantage has been gained or the athlete is in violation of Rule 163.4, a competitor shall not be disqualified if he or she:
(a) Is pushed or forced by another competitor to step out of the lane, or
(b) Steps out of the lane on the straightaway, or
(c) Steps or runs outside of the outer lane line on the curve, or on any straight part of the diversion from the track for the steeplechase water jump
.
Excluding the above exceptions, the Referee shall disqualify a competitor if an Umpire reports that the competitor has stepped out of the lane.
NOTE: Material advantage includes improving position by any means, including exiting from a 'boxed' position in the race by having stepped or run inside the inside edge of the track.
The only parts of this rule that apply to this situation are in bold. She stepped inside the inner rail on a turn, and if a referee would have have reported it, she should have been disqualified.
The "material advantage" clause only applies to cases (a) (b) and (c) where being pushed, running inside on a straight, or running outside the outside bound don't grant a runner material advantage, then the runner might not get disqualified.
Colburn should have been DQ'd. That's what both the rule book and common sense says should have happened.
She clearly did not curse.
rojo wrote:
We took the statemetn that she said God damnit out of the article beccause we got a text saying she didn't say it.
What do you think she says at the 13:44 mark?
http://www.usatf.tv/gprofile.php?mgroup_id=45365&do=videos&video_id=150405
" Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain, "Exodus 20:7.
Another reason for a DQ. Clean up your act O'Connor.
Brutal, just brutal. She put the gas pedal down too early,
Seriously, what is it about the steeple that has given us a babe trifecta like this? Unprecedented.
DiscoGary wrote:
Let's do this again for those who don't understand the iron clad logic that the rules can not possibly allow someone to cut the race short by running inside the rail on the turns.
Excluding the above exceptions, the Referee shall disqualify a competitor if an Umpire reports that the competitor has stepped out of the lane.
Colburn should have been DQ'd. That's what both the rule book and common sense says should have happened.
Here is what happened.
1) Coburn didn't cut the race short;
2) Coburn did NOT "run" inside of the rail;
3) An umpire did NOT make any report of the incident;
4) Coburn was rightfully NOT disqualified;
5) You're still going to cry about it, because you're a crybaby.
rojo wrote:
What do you think she says at the 13:44 mark?
http://www.usatf.tv/gprofile.php?mgroup_id=45365&do=videos&video_id=150405
"Can't dance it"
El Wrong'o wrote:
2) Coburn did NOT "run" inside of the rail
I must be missing something. I always thought the rail was out of bounds, so that running on it was grounds for a DQ.
Here's the relevant rule, 163.5:
Each competitor must keep in the lanes outside the line or curb marking the inside of the track...
If the lanes are "outside the...curb marking the inside of the track" it would seem the curb is not in a lane.
What am I missing? Is there some other rule I should be looking at? Or precedent interpreting the rules?
She was still wearing Nike spikes. She only signed w/ Adidas 2 days prior to the race so she probably went w/ the shoes she felt comfortable with. I think she landed on the outer midfoot plate of spike and her foot just slipped to the side.
W/ O'Connor 4th, the most "beautiful" 1 to 4 track finish!
I’m a D2 female runner. Our coach explicitly told us not to visit LetsRun forums.
Great interview with Steve Cram - says Jakob has no chance of WRs this year
Guys between age of 45 and 55 do you think about death or does it seem far away
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
RENATO can you talk about the preparation of Emile Cairess 2:06
adizero Road to Records with Yomif Kejelcha, Agnes Ngetich, Hobbs Kessler & many more is Saturday