I agree with the other criticisms of Rojo. Salazar's statement provides much more evidence and detail than the accusations, and to state that this doesn't change much is perplexing. He doesn't just state his side of the story in a he-said/he-said type of way without providing any evidence, but with the sabotage test, for example, he provides contemporaneous emails and details that do not appear to match up with a micro-doping effort.
Is there still room for him to by lying? Sure. But not much. To say the microdoping theory is still an open question, you have to come up with some plausible explanation for those emails from 2009, and you need some kind of explanation that the testing protocol used (and supported by evidence) is better explained by a micro-doping theory than a sabotage test.
Rojo, I know you aren't a lawyer, but contemporaneous documents like these provide much stronger evidence than what has been provided by the accusers so far.