Bad Wigins wrote:
Science is not your friend wrote:possibility of increasing energy production with reduced hydrocarbon use through wind or nuclear or solar.
pipe dream, never gonna happen, not better anyhow.
Turning fossil fuels into electricity to run cars will never be as efficient as simple running the cars on fossil fuels, no matter how high-tech your plants are. It will only end up increasing fossil fuel use.
There is only ONE solution to the world's energy problems, and that's to figure out how to stop using so much energy. Gluttonous consumption is the problem. Stop driving motorized vehicles at all. Never use air conditioning. This will probably not happen until the fossil fuel supply starts dwindling.
How can this not be more efficient in any way?
Are you qualified to make such predictions with any degree of confidence? I thought you were in the health care industry? Sports medicine if I'm correct?
If you were right, then why don't we all have our own generators? Why is there an electric grid? Why do the metro trains use common electric lines instead of individual motors?
Do you know anything about engine efficiency and their limitations?
The biggest barrier right now is battery capacity. It is still about 50% of where it needs to be but there are several advances which are passing through the R&D stages and will likely be scalable within a decade.
Honestly it sounds like you are just talking out of your ass. People who say xyz will NEVER work are often wrong. Making such bold predictions in engineering fields with a sports medicine background is... Well... Talking out of your ass.