Texan female animal vet shoots arrow through head of cat - posts smiling picture of self with cat

Here is her hunting ground:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/4740+Corkwood+Ln,+Beaumont,+TX+77706/@30.096343,-94.15377,664m/data=

!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x8639335500886bad:0xd75c9e5af226d720

You are stupid wrote:

The Overexplainer wrote:

What would a feral cat do in your neighborhood that is so terrible? Kill too many mice and bats? My cat runs around outside all the time and kills mice, bats, ... and that is about it.

Cats kill billions of other animals a year in the U.S. alone,

plus they spread diseases and make many humans sick from their filth.

Their filth runs down people's immune systems and is a factor in people getting aids.

Your cat is not your cat when it's running around wild. It's a wild feral cat that you feed, that stalks the neighborhood destroying other people's property and kills other animals.

"A factor in people getting AIDS"??

Between you and the anti-vaxxers, it's clear that our country's educational system is seriously deficient when it comes to teaching basic science.

bad pusy wrote:

... Better to have cats stalking the neighborhood than thugs and criminals.

But worse than apple pie a la mode. So what exactly is your point?

You are stupid wrote:

The Overexplainer wrote:

What would a feral cat do in your neighborhood that is so terrible? Kill too many mice and bats? My cat runs around outside all the time and kills mice, bats, ... and that is about it.

Cats kill billions of other animals a year in the U.S. alone,

plus they spread diseases and make many humans sick from their filth.

Their filth runs down people's immune systems and is a factor in people getting aids.

Your cat is not your cat when it's running around wild. It's a wild feral cat that you feed, that stalks the neighborhood destroying other people's property and kills other animals.

What kind of property does my cat destroy? All I ever see her do is lay in the driveway or in the weeds.

You are stupid wrote:

The Overexplainer wrote:

What would a feral cat do in your neighborhood that is so terrible? Kill too many mice and bats? My cat runs around outside all the time and kills mice, bats, ... and that is about it.

Cats kill billions of other animals a year in the U.S. alone,

plus they spread diseases and make many humans sick from their filth.

Their filth runs down people's immune systems and is a factor in people getting aids.

Your cat is not your cat when it's running around wild. It's a wild feral cat that you feed, that stalks the neighborhood destroying other people's property and kills other animals.

Just how much cat poop do you eat in an average week?

The point that many of you are predictably missing is that she was boasting of her kill. She spent energy on showing others what she'd done. She made it a point to pose with something she killed. Who does this?

You are stupid wrote:

Cats kill billions of other animals a year in the U.S. alone,

plus they spread diseases and make many humans sick from their filth.

Their filth runs down people's immune systems and is a factor in people getting aids.

Your cat is not your cat when it's running around wild. It's a wild feral cat that you feed, that stalks the neighborhood destroying other people's property and kills other animals.

With respect, I don't understand your rationale on this. I live in an MSA of 450,000 people. I live in a suburb, but it is next to a University of 45,000 people. I live about .5 miles away from a main entrance to the Univ. It is not a heavily urban place. We have possums, mice, raccoons, woodchucks, rabbits, foxes, skunks in our yards all the time.

I know because I have LIVE-trapped a woodchuck several times. When I did, I took it out to a NATURAL AREA with features that are highly prized by woodchucks (Woods, river and forest). When I LIVE-trapped the woodchuck about 9 out of 10 times I trapped a different animal (usually a raccoon, but all of those on the list) many times before LIVE-trapping the woodchuck.

Without exception, EVERY SINGLE TIME I let the non-woodchuck animal go. Sometimes they were very vicious, sometimes they were not. Possums get very scared and raccoons get really panicky and fight, and sometimes they just slink slowly away. I think they fear the sun more than anything.

Anyway, NEVER did I feel that I needed to shoot any of these animals in the head. They never created any problem or threatened me, in any way. I lived with the woodchucks for 10 years and they just started ruining the lawn with their tunneling. So they had to go to a new place.

All of these animals poop outside. So far I have been successful in avoiding eating ANY of their poop and I have lived here my whole life. I have never gotten sick from a wild animal or a cat, domestic or feral, because I don't lick them or eat their poop.

You should try this.

I don't think anyone should shoot an animal unless there is a safety problem with the animal. I have never felt threatened by possums, raccoons, woodchucks or little cats. They are usually very scared of me and they run and hide and want no part of interacting with you.

But that is me, and I am quite a man.

psychopath alert wrote:

The point that many of you are predictably missing is that she was boasting of her kill. She spent energy on showing others what she'd done. She made it a point to pose with something she killed. Who does this?

Have you ever met a hunter?

newname wrote:

psychopath alert wrote:

The point that many of you are predictably missing is that she was boasting of her kill. She spent energy on showing others what she'd done. She made it a point to pose with something she killed. Who does this?

Have you ever met a hunter?

Yeah. Especially a hunter of that fierce member of the Big Five - the domestic house cat!

This calls for a duel between the "vet" and Pirate Cat Gun Girl.

Smarter Than You Is Easy wrote:

bad pusy wrote:

... Better to have cats stalking the neighborhood than thugs and criminals.

But worse than apple pie a la mode. So what exactly is your point?

The one you didn't get.

Kevin52 wrote:

This calls for a duel between the "vet" and Pirate Cat Gun Girl.

well done.

Exactly. This girl couldn't wait for this opportunity to come, and when it did she wasted no time in gushing to the whole world what a sad cow she is. Shooting a cat in the head with an arrow fur (pun time baby) her own little thrills. This ties in with gun culture and the "I can own a weapon and have the right to use it" mindset. Sooooooo childish.C'mon guys, leave the wild west where it belongs, in history.

psychopath alert wrote:

The point that many of you are predictably missing is that she was boasting of her kill. She spent energy on showing others what she'd done. She made it a point to pose with something she killed. Who does this?

Meanwhile muslims are running around all over the world carving peoples' heads off with old steak knives (and no anesthesia) and everyone's freaking out about this.

Hunters R Us wrote:

newname wrote:

Have you ever met a hunter?

Yeah. Especially a hunter of that fierce member of the Big Five - the domestic house cat!

To me, this story is stunning for its sheer shameless stupidity. Personally, I don't feel much sympathy for the cat's owners. Anyone who lets their cats wander around outdoors knows they are taking a risk. They acknowledge they have a disposable pet, kind of like folks who drive around with their unchained/unleashed dog in their pickup bed.

But what do we expect from a vet when we bring her our pet if not some combination of professionalism and compassion? Professionalism here meaning a capacity for good judgment and reasoned behavior -- but in this case we have someone who hunts cats, discharging a deadly weapon in a suburban neighborhood -- posts her kill on social media as a bonafide trophy -- and then is so cluelessly self absorbed that she can't comprehend how the very people who bring their precious pets to her for shots might take offense that she takes pleasure in killing that same animal.

Nuts.

Well, it seems like from this story there's at least ONE woman out there who might very well be attracted to that kind of sociopathy.

has to be said wrote:

This is why y'all can't get laid. Women can sense your sociopathy 1,609 meters away.

Good shot! wrote:

One less dumb stinky cat.

http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5541066.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/Kristen-Lindsey.jpg

newname wrote:

Have you ever met a hunter?

And hunters who pose with their "trophies" are just as pathetic as this chick.

You work in a vet's office. Your job is to patch up Bowser and Trixie (doggie and puddycat).

You post a picture of yourself on FB holding up a dead cat with an arrow buried in its skull? And you expect John and Jane Doe, not to mention your boss, to take your word that it's a BAD puddycat?

That is idiotic.

It may be the most idiotic thing I've ever heard.

It's the right thing to do if your dream job is big-game hunter. It's the wrong thing to do if you're hoping to solidify your brand as a puddycat-healer.

KudzuRunner wrote:

It's the right thing to do if your dream job is big-game hunter. It's the wrong thing to do if you're hoping to solidify your brand as a puddycat-healer.

Said the person who has never worked in a Vet clinic.

Get back to us when you've spent a few months at it.

I'm fascinated by the story though.

-What if it was a man instead of a woman?

-What if it was a woman that wasn't as attractive in some ways?

-What if the vet was gay?

There are a number of social factors at play to launch this nonsense into the stratosphere. All very interesting.