dial it up wrote:
Phallus enormicus wrote:That says a lot about the company you keep.
Those are the same women who prefer men to shave their genitals, armpits, chests and backs. In other words, people that have been brainwashed by what the media throws at them.
Attractive women? Yep, it does say a lot. Don't be upset that normal, attractive women don't want anything to do with your little stink wrap.
They might be attractive, but they're not normal. And they're probably not attractive, either.
Average phallus wrote:
dial it up wrote:Attractive women? Yep, it does say a lot. Don't be upset that normal, attractive women don't want anything to do with your little stink wrap.
They might be attractive, but they're not normal. And they're probably not attractive, either.
71-83% prefer circumcised. I'd say that's pretty normal.
http://www.circumstitions.com/Iowa.htmlHere is a survey that showed 54% prefer circumcised, while only 3% preferred uncircumcised.
http://www.circumstitions.com/Iowa.htmlWe can debate whether they're attractive all day but they are normal in their beliefs on this issue.
I was circumcised at age 29, so I can provide first hand experience from one person's perspective on both before and after.
After the circumcision, there was less smell. It's gross, but I could shower in the morning and by the evening there would be this smell. This smelly, gross looking stuff like toe jam would build up underneath the foreskin. I'd have to shower twice a day in summer to get rid of it.
After the circ, I could last longer... a lot longer. My wife and I both noticed the difference. That was a big plus.
After a few weeks, the head grew noticeably bigger than it was before. Again, that's another plus.
The surgery itself left me with stitches in the foreskin for the first couple of weeks. Nighttime erections would have me waking up in agony. Even after the stitches were out, I had to wait another couple of weeks to have sex again. That's a big negative on waiting until you're an adult to make this decision.
Men who wish that they had their foreskin back have never experienced what it's like to actually have a foreskin. I have. I would never, ever want it back.
0/10
If there was a smell or smegma, it was because you have poor personal hygiene.
The head grew bigger? Physiologically impossible.
Pleasure 

There’s no clear-cut answer how circumcision affects female pleasure. One recent study from Denmark found that women with circumcised spouses were twice as likely to report dissatisfaction in the sack than those with uncircumcised hubbies. (But other studies have shown the opposite.) One way his foreskin can be a tool for your pleasure: When an uncircumcised guy’s foreskin retracts, it may bunch up around the base of his penis, providing a little extra friction against your clitoris, says Paduch. “This is going to play a role [in pleasure] for women who have the clitoral pattern of arousal,†he says.
Pain
Women with circumcised partners are three times more likely to experience sexual pain than ladies with uncircumcised spouses, the study from Denmark found. “The uncircumcised penis is much glossier, a more velvety feel,†says Paduch. “So for women who aren’t lubricating well, they mave much less discomfort having sex with a guy who is uncircumcised.†He adds that guys who have their foreskin intact require lubricant far less frequently during sex and masturbation, since the skin of their penis in naturally slicker.
done at 29 wrote:
I was circumcised at age 29, so I can provide first hand experience from one person's perspective on both before and after.
After the circumcision, there was less smell. It's gross, but I could shower in the morning and by the evening there would be this smell. This smelly, gross looking stuff like toe jam would build up underneath the foreskin. I'd have to shower twice a day in summer to get rid of it.
After the circ, I could last longer... a lot longer. My wife and I both noticed the difference. That was a big plus.
After a few weeks, the head grew noticeably bigger than it was before. Again, that's another plus.
The surgery itself left me with stitches in the foreskin for the first couple of weeks. Nighttime erections would have me waking up in agony. Even after the stitches were out, I had to wait another couple of weeks to have sex again. That's a big negative on waiting until you're an adult to make this decision.
Men who wish that they had their foreskin back have never experienced what it's like to actually have a foreskin. I have. I would never, ever want it back.
This is ludicrous.
(a.) Normal hygiene is all that is required to prevent smegma or any smell. The fact that you had poor hygiene is not other men's problem.
(b.) The fact that you suffered from premature ejaculation prior to your circumcision does not mean that other men ought to get circumcised, thereby reducing their sensitivity.
Circumcision was a (rather extreme) cure for two problems you suffered from. Congratulations! However, your experience has no teaching value whatsoever.
Same experience. I was 14, kept getting made fun of for my odd penis with the nipple on the end. Also, was getting mucosal tearing beneath the foreskin (wasn't yet pummeling my meat on a regular basis, so wasn't that). Washed like crazy, 2-4 times a day and still would be funky. Also, the mucosa underneath was so sensitive it was almost painful to touch - kind of like touching your eyeball.
Recovery from surgery was rough. Same as done at 29. Took about a month to be fully recovered. Having had a foreskin, and then not, I can honestly say I'm very glad to not have one.
Also, I'm a physician. Not a urologist, so not an expert, but I do believe the health benefits are a bit oversold. Penile cancer does happen but is incredibly uncommon. Mainly issues with infections and STD transmission.
As a sidenote, in medical school, it was funny when I worked on the OB ward. One of the responsibilities was talking to the new mothers about circumcising their babies. There was a large Hispanic population, and when we would offer circumcision through a translator, they would look shocked. Pretty sure they thought we were offering to cut off their son's penis. It just didn't translate culturally.
That's Great! Thanks for posting and keep us updated!
done at 14 wrote:
As a sidenote, in medical school, it was funny when I worked on the OB ward. One of the responsibilities was talking to the new mothers about circumcising their babies. There was a large Hispanic population, and when we would offer circumcision through a translator, they would look shocked. Pretty sure they thought we were offering to cut off their son's penis. It just didn't translate culturally.
You *were* offering to cut off part of their son's penis and shock was, therefore, the appropriate reaction. The very notion of such a procedure is barbaric and an affront to basic human decency -- nothing cultural about it. There is, however, a cultural brainwashing that has managed to convince some populations that such a twisted, cruel procedure is healthy.
Dial it up wrote:
71-83% prefer circumcised. I'd say that's pretty normal.
http://www.circumstitions.com/Iowa.htmlHere is a survey that showed 54% prefer circumcised, while only 3% preferred uncircumcised.
http://www.circumstitions.com/Iowa.htmlWe can debate whether they're attractive all day but they are normal in their beliefs on this issue.
I guess you missed this part from your link...
[This paper is a fairly typical example of pro-circumcision bias in a supposedly scientific paper.]
Phallus enormicus wrote:
Dial it up wrote:I happen to be at a bar with a work group. I posed this question to six relatively successful females, 4/6 are attractive. All 6 said they are grossed out by an uncut hog. Take it for what it's worth
That says a lot about the company you keep.
Those are the same women who prefer men to shave their genitals, armpits, chests and backs. In other words, people that have been brainwashed by what the media throws at them.
These same women likely sport a ham wallet with a can of sardines in it.
Beef curtain wrote:
Phallus enormicus wrote:That says a lot about the company you keep.
Those are the same women who prefer men to shave their genitals, armpits, chests and backs. In other words, people that have been brainwashed by what the media throws at them.
These same women likely sport a ham wallet with a can of sardines in it.
Unfortunately you and your disgusting little stinky pink in a blanket will never be able to find out.
Hey, numbnuts wrote:
Dial it up wrote:71-83% prefer circumcised. I'd say that's pretty normal.
http://www.circumstitions.com/Iowa.htmlHere is a survey that showed 54% prefer circumcised, while only 3% preferred uncircumcised.
http://www.circumstitions.com/Iowa.htmlWe can debate whether they're attractive all day but they are normal in their beliefs on this issue.
I guess you missed this part from your link...
[This paper is a fairly typical example of pro-circumcision bias in a supposedly scientific paper.]
You're right, 54% vs 3% is all due to bias. Your handle suits you well
Hi K5 wrote:
The Brotherhood... wrote:Jews shoulder a lot of the blame here, they introduced the perverse practice.
Hey K5. How goes?
Apparently anyone who disagrees with israeli barbarism is K5.
Dial it up wrote:
I happen to be at a bar with a work group. I posed this question to six relatively successful females, 4/6 are attractive. All 6 said they are grossed out by an uncut hog. Take it for what it's worth
Don't hang out with ho's in bars.
Dial it up wrote:
Hey, numbnuts wrote:I guess you missed this part from your link...
[This paper is a fairly typical example of pro-circumcision bias in a supposedly scientific paper.]
You're right, 54% vs 3% is all due to bias. Your handle suits you well
So you admit to knowing the link you posted was debunking that pro-circumcision "study"? And you thought it was so important that you posted the same link to support both of your sets of statistics? Wow....just wow.
The only thing debunked is that at least 54% of women, maybe closer to 80%, don't want to be near the stinky little pig in a blanket you call your dick
No cut for me, every woman I've had not only hasn't been bothered by it, they've preferred it. And my nerve cluster is intact and, quite frankly, heaven on Earth to have. Hygiene has never been an issue.
dial it up wrote:
The only thing debunked is that at least 54% of women, maybe closer to 80%, don't want to be near the stinky little pig in a blanket you call your dick
Woohoo!
dial it up wrote:
The only thing debunked is that at least 54% of women, maybe closer to 80%, don't want to be near the stinky little pig in a blanket you call your dick
Thank you for admitting that (though something tells me you don't realize what you wrote).