Bruce Jenner kills a woman

described what happened based on a preliminary investigation:

"Jenner was driving an SUV carrying a dune buggy on the northbound side of PCH that rear-ended a Lexus sedan, Brooks said, noting that traffic was not moving very quickly. One of the drivers may have stopped short.

"It appears one vehicle stopped in traffic— we're not sure why. The second vehicle, a Lexus, hit that car, and a third vehicle carrying a trailer. Mr. Jenner, struck the Lexus after the collision," Brooks said.

The Lexus was sandwiched between Jenner's SUV and a Toyota Prius, Brooks said.

The Lexus then spun or veered into the quickly moving southbound lane of PCH, where it was hit head-on by a Hummer, he said. The driver of the Lexus, a woman, died."

According to this report, Jenner was not at fault.

So, in your version of the world, Jenner smashed into the white car without ever breaking. He was fully aware that was was going to hit the care while driving some 40, or more, mph.

BTW, people regularly drive 45-50 on that stretch of highway.

If he was texting and driving, he deserves to pay the ultimate penalties in all categories...for texting and driving, reckless driving, and vehicular manslaughter etc.

I've been hoping for some way to get this attention seeking twit out of "our" headlines. (I'm pretty much anti "reality" show attention seekers across the board, and he and the Kardashians are just trash.)

I hope this avoidable tragedy puts him behind bars and out of the news.

This avoidable manslaughter is the perfect case maker for why not to text and drive and why celebridiots such as himself should have a driver.

I guess it was only a matter of time before a "celebrity" (there is nothing to celebrate about this guy) would be a part / a cause of one of these vehicular manslaughter cases due to texting and driving.

What is it about human beings that when the law makes it illegal to text and drive...a certain percentage think they get to skip that law cos they are excited to text someone in the moment???

If he had pulled over to text, that woman would be alive and her family and friends not grieving her forever...

ekw wrote:

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/PCH-Closed-in-Malibu-After-Fatal-Crash-291158071.html

described what happened based on a preliminary investigation:

"Jenner was driving an SUV carrying a dune buggy on the northbound side of PCH that rear-ended a Lexus sedan, Brooks said, noting that traffic was not moving very quickly. One of the drivers may have stopped short.

"It appears one vehicle stopped in traffic— we're not sure why. The second vehicle, a Lexus, hit that car, and a third vehicle carrying a trailer. Mr. Jenner, struck the Lexus after the collision," Brooks said.

The Lexus was sandwiched between Jenner's SUV and a Toyota Prius, Brooks said.

The Lexus then spun or veered into the quickly moving southbound lane of PCH, where it was hit head-on by a Hummer, he said. The driver of the Lexus, a woman, died."

According to this report, Jenner was not at fault.

Okay, that sounds possible and would explain the pictures of him texting...perhaps.

None the less, he's still at fault for rear-ending a car. The PCH is notorious for sudden stop and go conditions and speeding...

Still, I won't be surprised if he rear-ended that car because he was texting...

Jenner could have avoid escalating the accident if he was paying attention while driving.

"Okay, that sounds possible and would explain the pictures of him texting...perhaps."

No, Jenner looking at the phone caused a non-deadly accident to become a deadly accident. Jenner hit the white car had enough to force it into oncoming traffic. That he hit the car while on the left-rear end is what pushed the white car out the lane it was in.

With that most recent report, I still don't see how you guys think Jenner could be at fault if he was the THIRD vehicle involved!

-"Car A" stopped in traffic.

-"Car B" hit "Car A" in traffic.

-"Jenner" hit "Car B" which moved it into the way of "Hummer".

The way I hear it, Jenner was just an innocent driver who was involved because he was right behind an accident caused by an unexpected "Car "B hitting "Car A" who stopped in traffic for an unknown reason.

You guys hate Jenner so much that you HOPE he is at fault even though all new information coming out of the investigation is saying otherwise!

wke wrote:

"Okay, that sounds possible and would explain the pictures of him texting...perhaps."

No, Jenner looking at the phone caused a non-deadly accident to become a deadly accident. Jenner hit the white car had enough to force it into oncoming traffic. That he hit the car while on the left-rear end is what pushed the white car out the lane it was in.

WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THE INFORMATION THAT HE WAS ON HIS PHONE?!?!? I Just don't understand this reasoning was ZERO evidence that he was on his phone. You CANNOT see his hands in the photos! You can barely make out his arm stretched out to what appears to be about 10pm level on his steering wheel. Can somebody PLEASE show me a photo of Jenner on his phone at the time of the accident?!?!

@ I still don't see how you guys think Jenner could be at fault if he was the THIRD vehicle involved!

Because there was no reason for a THIRD vehicle to be involved. If Jenner looking straight ahead--it appears he was not from the photos--then he does not become involved, and no one gets killed.

Cali has a driving while texting law. It will be interesting to see how it gets used in Jenner's accident.

ekw wrote:

Can somebody PLEASE show me a photo of Jenner on his phone at the time of the accident?!?!

A link to photos was provided by the OP.

Not paying attention wrote:

ekw wrote:

Can somebody PLEASE show me a photo of Jenner on his phone at the time of the accident?!?!

A link to photos was provided by the OP.

Yes, I'm aware of those photos... Those photos do not show ANY detail of Jenner other than he is wearing a blue shirt and his arm is stretched out above the height of his side window. I see no phone. I see a face that appears to be facing forward out his front windshield. I just DON'T see any texting evidence.

Not paying attention wrote:there was no reason for a THIRD vehicle to be involved. If Jenner looking straight ahead--it appears he was not from the photos--then he does not become involved, and no one gets killed.

What a complete leap from the minimal evidence currently made public (3 very small blurry images).

Jenner is in police custody. Why is that?

Texting while driving is just as bad as Driving While Pre.

Not paying attention wrote:

Jenner is in police custody. Why is that?

Link?

Pics?

Evidence he is in custody?

My goodness...is this the way people are now? Not one of you nitwits has any idea of what hapoened; yet you've got him texting and killing someone. Unbelievable. Total tools here.

Oh dear. I thought it said "Bruce Jenner Kills AS a Woman." Seemed unlikely but medical technology is amazing. This however, is much worse news.

Not paying attention wrote:

Jenner is in police custody. Why is that?

Everyone can ignore that post. It's completely made up. As are the texting and driving accusations.

ekw wrote:

Not paying attention wrote:

A link to photos was provided by the OP.

Yes, I'm aware of those photos... Those photos do not show ANY detail of Jenner other than he is wearing a blue shirt and his arm is stretched out above the height of his side window. I see no phone. I see a face that appears to be facing forward out his front windshield. I just DON'T see any texting evidence.

Bruce was texting me at the time. I can fix your eyes too.