I honestly have no idea what question you seem to think I'm dodging.
And you bringing up quotes doesn't change what I said. Did you honestly ask for 10k lines of code? I know you didn't. You wouldn't know what you were looking at anyways. You wanted to know what goes into QBR, I've provided that for you. You're welcome.
By the way, how long has this discussion been going on? Weeks? You reposting that original exchange reminds me how irrelevant the qbr formula is to the discussion. As if you don't trust ESPN of all places to provide you statistical analysis. It also doesn't change the fact that QUARTERBACK rating is a better judge of a quarterback play than team super bowl wins.
Russell MF Wilson
Pro News/Info/Results
Distance
Report Thread
You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.
-
-
You obviously do not understand QBR. It is weighted to reflect what the QB does to help his team WIN. By definition, SB wins correlate very highly with QBR.
-
ESPN staffer wrote:
You obviously do not understand QBR. It is weighted to reflect what the QB does to help his team WIN. By definition, SB wins correlate very highly with QBR.
No they don't. Tony Romo has 0 super bowl wins, he has the highest qbr for 2014. The top 3 in qbr have a CAREER TOTAL of 2 Super Bowls.
Btw ESPN even points out the various things that go into it on the page containing the rankings. "Super Bowls" play no part in it. Especially since these are regular season rankings numb nuts.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/qbr -
Dial it up wrote:
I honestly have no idea what question you seem to think I'm dodging.
That's odd, since you answered it in your next post. And thank you for that. I was wrong about that and you were right.
Dial it up wrote:
And you bringing up quotes doesn't change what I said. Did you honestly ask for 10k lines of code? I know you didn't. You wouldn't know what you were looking at anyways. You wanted to know what goes into QBR, I've provided that for you. You're welcome.
Of course bringing up quotes doesn't change what you said. It illustrates exactly what you said. In this case, it proves you claimed you had the formula; not what goes into it, but the actual formula. That is what I asked for. knowing the ingredients without the recipe is worthless to me. I had already read the wiki page before ever posting.
Dial it up wrote:
By the way, how long has this discussion been going on? Weeks? You reposting that original exchange reminds me how irrelevant the qbr formula is to the discussion. As if you don't trust ESPN of all places to provide you statistical analysis. It also doesn't change the fact that QUARTERBACK rating is a better judge of a quarterback play than team super bowl wins.
Now you're clearly exaggerating. It's been 10 days since I first posted. Since you ignored my initial question, I bumped it a day later.
By the way, I never argued that QB rating was a better judge than anything. I simply asked about the formula since you claimed to know so much about it. I'm still waiting. -
Your use of insults reveals the weakness of your position.
Do you really not know that QBR is applied to the postseason? -
ESPN staffer wrote:
Your use of insults reveals the weakness of your position.
Do you really not know that QBR is applied to the postseason?
They have regular season qbr and post season qbr right? Yes. So the fact that they have regular season qbr means Super Bowls have no bearing -
Who said Super Bowls affect regular season QBR?
-
ESPN staffer wrote:
You obviously do not understand QBR. It is weighted to reflect what the QB does to help his team WIN. By definition, SB wins correlate very highly with QBR.
This idiot said they correlate which they obviously don't -
Winning is related to QBR. Winning in the regular season has an affect on regular season QBR. Winning in the postseason has an affect on postseason QBR.
-
[quote]HawkEye wrote:
he was clutch when he needed to be./quote]
How about that clutch job Russell MF Wilson.
Choke job! -
1-2 wrote:
[quote]HawkEye wrote:
he was clutch when he needed to be./quote]
How about that clutch job Russell MF Wilson.
Choke job!
Don't expect anything but silence. Same as the other thread. It's not cool to act like you know football after you are proven wrong by 4 INT's in the NFC title and the game clinching pick in the super bowl -
That as a bad call, period. Wilson outplayed the overrated Brady, who threw two picks by the way, that as the choke job, until Pete Carroll trumped all chokes with that call.
-
Reality check. wrote:
That as a bad call, period. Wilson outplayed the overrated Brady, who threw two picks by the way, that as the choke job, until Pete Carroll trumped all chokes with that call.
HAHAHA.
Over 320 yards, 4 TD's vs
240 yards, and 2TD's
When the game was on the line:
One QB led TWO 4th qtr TD drives for the WIN
and the other got one of the luckiest catches in football history and then threw his 5th pick in two games to lose it. -
Reality check. wrote:
That as a bad call, period. Wilson outplayed the overrated Brady, who threw two picks by the way, that as the choke job, until Pete Carroll trumped all chokes with that call.
It's cute watching Wilson try to drop back & throw a normal pass instead of running around like a scared child until someone gets open enough for him.
Interception & an epic choke job on the biggest stage when it mattered most.
Tom Brady you mentioned? 328 yards & 4 TDs against the mighty Legion of Boom. Also another Super Bowl MVP for him. His 3rd one. Wilson can keep trying though. He might get one someday. I forgot. Another super bowl record passing record for Mr Brady as well. -
Brady threw 50 passes, averaged 6 yds a pass. He also threw two picks. Sorry, he didn't win Carroll lost the game. Montana never threw a pick in a Super Bowl, Brady throws two and is MVP, what a joke.
Don't forget, Seattle lost a top defender on Brady's first pick, and three starters wee playing banged up. Not impressed. Just disappointed in the call, Seattle should have won. -
Reality checker... wrote:
Brady threw 50 passes, averaged 6 yds a pass. He also threw two picks. Sorry, he didn't win Carroll lost the game. Montana never threw a pick in a Super Bowl, Brady throws two and is MVP, what a joke.
Don't forget, Seattle lost a top defender on Brady's first pick, and three starters wee playing banged up. Not impressed. Just disappointed in the call, Seattle should have won.
Wahhh wahhhh wahhh.
Hop in the long line of those making excuses and crying after losing to Brady and Belichick -
Reality checker... wrote:
Sorry, he didn't win Carroll lost the game.
Oh, bull$hit. I bet you were one of the posters 2 weeks ago after the win over the Packers saying Wilson is the greatest ever, & it wasn't the Packers who lost the game, but Wilson who is always so clutch, who won it. -
It's comical that Wilson isn't getting any blame for the interception at the end of the game.
Imagine if Brett Favre or Tony Romo threw that pick. You'd never hear the end of it, but Wilson throws it & everybody blames the coach. -
I can't believe the idiots on here are actually trying to argue that Wilson played badly, let alone choked. He outplayed Brady for chrissakes.
