First of all, coming from a fatherless home doesn't mean born out of wedlock. It often means she divorced the father and took his kids.
Next you throw all these big numbers around while ignoring the relatively small numbers of Americans that are rapists, adolescent murderers or long term prison inmates. Without checking statistics I am sure the number of fatherless children far outstrips the few criminals you list.
In other words, you're using misleading language to falsely associate fatherless children with a tiny minority who turn to these crimes. You should be ashamed of yourself. No wonder single-parent children are more likely to have emotional issues, what with self-righteous jerks like you calling them rapists, doubtless in the pursuit of some religio-moral crusade.
Wise people have understood since the days of the caveman that marriage is not a matter of religion or morality, but of territory and wealth. For the man, it establishes that the woman's uterus is off limits to other men, so he can be sure her offspring are his. For the woman, it establishes that material wealth will be available to ensure the survival of her offspring. In modern industrial society these purposes are compromised - men have paternity testing to avoid being cuckolded, and women have laws allowing them to take the father's money whether they're married or not. That is why marriage is less popular, and no amount of whining about traditions or insulting fatherless children will change that.
It is true that children do better raised by a mother and father, but few fail utterly as you suggest, so to imply that there's some kind of cycle of repetition is deceitful. If you value your cause, you should clean up your tactics.